From my observations, biological problems tend to be more difficult to tackle than physical ones. Let's use mat. sci. as an example. Materials science is a field that leads a lot of the recent advances we've seen in technology, and it is a thoroughly researched and well-understood field. There are certainly niche areas within the field that are prime for new research, but we're at the stage where we can use supercompute clusters to simulate new materials and their properties en-masse, isolate the interesting candidates, and then synthesize and characterize them. Straightforward, no difficult hurdles to jump through when testing or acquiring specimens, few risky side effects, high levels of repeatability and uniformity and therefore easy to falsify. Compare that to biology (excluding computational biologists, they're lifting up the field). I think a lot of physical science fields can be viewed in a similar light. While we're bounded by physics, with enough R&D, as long as it's physical, we can probably engineer a solution.
>cold fusion It's worth nothing. The reason fusion is difficult to replicate on Earth is because it requires temperatures and pressures that are only constantly maintained in stellar-mass-sized objects. Even at those temperatures and pressures, fusion would not be possible following classical (Newtonian) mechanics. It's intrinsically rooted in a quantum mechanical phenomenon (tunneling) with a very low probability. The upside is that the sheer number of near-collision events occurring in a star's core is so high (because it is so large and massive), that even with a low probability of occurring, fusion is still possible. Cold fusion is quite literally antithetical to this process.
Based.
Camden Williams
It might take an additional week. I wouldn't be so sure of anything.
You could be right, but Q2 earnings are still far out and nothing to worry about yet.
Direction and trend will most likely be set this week though.
Charles Hughes
My GE puts are gonna be assigned...
Lincoln Gonzalez
This book takes aim at the efficient market hypothesis, which states that prices reflect all available information.
Shiller conclusivley shows that prices/markets, particularly in equities, are far more speculative and divorced from reality than the theory suggests they should be, and that this leads to rushes, panics and crashes.
It mostly dissects the psychology of investors and how this manifests in the aggregate, specifically asset bubbles. As you would expect, the conclusion is that investors are skitish and prone to group think, so large scale market deviation from underlying/realistic prices (specifically things like p/e ratio or volatiliy that is disproportional) periodically takes place.
May 15th they're gonna re-open parts of New York. My guess the rest of the U.S will follow soon enough based on how it goes.
Jonathan Gutierrez
somebody on the other thread said a lot of big companies are reporting earnings this week. isn't this a huge bullish sign since they have already announced they are reporting earnings and not losses. thinking of going all in before those earnings are reported (just avoid stocks where they are reporting losses)
Michael Walker
Hey why isn't Robin hood letting me buy? Its 2PM Central here
Zachary Howard
Not sure if clinically retarded or merely pretending.jpg
Jeremiah Williams
If this were true Tesla and Uber would never announce anything for shareholders.
Josiah Williams
Ready for the moon mission USO chads?
Ian Adams
Everyone, look into BWXT
They provide nuclear material and reactors to the US navy and to the DOE and commercial reactors. Also have a role in providing reactors for NASA.
>BWXT owns and operates the only high value high hazard facilities capable of designing, manufacturing and testing specialty mission critical, precision tolerance high hazard components for U.S. government, commercial and university customers. Our chief objective in operating these facilities is safe, secure, on-time delivery of high quality mission-critical products in a cost-effective manner.
You guys wanted a play on suppliers for space and defense and you got it. As the US gears up for a naval arms race with China, BWXT is gonna benefit. As commercial reactors gain steam, BWXT is gonna benefit.
As long as I don't have to see or here from the crypto children around here I am happy.
Jace Roberts
smg is the invader to biz, not shitcoins. >nothing about boomer rocks Nothing but schizoposting and cancer in those threads
Angel Myers
I just put "/smg/" in the search bar it and hides everything else automatically.
Jeremiah Garcia
Careful bro! This is a Jewish financial trick that has plagued Western economics for centuries. Carefully look at previous earnings reports and check if there is a little line before the amount listed (looks like this: - ). This is a secret Hebraic code that indicates that the reported earnings were actually losses. This little trick lets the Chosen People (and Goyim in the know) avoid companies that are actually doing poorly while the majority of the cattle investors obliviously buy everything they can afford.
Logan Watson
After desperately trying to find a non-CFD broker I’ve settled on saxo. Now I just have to wait for my bennies to come in so I can shove in the remaining 430 needed to activate my account. From there it’s the earning week roller coaster and hopefully I get enough to gain access to futures trading for when oil goes negative again.
What do people think of municipal bonds? They have high yields but they cannot print money like the fed. They will probably try to issue a ton more in a frenzy to pay for stuff but it will all come crashing down when they can't pay out. States are going bankrupt.
ET goes ex dividend 06 May. Will probably dump hard when it does since there probably a good number of people trying to farm the dividend but don't think they'll be able to maintain it so they'll exit right after. Happened to USAC on Friday. I got my ET at $5 so I'm just gonna hol dit and buy more ifit dips.
Michael Morris
After last thread you should probably add "music" to the list.
Robert Robinson
>As commercial reactors gain steam, BWXT is gonna benefit. Do they in USA? At least in Europe leftist governments all shutdown the nuclear reactors.
Connor Garcia
Because you're 25k in it?
Grayson Lee
>municipal bonds
ponzi scheme scam. They issue these bonds knowing that eventually they will not be able to pay.
Connor Cruz
reminder to BUY CHEAP WHORES and FUCK EXPENSIVE STOCKS
We have the same problem. Do your part. Toss a hippie into a reactor today.
Hudson Mitchell
Also my other space plays are looking to be LMT TDY and RTX.
You're gonna see huge amounts of government money go into this, and if you are gonna have a moon base, it's gonna need a reactor because the moon has a night that lasts 14 days, solar cells and batteries just can't support that. And BWXT is gonna be making that reactor.
LMT is making the Orion capsule and is a solid defense contractor all around. If the US government is doing something with space, LMT is behind it
Teledyne- Make instruments and sensors that are on basically every space craft, Hubble, Curiosity and the ISS. They make acquisitions like crazy and have great growth potential
RTX- Collins and Raytheon both have space segments, Collins does life support and other bits and bobs. They also have a satellite constellation I think. Lots of their income comes from space. Also a great growth opportunity and is gonna be a titan of defense.
They're American. Have some operations in canada. People have a lot of faith in nuclear here. This is the best play for it. BWXT.
Camden Gomez
That's pretty high risk. Are you seriously convinced of the business model of that company?
Hudson Martin
Long term? Absolutely not. But this is a short term play.
