>A small number of Nazis protest somewhere, usually under the guise of freely expressing their opinions, and the police protect them under a mandate of upholding the First Amendment. By bolstering the narrative that speech should be protected at all costs, the police help smuggle white supremacist thought, policy, and action into the mainstream. >What I’ve found through my research and reporting is that free speech has become a rhetorical tool to elide something much more sinister: the state’s support and protection of white supremacists, and this country’s unwillingness to grapple with its racism. >I’ve been disheartened to see not only conservatives and fascists but also liberals criticizing those who protest against the free speech rights of the most vile groups in America. >Their argument usually harks back to the oft-misattributed quote: “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” Their reasoning makes clear that most of the USA has a deep misunderstanding of what free speech means. >The billion-dollar investment in what is essentially right-wing propaganda has worked: We no longer think of free speech logically or accurately. Is a college protest over a conservative speaker really a violation of free speech? What about the college students’ right to protest—is that not as important a free speech issue? Colleges are already some of the most restrictive speech environments in the world, deciding who can enter the campus via an admissions process, what gets taught in every classroom, and who gets to teach it. >Is my rejection from UC Berkeley a free speech violation? I might disagree with their decision, but no, it’s not. I don’t expect to be invited to conservative Christian universities, and I don’t view that as a violation of my free speech either. Why should conservatives expect an open invitation wherever they please? thenation.com/article/archive/portland-speech-milo-antifa-koch/
Yes, i automatically agree because the author is jewish
Andrew Smith
fpbp
Gavin Gutierrez
One of the central faiths in progressivism is the belief that peoples’ freedom extends to the belief in that which enables freedom, which is the capacity of benevolence of mind which presumably resides in us all.
Racists are nakedly corrupt warriors. If we didn’t have them, launch loops could proliferate around the equator. If people are voluntarily promoting racism, they’re surrendering advancements in society and risking the destruction of our species.
Free speech was given to the right in trust that the common draw of a beautiful future could permit a harmony if society. Indeed, free speech was given to us all in this spirit.
Inevitably, then, it becomes defined by its most dubious uses, and it is up to us to decide if we wish by our activities to submit to the classification.
Xavier Bennett
>Since when did Free Speech became a "far right" concept Yas Forums? When the Left thought they could take control of the entire government apparatus.
Jordan Davis
An honest Jew? Now that's new
Lincoln Green
No.
Hudson Wright
I'm going to make some presumptions about the author.
Evan Lee
Don't you do it nazi, don't you fucking DARE
Justin Miller
When the left started to lose the arguments
Colton Jones
Free speech does not equal hate speech. Racists and the far-right hijacked it to spread some of the vilest shit, such as advocating genocide of a certain group of people and race. And now because of this we have a surge of right-wing terrorism in the West due to idiots being inspired by these fringe talking points. Of course there will be a backslash as what they are doing is spreading blatant racism and hate, and it's dangerous
Jacob Gomez
Here's a 'free speech' experiment. >if jews are white >white on white slurs can't be anti-semitic >we call jews honkies, cause they're (((white))) and their honkin noses >jews are now honkies HONK HONK
Word salad, bullshit. An attempt to hijack the truth to a political cause by suppressing opposite view points.
Kayden Davis
This. This kike is basically complaining that his antifa golems are not allowed to violently suppress dissident speech in addition to the harassment and intimidation they already do. He wouldn't complain about police presence being "wasted" on defending the Little Rock 9 from "free speech."
Incorrect. True freedom means having the freedom to express your hatred. I mean coloreds enjoy the right to spout anti-white hatred consequence free.
Grayson Parker
There may be a valid reason to kill group x. Isis comes to mind.
Nolan Long
>this is a Bong’s brain after viewing BBC
Elijah Butler
free speech is hate speech if its not used to tear down whites and males. the second amendment isnt valid today HOW DARE YOU IMPLY THE FREEDOM OF THE PRESS IS A PROBLEM!?!?!?! YOURE UNAMMERICAN YOU FUCKING COMMIE
Anthony Morris
why do you think reddit and twitter are mocking free speech by calling it "muh freeze peach"?
Ryan Campbell
article written by a jew
Tyler Thomas
Based digits
Jack Ward
>imagine being surprised every time lefties show you who they really are
Problem is you morons associate EVERY muslim as ISIS, therefore it turns into "we need to kill ALL muslims". See where this is going? Morons influenced by that rhetoric then proceeds to go out to massacre people like what happened in Christchurch. There needs to be restrictions in place against hate speech.
