Ethereum or Bitcoin?

bitcoin is the only real crypto.
the only one that is trustless permissionless and secure. the only one that is byzantine fault tolerant while decentralized.

bch and bchsv are the worst order of shitcoins.

Blocklet cope

Both, certainly, i'll split them according to market share. 65% btc. Also, remember, BTC future has only 2 posible outcomes, either it utterly fails, reaching zero value, which kinda means total failure for cryptocurrencies, or it reaches 1 million usd due to inflation reaching zero and massive amount of fiat worldwide

Based

muh use case

Right now? Bitcoin.

Yes.

Bitcoin has always been the leader with ether riding on it's coat tails. I honestly think the only reason people get into ether is because the low price/ether makes them feel rich.

80% btc
20% eth
or 75/25

ethereum in 2020, trade it back to btc after the pump (0.05 ratio min.)

Other way around man. When eth 2.0 launches it will be in its infancy in terms of development. Meanwhile Bitcoin's era starts right meow.

This

every shitcoin has a "use case" bitcoin has consensus and security and a unique history you can't just hijack with your half assed bloatware hashlet chain.

bitcoin has the most potential long term, it already has so much momentum behind it, it HAS to go somewhere

Bitcoin doesn't say do this or that. It simply is. Just because people decided to put weather data and music on it doesnt put it in a box. Think of something. Can it benefit using blockchain or do you just want to because you can? Use Bitcoin.

Uploading big ass titties on Bitcoin might be stupid to you, but to someone else it isn't and the miners don't care as long as they get paid.

>Can it benefit using blockchain or do you just want to because you can?
the answer is no, blockchain sucks ass there is only one job it can do that other tech can't do better and it is doing it on bitcoin by providing mechanism for byzantine fault tolerant consensus on a distributed ledger. that's it. blockchain is the most useless over hyped bullish piece of tech otherwise. this includes all shitcoins obviously especially shitcoin sv.

*bullshit piece of tech

>Ethereum for transactions

Attached: D135E0EA-21FE-4E1C-839C-A334DECC0F6A.jpg (229x221, 13.39K)

I'm literally looking at using SV for vehicle logs in my company. Or a complete waste of time in your opinion.

>ignorance
the post
choose any other blockchain user. assuming creg were trustworthy (he isn't), do you really need immutable vehicle logs?

Attached: 48FD1101-A208-41A0-BB38-B9F071FD07F9.png (657x539, 110.46K)

what a fitting avatar you choose.

SV is far more attractive than other blockchains for this, especially more so than btc.

absolutely bollocks man, relational databases are about a quadrillion times more efficient and better performing than idiotic blockchains.
they can't do what bitcoin does but they don't really need to.

Neither of them are actually worthwhile as a store of value. Until blockchain currencies are more widely accepted and stable, they're universally just speculation pools in which you try to get the upper hand on your fellow speculators. It's a much smarter form of gambling than going to a casino but it's still just gambling.

storing unverifiable bullshit data that is a private concern on a public blockchain is the definition of mental illness.

Logs aren't even data heavy, dude. SV is chosen entirely because its well, bitcoin ffs. It has all the proper incentives Satoshi baked in to keep it secure in the long run. I understand that it's a hashlet now. I don't believe that will be the case in the future. Secondly there is no issue with throughput and we don't have to compete with other users for blockspace. Fees remain predictable and the protocol is set. I couldn't imagine trying to develop anything at all for btc or eth. Both are brazenly saying they are changing protocols in the future or testing theoretical systems for their primary scaling solutions, plus they're expensive to use and throughput and fees are unpredictable. SV is simple. That's what I want.