Open Oracle is literally a COMPETING standard

>a fucking token

>The token is an oracle protocol

Attached: 55903EA3-710F-467E-8DB0-AE5B397BD378.png (230x219, 7.03K)

Like the Coinbase guy said: Coinbase's signed API system is a "trusted input" for Chainlink's "oracle system".

A trusted input... on the OpenOracle protocol. OpenOracle is like http. I wondering if the CL project has ever proposed a different one.

You're not quite getting it.

All this coinbase thing does is allow end users (downstream from the contract-serving oracle) to cryptographically verify that the source used by the contract-serving oracle was indeed Coinbase (in this case).

When you think about it, all data sources/APIs should sign their data, it makes using Chainlink so much more secure.

Will LINK go back down after BTC halving and then shoot back up? I wanna buy in at $3.50, ideally lower.

Why do people say they could have used a more LINK-friendly option then? Was there ANY alternative for CoinBase to use that would have been more bullish for us?

You would have to be a retard to invest in ChainLink on the basis of weekly price movements. If the upside is higher than the downside, you buy. Or else risk getting left behind the instant Forbes publishes an article.

The content is literal garbage written by someone that doesn't even grasp that Chainlink is a decentralized Oracle NETWORK. It's not worth addressing.

these guys are actively spamming the board with link FUD for over a week now and this is the best they can find lol

fud that is disproven time and time again and they have nothing else to come up with