13 years old

> Breasts are automatically sexual objects
For all you know he was testing how much of a degenerate you were

You wouldn't

three blows and her gate opens?

Attached: 7fe79ec81ada13b51554b3bed4653d85.jpg (564x846, 93.38K)

Her college sucked, though. She studied Japanese there but they only taught her how to speak it, she can't read.

Someone post the chart.

I've met a 13 years old with bigger boobs.

Wasn't she 14?

Anyway, girls in my country have more "mature" bodies than Eva's girls, so this is not a problem.

To be fair I can read German but hearing and speaking it is incredibly hard
Fuck kanji though

Attached: peak performance.jpg (960x767, 65.18K)

One of the girls I knew in middle school had huge tits.
Naturally, she was rather popular with the boys, but had a small circle of female friends.

Attached: 1579280643534.jpg (512x800, 45.02K)

>nippon education system
>raised in Germany
I think the point is that she was educated in a civilized part of the world, not 'Murrica.

>not 'Murrica
Huh?
I learned about Jericho in Sunday School.

renowned Murrican schools are filled with abroad students though

>22
yike

>is forced to learn about "our Christian myths" in school
>mocks that it's optional in a superior nation

Stay mad cuck

is that way

Attached: memetic hazard.gif (500x500, 131.69K)

Huh?
There is no obligation to attend Sunday School; it's a service provided by the church.
If a person isn't interested in attending church, then they'll obviously won't be attending Sunday School either.
Isn't this a good thing? There's no reason why Christian doctrine or mythology should be taught in public schools.

probably a buttmad fedora angry his shitty movement fell apart in 2012

Asuka is a confirmed titty monster.

Attached: azucar1241234.jpg (736x1037, 335.68K)

>is forced to learn about "our Christian myths" in school
> There's no reason why Christian doctrine or mythology should be taught in public schools.
Understanding that shit gives you a good basis for understanding the context centuries of art was created in. It's called "cultural literacy", and is taught not only for Christian shit, but all kinds of myths, including Babylonian, Ancient Greek/Roman, Nordic/Germanic, Jewish, Islamic, Eastern Asian and so on.
There is a difference between telling you what people believe or believed and indoctrinating you to believe it yourself. Just like physics and chemistry should tell you about the errata of science in the past. (Ever heard of phlogiston?)

Reddit is inherently American, retard.

>Reddit is inherently American,
No one said it wasn't, sperglord

>Understanding that shit gives you a good basis for understanding the context centuries of art was created in. It's called "cultural literacy",
Is that really necessary though?
There are certain fields in which compulsory education are beneficial (chief among which is physical education), but it shouldn't be assumed that mandatory education is always a good thing. Not the least because, when the education is undertaken as a matter of compulsion rather than leisure, it instills resentment in the pupil. Moreover, does the trash collector need to be "culturally literate"? Does it enrich his life to have someone else's notion of culture foisted upon him? I don't think so.

>Just like physics and chemistry should tell you about the errata of science in the past. (Ever heard of phlogiston?)
I have mixed feelings about this.
To a certain degree, it is useful to know how the field proceeded from its humble beginnings, but a doctor doesn't need to learn about Galen to effectively practice medicine. In some cases such education can even be harmful. Just look at how the field of psychology still struggles with Frued's half-baked hypotheses several years after his death and after his being almost university decried as a crackpot charlatan.
Astrology is more useful than Freud's psychoanalysis.
Midwits like to hoard errata and bits of trivia because it allows them to impress the dimwits of society, but this is a poor substitution for genuine learning.

Any more recent studies? 1995 is a bit of a long time

Do you really need a study to prove what you know in your bones to be true?

Attached: 1575300388303.jpg (752x1062, 74.48K)

when i was in grade 6, a hot girl at my school had tits that big. she wasn't even fat, just hot.

Nah, but more recent studies are good for when normalfags ask for sources

Based but where was the study conducted?

>Is that really necessary though?
It certainly helps and gives a more complete picture. And as that cultural background is usually not taught separately (there are no "culture classes"), but whenever it benefits the subject that's being discussed anyway. It's when you're debating a piece of literature, for example, or a painting, when a good teacher would provide that kind of context.

>does the trash collector need to be "culturally literate"? Does it enrich his life to have someone else's notion of culture foisted upon him?
That depends on whether or not you're a proponent of the ideals of enlightenment and desire intellectually independent citizens. The societas civilis does profit from broad cultural literacy.
Furthermore, not everyone will receive that full force of education in every country. Take Germany, for example, where the trash collector would never have visited a Gymnasium, but attended a Hauptschule. Or France, where he would never have gone on to a lycée.

>Midwits like to hoard errata and bits of trivia because it allows them to impress the dimwits of society, but this is a poor substitution for genuine learning.
It's an important part of the philosophy of science, as it does teach us of the weakness of the scientific method, and makes us reconsider whether or not the status quo will one day turn out to be mistaken. It also helps massively to understand a field of science itself. Of course, whenever those errata are taught, it should be elaborated on that and why they turned out to be the wrong approach.

Asuka graduated college in the US tho.
Anyways I (accidently) touched 14yo titty today while play wrestling so instrumentality holds no fear for me.

Asuka got screwed over the worst of every character in the show

Thots deserve the rope

>human female
whats the point

I really doubt >90% of males find 13 yo girls attractive, if that were true pedos wouldn't get shanked as much as they do in jail

13 year olds are not children. They're mid-puberty. Lots of them look fully grown-up.

