finextra.com/blogposting/18607/swifts-major-announcement-slips-under-the-radar >SWIFT have decided to take on the global card players, VISA and Mastercard, and have thrown their hats into the ring to become the global connector for account to account (A2A) payments. They announced: “SWIFT will enable instant and frictionless payments from account-to-account anywhere in the world, with an end-to-end solution that combines international and domestic capabilities. This ambitious platform expansion means SWIFT will support financial institutions to strengthen their positions in B2B payments and capture new volume in SME and consumer segments.”
>It is an understatement to say that this is a huge change of direction for SWIFT. Perhaps driven by the fact that as SWIFT is owned by the banks, the change of direction might enable the banks to take control of the interconnectivity of new instant payments schemes which are either live or rolling out all over the world. Currently there are two other major players moving rapidly to try to own this market, the aforementioned VISA and Mastercard, which are interestingly now not owned by the banks!
>I basically live in Mumbai and have not seen this. What a surprise.
Hunter Scott
Nice fud you fucking pajeet. Not selling.
Benjamin Nelson
This was posted a few days ago. By 2025 Chainlink will be used in nearly every transaction that takes place on the earth. $1k was fud. $10k is more like it. Exactly. I lurk but no longer redpill the masses. Its like teaching 10th grade math to 1st graders. A waste of time for everyone.
Henry Murphy
> coffee standard
Mason Bell
This isn't a FUD?
Nicholas Robinson
kek no, all partnerships have been proven fake already
>Swift Chainlink won some competition 3 years ago, literally not a single news since -> PROVEN FAKE >Google 1 blog post 10 months ago, never used on mainnet, nothing else since -> PROVEN FAKE >Oracle 10 months ago, gravelcoin, fernando demoted -> PROVEN FAKE >E&Y recent news, will be proven fake soon >Microsoft recent news, will be proven fake soon
Tyler Green
Delusional idiots think Swift is using a shit token
Cooper Cook
it was during a night user
Jacob Cooper
>it’s like teaching 10th grade math to 1st graders.
I rest my case.
Charles Rogers
Holy shit you are special. No one needs this shit for anything hence the lack of adoption. This board is full of hopium
SWIFT is jooish. ...why use Link and cut them in when they can just make their own?
Also Ripple has already BTFOd SWIFT.
Jaxson Sanders
I saw this several days ago but haven't seen a coherent response to the 2025 timeline. Is it for all transactions or just the beginning of use?
Jonathan Collins
i think that sergey's focus on defi rather than enterprise might be partially motivated by the intertia of large enterprise, he wants to get things going faster and he's trying to set a fire under their feet by potentially sucking value from cefi to defi
Isaiah Parker
Exactly this. Sergey gave us hopium in swift, banks and institutional lenders ... and instead we got SNX, kova and a Celer porno
Jacob Howard
>>Oracle >10 months ago, gravelcoin, fernando demoted -> PROVEN FAKE
it’s not about the token, it’s about the linking capability, and smart contracts with security.
it already has become impossible to say no to LINK for providers.. and all of these partners leveraging it...you can see health, law, other company related software starting to build integrations for it.
many other coins and people said they’d never use it and they ended up bending the knee.
they’re all going to integrate with it and the software platforms these partners own and will build in the future will all leverage chainlink technology. at first I was worried that LINK would just be used for the middleware with no real need to have them pump the price of LINK up because they’re just using ChainLink to transfer ETH/BTC etc.. but noooo.
because the nodes pay & fine in LINK.it requires LINK to operate.. which means more LINK is created each time a job runs, which means even if people don’t purchase the LINK directly, it is going to feed itself and exponentially grow when the workload is increased.
Ryder Morgan
where does all the anti-link sentiment originate from? Is it competitors, butthurt anons that don’t know they can still get in on it?
Trolls?
or Bank/Financial institutions scared Crypto is going to eat their lunch so they want to restrict Crypto to tokenization only.
my bet is the last one.
John Thompson
Accumulation
Anthony Ward
Imagine not knowing that LINK is banking with a defi service owned by an Israeli entrepreneur with a lending department full of IDF and Israeli MOD members.
I'd say some of it is genuine newfags who see the same jason parser fud from 2017 and think they're "in the know" and want to fit in by being an obligate contrarian nigger. Then you have people like uncleoldfag who fud to gatekeep. Then you have the actual glowniggers who run organized fud campaigns so they can consolidate it on their end
Caleb Bell
i fud because it's entertaining to bait sincere linkies who should just shut the fuck up and accumulate
Jackson Ramirez
It's important to keep in kind that WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER. Help and support your fellow linkies and we are all going to make it
Hudson Thompson
Can someone tell me what I’m missing here? I’m going through the article and the only thing I’m seeing here is iso standard. I’m not seeing anything related to link.
ib4 hurr durr iso standard is link. It’s not link it’s just a standard ,a spec that they want to be met
Blake Butler
You’re a fucking idiot or clever
Camden Ross
Read between the lines friend, you’ll see the rocket ship
I’m reading what’s writing. I’m not even seeing swift gpi
Benjamin Anderson
What happened is Chainlink used the ISO standard from Swift, and then pretended to have a partnership with them (lied). Linkers are too stupid to understand that Swift has nothing to do with Chainlink. Chainlink just used their standard (open standard that anyone can use for free without permission) and then claimed to have a partnership.
Sergey would actually be in jail for this if crypto was regulated like stocks.
Many are upset they spent months, maybe even years browsing the board seeing “but Chainlink” at $0.2, only for them to not listen or to chase other shitcoins. It’s only natural to show hatred or disdain towards those you are jealous of. Had they listened to us, even after all this market mayhem they would be up 10x. Personally, I understand the emotions they exemplify, it must be incredibly painful knowing what would have been. What’s even more painful is likely the realization that Linkies were ultimately right, that this is just the tip of the iceberg before SC mass adoption ushers in the 4IR. Imagine the pain that will be felt a year from now. Me personally? I can’t wait to read the heated threads
Carter Johnson
But do they not understand that link is still at an obscene discount and the real moonshot hasn't even begun? Dude. I bought at $1.50 and I'm not even mad. I'm actually very grateful that the stars aligned in my life for me to be able to buy a bag at this low of a price
Jace Kelly
swfit gpi will of course operate under ISO 20022, swift gpi is touted as being able to interface with any payments system or trading platform, including DLTs, since chainlink is becoming a standard of interoperability it's natural to think they fit in here, also gpi link is LITERALLY an oracle, chainlink developed "smart oracles" for swift, it's true there is no direct confirmation but that's the nature of speculation, and this is some solid fucking speculation
GPI link is of course Chainlink, the big question is whether or not anybody will use it, because there's not really a reason yet to give two fucks about DLT.
Jason Cooper
They likely fell for the same FUD I almost fell for. People touting “you missed out already bro” when it made its run from $0.15 to $0.5. I was super bummed, and believed them for awhile, felt like I had truly missed the boat. Ultimately it’s either one of two things. 1. Someone who truly doesn’t understand what LINK is and the implications it will have if successful or 2. People who do understand point 1 but don’t want people on the left side of the spectrum to get in on their investment.
Angel Green
I can see some people doing this because they’re worried that the news of LINK will get out and they don’t have the available funds to build a 10K stack yet and don’t want the ship to sail without them.
Angel Jenkins
The fundamental question is, when the tech is fully fleshed and developed, can DLT effectively reduce trust while simultaneously saving enterprises/corporations capital on the back end. My bet is yes. Gartner and Ernst Young would agree with me
