LINK

Predictions for next month? Will we finally moon?

Attached: 486A5EB5-3CC4-4AF5-9942-F10B0B8265F8.jpg (773x710, 128.42K)

It’ll “moon” to $5 then dump back to 2.50. Rinse and repeat until sometime in mid 2026 when you realize your altcoin is never going to $1000 (much less $20).

Once sergey has consumed all API data points we will moon

Yeah, should dump back to $2 or $2.50 then maybe moon again.

>pumps 80% two weeks ago
>wHeN wiLl chAinlinK mOon? :(
Biz has memory of a goldfish

considering the google partnership was confirmed fake and the team exposed as fraudulent liars... never

Attached: chainlink-confirmed-fake-partnerships.png (605x608, 72.74K)

Nooooooo reeeeeeeee checked.

Attached: 1584824636777.png (554x830, 1022.37K)

>Predictions for next month
$5-$10

>t.retard

4.20 and back to 3.70

The whole market is based on hype and the link hype has been killed by FUD.
$0.90 next month.

Link is going to 1.50 id sell everything now and get back in tomorrow

It’ll go to 20$ for fucking sure m8

Attached: CB9FA3CE-FFEF-4686-8030-696E7FF05B2B.jpg (2405x2168, 2.2M)

IPX of TACHYON don't just dump anyhow...Stake IPX today
In our bids to arouse the interest of the best node operators as well as to get the Network active and functioning, @TACHYON staking reward will be doubled for a period of 6 months from 5% to 10%.

do you seriously believe this shitty chart?
tell me, just think for a second, whay explains the gaps between the ranks? why is rank 11, hundred times smaller than rank 1, it makes no sense, you're implying that each rank will always keep the same distance from the rank over and under it....
you could have rank 1 to 5 all have like almost the same mcap with a difference of few bucks and it would still be viable... what prevents link from being 80$ at rank 10? and just have the rest like be over 80$ and still keep the sa&me total crypto mcpap?

it just makes no sense

That faggot is fudding because he has link buy orders around $2. But you already know that

its almost like it says that at the bottom of the image user

well doesnt change the fact that its completely retarded

>smart contracts need off chain data from apis
>data gets on to blockchain via middleware called oracles
>current oracles are centralized defeating the purpose of blockchain (trustless, immutable ledger, no single point of failure, etc.)
>chainlink proposes decentralized oracle network comprised of independent nodes
>contract exists on chain
>contract calls chainlink contract
>chainlink contract gives nodes on oracle network orders
>nodes query relevant apis from (not necessarily) disparate sources for data
>apis return data to nodes
>nodes aggregate data with algorithms that return accurate data despite potentially faulty nodes (aggregation algorithms and their proofs are technical, just go slow/be patient and look up relevant terms)
>aggregated data is returned to contracts on chain
>contract executes according to conditions satisfied by the returned data
>nodes build reputation by several reliability metrics
>node uptime and timliness in query reponse
>correct data reported
>number of contracts offered to node
>number of filled contracts
>>number of correctly filled contracts
>average node response time
>penalty payments offered (nodes may or may not be required to stake LINK as collateral in case data they report is incorrect and causes faulty execution of a contract)
>LINK token is used both to pay node operators for successfully filling an on chain request and as collateral/penalty payment for serving up faulty/incorrect/fraudulent data to an on chain contract
>nodes can also operate on intel SGX "trusted hardware" that allows them to parse contract related data in a private environment or to perform calculations with that data in private (some users may not want certain calculations or transactions to appear on a public blockchain)

Attached: 1563449551804.jpg (1067x1600, 131.91K)

no, there is an issue
>nodes aggregate data with algorithms that return accurate data despite potentially faulty nodes (aggregation algorithms and their proofs are technical, just go slow/be patient and look up relevant terms)

no, it's actually the smart contract onchain that does the aggregation, it's called an aggregation contract

$5.20 then down to $4.25

Link is a something serger

Attached: 179CD7F20096474D87D8A77760136743.jpg (390x280, 17.93K)

This. Make your own in excel in 2 minutes and it's way more easy to see. For perspective, xrp's ATH mcap was $140 billion and had a total mcap share of nearly 18%.
Eth's peak total mcap share was 12.7%, BCH's 6%, fucking ADA got to 3%.

Attached: 1563599281153.jpg (362x365, 129.91K)

>It’ll go to 20$
No step to 10 usd before?

We are going to bleed SATs down to 45k range while BTC slowly climbs over next 2 weeks. USD price will remain mostly stable. Sometime late May you will see link jump to 120k SATs, roughly $11-$12

>We are going to bleed SATs down to 45k range while BTC slowly climbs over next 2 weeks. USD price will remain mostly stable
why this Link bro?

>We are going to bleed SATs down to 45k range while BTC slowly climbs over next 2 weeks. USD price will remain mostly stable
why this Link bro?

sick meme brah

when $50 link tho?

80% is impressive if you have 100k+ invested in LINK. We're talking 800% at least.

1

Sergey we really need you to pump this above 52000 man I'm down on my SATs a lot

Heres more bullshit at the bottom of this post to make it look like I'm posting something