>That depends on whether or not you're a proponent of the ideals of enlightenment and desire intellectually independent citizens.
No and yes.
Although there were some important advances in the era, the enlightenment was not the pristine, "enlightened" thing it's made out to be. I do think that citizens should be educated and, as you put it "intellectually independent." But that phrase there is important. You don't create "intellectually independent citizens" through compulsory education. You can see the inherent contradiction right? An independent person isn't under compulsion.
>The societas civilis does profit from broad cultural literacy.
Ehh... society benefits from people being on the same page, or, as I prefer, "pushing in the same direction." Members of society should be interconnected and be working from a shared cultural framework, but under such conditions they'll be learning the things they need to know without compulsion. For example, a person who spends any length of time here on Yas Forums is going to learn things about the culture here simply by being a part of it. Even without seeing the shows, people will learn the basic tropes and plot points of Haruhi et al..

>Take Germany, for example, where the trash collector would never have visited a Gymnasium,
>visited a Gymnasium
If only.
I would be 100% down for compulsory attendance at an open air, nude, body-building school.
Compulsory physical education is the only form of compulsory education with no drawbacks.

>It's an important part of the philosophy of science,
It could be if it were taught impartially and earnestly, but as it stands the background errata that is taught tends to be incomplete.
People are frequently taught about Sir Isaac Newton and his contributions to the progress of science.
They are less frequently taught about his interest in esotericism.
If you want to read Newton's translation of The Emerald Tablet of Hermes, you have to read it on your own time.

Attached: tEToHIN.png (832x826, 81.91K)

implying age in anime is accurate.

2020 would say 10yo boys would be sexier. I mean this world went to shit. faggots everywhere

The cholos only get shanked so they can get isekaid.

>implying >90% of males wouldn't find pic related attractive

Attached: 7535166112469.jpg (4896x7190, 2.38M)

>the world sucks because of gay people
rent free

the world sucks because people who are dumb enough to eat bats are allowed to live.

that's a drawing though, normal 13 yo don't look like that and also something is very wrong with her right leg

>Shinji says this
>Asuka thinks he's finally starting to get it and will come over and ravage her
>Instead he grabs a trumpet and starts loudly blowing the theme song at the door

>normal 13 yo don't look like that
The hot ones do.
>something is very wrong with her right leg
Yeah, I'm not really sure what happened when they drew it.
But I'd still fuck a girl with a broken thigh bone.

Attached: 1538019142165.jpg (1161x1618, 366.88K)

>some important advances in the era
Enlightenment is not just an era, it's an ideology. A few slightly different ideologies, actually. Voltaire's enlightenment is more of a sociocultural thing, whereas Kant's is a very individualistic academic approach to knowledge. Either way, it's something that is still very present today, especially in the minds of educators.
>You don't create "intellectually independent citizens" through compulsory education.
Right. But education is not compulsory. While attendance to school is mandatory in most civilized countries, you can always opt out of being educated. What's important is that education is available if you want it.

>Members of society should be interconnected and be working from a shared cultural framework
That sounds a lot like Plato's Politeia. Maybe less strict, overall. But it comes with its own set of problems. Mainly, it will not provide individuals with many opportunities to grow beyond their status and learn what they might be interested in.

>an open air, nude, body-building school.
Germany Gymnasiums are not the idyllic places you imagine them to be. Classes are not held outside, mostly not very physical and being naked is actively discouraged.

>It could be if it were taught impartially and earnestly, but as it stands the background errata that is taught tends to be incomplete.
That is true, but there is simply not enough time to go through all the history of science with all its absurdities in the few years schools have and with all the other knowledge and methods that have to be taught. It is nonetheless important to teach that science and scientists are not perfect and make grave errors.

>[french horn noises] Za~ankoku na tenshi no yo~u ni

Attached: 1.jpg (300x168, 6.73K)

>Asuka slams the door open to tell him to shut up
>"Hey, it worked! I guess the walls came tumbling down!"
>Asuka just stand there stupified for 10 minutes

>While attendance to school is mandatory in most civilized countries, you can always opt out of being educated.
I mean, you are technically correct.
A person can just daydream while in class, but this is a waste of that person's time and the financial resources of the district.

>Germany Gymnasiums are not the idyllic places
Yeah, I was being flippant.
An actual, Grek gymnasium would be a good thing.
This might be the case where I concede that broader cultural understanding is a good thing, because words whose definitions defy their etymologies is a major pet peeve for me. But plebs are gonna pleb, so I should probably just let it go.

>Mainly, it will not provide individuals with many opportunities to grow beyond their status and learn what they might be interested in.
If people have free time, they have the opportunity to learn. This is especially true in the modern age with widespread access to the Internet. If a person has a genuine desire to learn, they have untold resources at their fingertips.

>but there is simply not enough time to go through all the history of science with all its absurdities in the few years schools have
Which is why I advocate for a more direct approach to public education.
Physical education should be at the forefront, followed up by civics and rhetoric. History and culture will be learned organically either as relevant side pieces to the above, or by being immersed in the culture.

>It is nonetheless important to teach that science and scientists are not perfect and make grave errors.
Honestly, I feel that it baked into the scientific method. It's very intuitive.
We only have a problem with this because so much effort is put into convincing people that they should "stay in their lane" and trust what the so-called "experts" have to say.
It obviously doesn't help that many peer review journals are pay-walled, but that's not really a problem with public education.

Attached: gymnosophist.jpg (1056x601, 329.57K)

It's beautiful isn't it?

Attached: 1579194392211.jpg (1080x1520, 303.44K)

wish I could contribute but I don't dare store this shit on my PC

>12 years old

Attached: Mumei.png (580x966, 201.19K)