It's not looking good..
It's not looking good
>miners actually making money from fees and not just block subsidies is a bad thing.
>has no understanding to think further than one second in the future
>thinking someone gives a fuck about paying $5 to move literally a billion dollars
wew
good luck with that future. You have any idea how many tx's bsv needs to break even with btc for fees? dont forget to factor in the huge costs for storage that don't exist in btc.
bsv is a failure just like creg. The economics support btc.
You have any idea what bitcoin even was made for?
...
let me guess... to be censorable, freezable one world currency glow-nigger bucks?
or wait.... to be an overly-expensive prunable cloud storage that pretends to be immutable?
wait, an argument for BSV is that it has a lower transaction cost than BTC? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
delete this
Coin is $BSV (satoshis vision) for you new fags who want to buys
>MUH FEE MARKET
Don't tell these people to buy a shit token the fuck is wrong with you
op you are wasting your time commies can't into economics
btc is commiecoin now expecting the rich to pay their big ass fees when no minted coins for miners
you guys have been saying this for literally a decade now
>faketoshi
You made your 5 rupees now fuck off shitters
Holy fucking kek
He should've just gone a the direct approach they always do, saying Bitcoin was supposed to be a digital payment system/digital cash (while underlining the subtitle of the white paper in a screenshot), and that it was never intended as digital gold...
Surely Satoshi certainly never said anything like that...
the network isn't even up anymore retard.
To be a censored weather app database?
In 2145?
try this one or the next
1mb blocks provide on average a paltry 0.3 btc in fees (the most recent one provided 0.17)
at these prices farms will begin to lose money
and with blockstream's genius of communist economics, removing farms ensures only people with raspberries get to mine and that means nobody has competing hash power, so low security.
btc is currently secure because of competing large farms with massive hash power
it would cost millions of $ to set one up and take control but far cheaper if everyone is using a pi
an old farm could just spin up randomly in 10 years and do whatever they want.
either a saudi prince comes and starts market buying btc pumping the price (muh tax the rich!), or it's literally dead.
bsv is the last chance for crypto or it's all over
>1mb blocks provide on average a paltry 0.3 btc in fees (the most recent one provided 0.17)
wat
that post includes the 12.5 minted coins idiot and 0.6 btc from fees (the posts is 2 years old)
go look at fee rewards from today lol
this! only bitcoin miners make any serious amount in fees. shitforks are fucked.
Doge has much cheaper transaction fees. DOGE $1,000,000 by 2022!!!!!! BTC btfo!!
>paying $5 in fees to buy a candy bar.
>pruning means transactions are mutable
why would you do a slow and expensive on-chain for a candy bar? why not use lightning? doesn't make any sense...
now if you want to transfer a few thousand to a million dollars you use on-chain.
you wouldn't know... but most importantly the immutability requires it to be byzantine fault tolerant and the minority hash shitforks are not.
definitely not weather data ....
Bitcoin transactions are near instant and cheaper (and more fraud resistant) than any credit card you've ever heard of.
You can't prune transactions. That's the point. You can prune other shit, but there will always be a record.
4u
and why wouldn't the millionaire use lightning if it's cheaper?
>because it doesn't work