Tyler Winklevoss Loves Link

Listing is happening EOM. It's confirmed.

I trained my normie friends to hate cuckbase. The fees are exorbitant, and they shadow banned me. Now all my friends use Gemini and shit on kikebase.

If you're such as expert at training friends where to shit, you should go to Mumbai and give Pajeet a few lessons.

Based winkelboss

That's the point. We just spam stupid shit like $1k eoy and Sergey is the chosen one so people would dismiss it and stay away.

>bought 1% of bitcoin total supply at $100
>with the money from funding facebook
yeah tell me about it

>WINKLEVII

Attached: 1586887458968.png (600x800, 26.64K)

Comfy

Very

MY LINKIES STAY SUPER WINKIE 1K IS FUD

Attached: 634303794.jpg.0.jpg (1400x933, 138.25K)

Facebook would have made them more haha cucked

the comments after his tweet are surreal, it's like some kind of mutant relative of a Yas Forums thread

The winklevoss twins are the bogdanoffs of the past.

>-6%

CHECKED

Attached: 92B3E73A-1B51-4825-B67B-5F9260735956.png (750x775, 929.73K)

the absolute state of /biz

Thanks fren
Now pray to kek with me Shakepay didn't lose my ETH this morning

Attached: 1s1qq9~2.jpg (494x391, 72.43K)

Tyler please PLEASE PLEASE SHILL YOUR LINK BAGS. IM FUCKING DESPERATE.

It's over.

There's more 2018 marines in that thread than on biz now.

Pretty surreal tweet tho.

Wallah
Finally broadcasting
We're actually all gonna make it

Attached: 1586743315711.png (1305x663, 45.42K)

I'm a developer and I looked over the Chainlink white paper and documentation, as well as the blog post by Google. Here's a few reasons I would not use Chainlink for my own apps:
1. The current "mainnet" is not decentralized. there's no way to decentrally assess if an oracle is any good or not.
2. It took them 2 years to basically build centralized oracles, which is extremely unimpressive (and already exists). I do not have much hope for the future or the competency of their engineers.
3. The white paper doesn't coherently describe how they plan on making their centralized design decentralized one day. They broadly go over their "decentralized" reputation strategies as if creating sybil resistant decentralized reputation is something of an afterthought, when it's actually an unsolved computer science problem. They've had 2-3 years and 30mil in funding to actually publish technical specifications for this and instead they decided to build trivial centralized oracles. Extremely worrying. It kind of reminds me of IOTA "we'll remove the coordinator later". No you won't. You don't know how.
4. News outlet and journalists keep reporting on "partnerships" with Google and Swift. But if you actually read the source for the "partnership", it's just a blog post by Google Cloud that promotes their own service (BigQuery) and shows an example about how Chainlink users can use Google Cloud if they want. In no way is Google partnered or planning on using Chainlink themselves. The Chainlink codebase is extremely trivial to rebuild if Google wanted to get into the blockchain oracle space.
While there's certainly profits to be made by trading Chainlink, I recommend you do not HODL it with the hope that one day developers will adopt it as their source for decentralized oracles. That certainly won't happen.

Thousands of dollars? WOAH LINK $1K EOY CONFIRMED

link is only dumping right now because the winklevoss twins are looking for a good entry.

I suggest DCA'ing, frens.

Attached: 1510544347104.png (229x220, 12.36K)

great I'm sure your friends will pump all our bags to the moon
fuck off faggot

Wilnklevii are permacucks. Very bearish for btc and link.