The highest IQ post you'll ever see on Yas Forums

A common piece of advice you'll see for investing is "time in the market beats timing the market."
This is good advice and the root of nearly all large fortunes.

However

There is a little twist you can add that will help you time market cycles and do even better.
Remember that markets are just the result of people buying and selling. The market can be highly dependent on emotion in situations where real value inflows and outflows are difficult to measure (think a cryptocurrency) or relatively immune to emotion in situations where real overheads are significant and real demand is relatively well quantifiable (think traditional commodities).

Here's the gem: the more a market is like the former (without hard to adjust inflows and outflows) the more it is subject to market cycles. And market cycles in these situations are generally the result of the main investors forgetting the pain of loss (causing bull markets) and forgetting the euphoria of gains (causing bear markets). That is a biologic phenomenon. Markets driven by younger people will have shorter market cycles as their neurons are highly plastic; those driven by older investors tend to be longer as they have more memories and less neural plasticity.

As the most common investor of a given market's age increases, the market cycles get longer. Watch what happens with crypto as the people with big stacks get into their 30's/40's. And after the next boom bust cycle, remember this post.

Attached: 32452345234532.jpg (558x614, 17.67K)

That's kind of interesting OP. Did you come to this conclusion on your own? Are you implying we shouldn't sell too early if we get a new bull market?

Attached: 1586525726472.jpg (640x799, 107.01K)

I post a novel piece of information that gives away by-asset macro market cycles
Crickets
Biz man

I'm guessing you're pretty new to trading OP.

>kids are moving crypto markets
yeah no

Very interesting post op

aaaaaaaaaaand it’s another midwit. move it along folks. nothing to see. beginners can stay.

Where the fuck did you get a picture of my toilet?

Started with a hypothesis then looked into fMRI data to find age ranges for remodeling then tested it across various markets that had at least minimal data for median investor age.

It works.

I'm not stupid enough to be a trader. Read OP again.

Nothing in that post was insightful or interesting and the bit about young investors vs older investors was just straight up nonsense.

This is exactly incorrect and antithetical to my post. Can you read?
Good for you.

Glad to be here.
Glad you typed that.

Attached: 2016-10-23_10-55-02.jpg (914x600, 88.3K)

Jannies remove this samefag

>young investors vs older investors was just straight up nonsense.
Why? Because young investors don't have the capital to be whales and move markets?

this can be verified by plotting the time axis in log scale

Attached: 1569730820828.jpg (679x516, 28.88K)

Mind blowing, so we should buy low and sell high. If what you are saying is true we can expect prices to fluctuate over time going from low to high and vice versa. Instead of utilizing the power of compounding interest we could time the market and see even higher returns than with time in the market.

>Mind blowing
>buy low and sell high

Attached: ftge.gif (400x300, 1.32M)

Please
He didn't read and understand the post.
If you used a very mild log axis and an asset class with a known linearly progressing median investor age you see the light.
This is more of a piece of information that has high utility when making decisions where there are a few good options and you want to know which is best.

For example: let's say you have a good income and are DCAing into three different asset classes. Because you're smart and disciplined, you have a lot of each of those asset classes already and have a lopsided portfolio because one of the three has outperformed in the recent past. If you're looking to adjust your fiat allocation to balance your portfolio, this is a good tool to use to maximize gain while keeping the decreased volatility of diversification.

See my post below. If you think I'm just telling you to buy low and sell high you're missing the point.

>The market can be highly dependent on emotion
Here's my hot take: the market is ONLY dependent on emotion. You can gather all the data you want, charts, numbers, whatever - but in the end, what makes people buy and sell is the way they FEEL about that data. As you correctly stated, what makes you buy or sell is the memory of the pleasure of gains and the pain of loss. But this is valid to everything in life. Your brain doesn't work differently regarding financial markets that it does regarding anything else in life.

>very mild log axis
better yet, variablize the log axis so it can range from mild to hard core, then and add a sinusoid to tune it.
also, add some decomposition while youre at it because its not just the market participants average age, but also the number of participants that affects the cycles. just one of the two being constant will fit your hypothesis perfectly.

You are missing the poster.

Nice theory. I’m already in my 30s and definitely don’t trade my crypto ever. Learned that lesson in my 20s. Holding in crypto is very similar to riding the emotional waves of my 20s stock trading but I have the resolve now to stick with things I believe in because historically whenever I sold something I believed in I wound up regretting it. Anecdotally I align with your theory as someone who has been trading assets for the last 15 years.

I actually like this theory, I'm sure this has some relevance on markets for sure

Again, the fundamentals of a market determine how susceptible it is to emotion.
Milk and gas prices react very differently than btc to short term news.
That's reasonable.
Another thing I noticed when looking at some of the smaller asset classes is that the median age of wealth held in asset is what matters (as you would expect) not the median age of all investors. In other words if 1bn teenagers with 50 bucks to their name enter the stock market, it won't affect the periodicity of market cycles much but if a few rich boomers enter the crypto market it will.
Perhaps I am.
I think very similar things about myself though I've been immunized against most trading by watching smart friends go down that path and fail.

>Milk and gas prices react very differently than btc to short term news.
Absolutely, but concepts like supply, demand and elasticity only reflect people's emotions. In the end, an economy is only the way everyone feels like using their money.
I unironically learned this lesson watching South Park years ago. Season 13, episode 3. Check it out.

>Another thing I noticed when looking at some of the smaller asset classes
Show your data. Show where you are getting reliable data on the age of a person making a particular transaction.

Fucking lmao congrats on picking a very appropriate image in the OP.

Market cycles don't exist anymore, infinite QE has ushered in a new paradigm. Sorry OP, technology has caught up to your theory. This time it's just different.

>median age of wealth held in asset
yeah youre right. i guess rather than say "age + number" of participants, its better to put it as "age * weighted by influence".
as the asset class gets larger, decomposition doesnt show a clear cycle because i think the "influence factor" gets dispersed

Your hypothesis makes sense but I'm not sure there is necessarily as great of an age demographic shift in investment. I also believe the wisdom of not timing the market comes less from people's lack of understanding about cycles and more from externalities that become variables e.g. bat soup.