"I know we're under time pressure but we run the risk of shipping something expensively broken."
To dispel the FUD to begin with, he also says: "I am not familiar with the details of this code...".
For reference, Samsondav is a newer dev with the Chainlink team. What did he mean about shipping? In dev speak this means a new release is coming. What did he mean about time pressure? If it were a simple version release, why would they be under so much time pressure? Why would it be potentially so expensive to fix?
It means you can't sit on the toilet for 3 years when competition can put a product out in mere months.
Camden Garcia
His last line is the most bearish thing ive read in 3 years. Just market sold my stack.
Tyler Richardson
No no sir, you can spend your entire life on the street.
Joseph James
Extremely bearish. I hold 10k and I'm not selling, but it's a painful reminder that this was never a sure thing and always has been a gamble. Will hold to 0 if it happens since I'm willing to take the gamble, it just sucks knowing this could easily fail.
William Ward
You have an internal dev questioning the entire design of the system...if thats not bearish I dont know what else could be
Blake Powell
Based street poster
Zachary Davis
first legitimate fud in years
Kayden Bennett
Damn gonna sell my 10k stack now I guess 25x was all I was supposed to get :'(
Camden Hughes
>code rewrite >bearish
hello pleb
Juan Russell
It is bearish no doubt. If I was broke and all my worth was in LINK this would terrify me. As it stands I have 10k link with 22k in cash in a bank account. I'm not threatened, but it hurts to see this.
Tyler Bailey
I've been saying this a lot, smart money jumped ship @ 4,4~, next months will be swing trading untill capitulation @ ICO price
Dylan White
This is a horrifying development. An internal dev admitting that the entire Chainlink product is fundamentally broken? Fuck this, I'm out. Selling now.
Dylan Clark
Omg i knew it, sold my stack
Jaxon Clark
I’m tethering up for now until this is cleared up.
Cameron Reyes
Lmao at all the bears in here. For anyone new reading this and getting scared: buy more Chainlink. May will be exciting.
so is this fud stronger or weaker than a pornstar managing company funds
Nathan Roberts
He is talking about a smartcontract,not about chainlink itself you absolute brainlet
Brandon Gomez
codefag here elegant designs are good but not necessary more complexity more chance for buggy mess however if they know what they are doing it will be fine which it will considering chainlink went through security audits from outside
Bentley Anderson
cope
Thomas Myers
You have a dev questioning the entire design of the system and a former porn actress managing the majority of Chainlink funds. What could possibly go wrong?
Jonathan Jenkins
It’s not literal time retards. He’s referring to the time-complexity of the data structure. He’s saying it can be optimized, such that the network performs more optimally.
This is why you’re just anons lmao
Owen Wood
>a dev questioning the entire design of the system He's talking about that one contract system (fluxaggregator) you derp.
Henry Campbell
Almost decent FUD this time discord trannies
Dont forget to dilate , wouldnt want that axe wound healing up.