Logan Carter
>this is a Yank's brain after viewing Prager U
David Wright
Free speech has always been far right concept Jews have for eons tried to undermine and destroy it
Jose Kelly
Words can't hurt people you fucking faggots grow up. There use to be a time when saying the earth was round was considered "hate" speech against the church.
Owen Adams
And you think everyone who wants to cut off the immigration flood is a nazi who wants to kill 6 million jews and deserves to be violently suppressed, what's your point faggot?
Landon Young
>not strictly controlling speech means people will become right wing if only this were true
Adrian Moore
Free speech became a far right thing the instant someone on the right said something a leftist didn't agree with. The only solution to this is mass execution of leftists. That will happen in three to four generations.
Levi Diaz
>Since when did Free Speech... Since leftists became the establishment.
Aaron Cox
>If we didn’t have them, launch loops could proliferate around the equator.
Remember when MLK was organizing protests against NASA because it was a waste of money and we needed to give the money to retarded niggers instead?
We remember.
Xavier Ortiz
Your argument is reducing information, somehow leads to a better decision. Your calling me a moron? You will need a better argument than that shit for brains position.
Camden Harris
It's always been this way, anons. You can't have totalitarianism on both sides. One side has to actually be for freedom.
Camden Rodriguez
>Any right >Given
You failed.
Jack Peterson
every.time.
Easton Barnes
Checked
Lucas Lee
It's all so tiresome.
Cameron Price
>it becomes defined by its most dubious uses So... Where, in that logic, do you pressupose any time in history where limiting speech didn't get people killed? And where, then, can you not compare all socialist states to the granddaddy of socialism (and by proxy, communism)?
Angel Bailey
Oh shit, kekd and checked
Jayden Gutierrez
Free speech is antisemitic. Guard Your Tongue, by Rabbi Z. Pliskin
David Brown
fpbp
Nathan Rivera
Around the time that the internet became a popular platform for political discussion. Political speech needs to go through the corporate PC Jew filter first before it can be considered free speech.
>the granddaddy of socialism (and by proxy, communism) Socialism is technically older than Communism, in concept. Communism is just the ultimate expression of it.
Gabriel Peterson
>>A small number of Nazis protest somewhere, usually under the guise of freely expressing their opinions, and the police protect them under a mandate of upholding the First Amendment. By bolstering the narrative that speech should be protected at all costs, the police help smuggle white supremacist thought, policy, and action into the mainstream.
Translation: People who don't agree with what I think are expressing their thoughts to others and they might convince them. The law allows them do do this and it's wrong.
>>What I’ve found through my research and reporting is that free speech has become a rhetorical tool to elide something much more sinister: the state’s support and protection of white supremacists, and this country’s unwillingness to grapple with its racism.
Translation: This hit piece is a rhetorical tool to stifle free speech.
>>I’ve been disheartened to see not only conservatives and fascists but also liberals criticizing those who protest against the free speech rights of the most vile groups in America.
Translation: You cattle need to get in line!
>>Their argument usually harks back to the oft-misattributed quote: “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” Their reasoning makes clear that most of the USA has a deep misunderstanding of what free speech means.
Translation: I am trying to confuse you into thinking "free speech" shouldn't be free.
Matthew Scott
>>The billion-dollar investment in what is essentially right-wing propaganda has worked: We no longer think of free speech logically or accurately. Is a college protest over a conservative speaker really a violation of free speech? What about the college students’ right to protest—is that not as important a free speech issue? Colleges are already some of the most restrictive speech environments in the world, deciding who can enter the campus via an admissions process, what gets taught in every classroom, and who gets to teach it.
Translation: FUCK YOU Yas Forums !
>>Is my rejection from UC Berkeley a free speech violation? I might disagree with their decision, but no, it’s not. I don’t expect to be invited to conservative Christian universities, and I don’t view that as a violation of my free speech either. Why should conservatives expect an open invitation wherever they please?
Translation: FUCK YOU GOY!
Ethan Fisher
Of course a Jew wrote that
Hudson Smith
SCOTUS already said there is no hate speech exception. Hate Speech is free speech.
But the commies coming from leftist college don't like that.
Benjamin Butler
Where is this rightwing terrorism?
Adrian Diaz
>Since when did Free Speech became a "far right" concept Yas Forums? When disagreement became "problematic".
Evan Miller
(You)
Joseph Jackson
I agree we need to start rounding up people like this author for their traitorous subversion.
Grayson Butler
Fuck Muslims.
Mason Wright
>Free speech does not equal hate speech. Yes it does and this is why we're no longer a part of your country.
