THIS LITTLE FUCKER RIGHT HERE

Not shilling, but urging to use available data.
Even ETC had better returns over past 2y.

start dcaing if you want, personally I believe every crypto will tank during this recession, might be wrong, still have a small make it stack I haven't sold just in case
easy way to figure it out is ask yourself how much bitcoin would i have to have to have made it right now, and that's the number of xmr you need; 200 minimum for me

>personally I believe every crypto will tank during this recession,
sorry for the stupid question, but I thought we had already entered it? Do you mean that it might seriously tank soon as the recession progresses?

Any specific data you have to predict a 100x from here in 3 years?
Or just best guess?

It's generally hypothesized that XMR is seen as the second most desired cryptocurrency behind Bitcoin due to it's usecase, so we believe that a .1 BTC ratio is realistic. Currently, we are at a .008 ratio. We expect that to improve over time due to the low inflation, use cases, increasing demand for privacy, and tech improvements.
Yeah I mean I don't really like to respond to price analysis questions because it is impossible to predict, especially in the short term. I have no idea. We can see the price drop to 30 tomorrow, or we can see it slowly rise in the near term. I'm more interested in looking 3 years in the future than two weeks.

I believe crypto is mainly used for speculative trading and gambling right now and there will be little demand for it when unemployment is at 20%
a guess, it depends how long this recession lasts

For XMR I see a different trajectory than BTC, but just a guess.
BTC saw darknet adoption and then chain analysis issues arose.
But where BTC never took over was men hedging against divorce, people in borderline countries hedging against collapse etc.
I think XMR has a real chance of taking those markets.

>But where BTC never took over was men hedging against divorce, people in borderline countries hedging against collapse etc.
>I think XMR has a real chance of taking those markets.
You're 100% right on that user. IMO, the "swiss bank" concept is something that over time will become realized as adoption increases.

Attached: moneromilkers.png (940x639, 782.25K)

Darknets hate dealing with monero kek

Why?

Gib more milkers

Yet they still use it... Why? Because XMR is just that good.

I mined a few of these before RandomX and I've been accumulating ever since. Great project, if you don't see XMR sitting at like $400 AT LEAST in then idk what to tell ya

Gonna buy some Monero

Undervalued 4x to 5x.

That is not true. You can say that the majority still uses Bitcoin, but Monero is sharply growing. And it will continue to grow because it is far greater security/privacy than bitcoin.
bitcoininsider.org/article/83179/darknet-markets-flourish-white-house-and-empire-toast-milestone-achievements
3/2/2020
>When news.Bitcoin.com reviewed White House Market (WHM) in January, the site had 6,000 listings. That number has now swelled to 14,000, and there are also 60,000 users of the monero-based darknet market. Notably, the number of WHM listings is now roughly equivalent to Empire. In a signed PGP message celebrating six months of business with nearly 100% uptime, WHM’s admin thanked the community for their business and support. In a thread on the market’s Dread board, users praised its good customer support. “WHM has been my go to market the past month or two. I urge everybody to switch over and learn to pay with XMR,” urged one. “Best market since Dream,” added another.

Attached: moneromilkers4.jpg (1920x1080, 548.09K)

Attached: CQQDzu7_d.jpg (570x663, 42.53K)

Bitcoin is already well established and essentially has a monopoly on the darknet. It's easier to work with when it's what 95% of the users accept there, plus some people simply don't like using xmr whether it be the wallet or the coin itself.
From what I've gathered there's very little interest in actually adopting monero as standard, though it is being used heavily by some as a cleaner for bitcoin. Time will tell, I like monero as an idea but bitcoin is undeniably king.

t. Darknet degenerate

Monero is easy to use, much easier than bitcoin if you want some degree of privacy.

>tech improvements
>can't even sync up a few weeks on a rotating hard drive in less than literal fucking hours

pick one.

>hobbyist project
>winning
Pick one faggot

>uses hdd
Why don't you sync it on your super nintendo?

I thought bitcoin usage decreased due to the police proclaiming they could trace it somehow but it might have been a rumour

You will start noticing more vendors preferring Monero over time. It is inevitable with chainanalysis getting better and better. And at the least, Monero is, as you said, being used to clean Bitcoins. The arguments in favor of Bitcoin being private are non existent.
I agree that Bitcoin is currently king. But Monero is a simple alternative that newbies can quickly use that guarantees total privacy.
Probably the biggest hurdle is liquidity issues. Like if Coinbase were to add Monero you would see an somewhat immediate shift imo.

For a cryptocurrency to advertise itself as 'secure. private. untraceable' they've seemingly got a massive blindspot for the fact that ssd's don't erase even remotely the same as hdd's, or even mostly at all unless you want to spend literal fucking days wiping it.

it's as if they want to force people looking for security into using remote nodes.

Keep your blockchain on the ssd and your wallet on the hdd.
And there is nothing wrong with remote nodes if used over tor.

Folks have to understand the connection of velocity of money and market cap. Currency X can have wider use than currency Y and still have lower market cap because of velocity of money. Understand that bitcoin is worth so much, because it is hardly used and mostly hodled. Monero gets actually used, velocity of money is higher, therefore marketcap is lower. It is still majorly hodled, but not as extremely as bitcoin. The fundamental value of monero based on darknet usage is less than 20 million usd market cap.

Holding is a legitimate use case.

I personaly have a ssd node running 24/7 and remote connect to it if needed.

the only alt coin worth anything

this, long BTC and XMR and short everything else including scam exchanges like binance and their scam token

they do? what's so hard about using monero? lmao you're just making things up

>tor

lel now i know youre fucked

But are you secure, user

oe do you just think you are?

Better than using a public blockchain, visible to everyone in the world till the end of time.
What is wrong with using tor?

OK so use a public blockchain where increased security is completely possible because i can still use hardware that wasn't manufactured this fucking millenium of hope on the bandwagon of fucking otherwise worthless fuckwits and have my shit stolen from me due to shit fucking security.

Also this isn't a fucking either-or you brainlet this is a choice between 5%-95% distribution of the portfolio and a 15%-85% distribution of the portfolio.

Please tell me exactly how you know tor is in any way, both secure and untraceable and not just an alternative way to get fucked, other than people've told you so, along with the developers've told you so and maybe i'll get into some details.

>OK so use a public blockchain where increased security is completely possible because i can still use hardware that wasn't manufactured this fucking millenium
Just use a remote node with your super nintendo, still better security than bitcoin.

all connecting to a remote node will do is show your IP address IF you are connecting to a remote node that is an adversary. No financial info is shown. No data of the transaction. So while not ideal for people who want to be completely secure, it is still a hell of a lot more private than using a blockchain with a public ledger, where somebody can literally go over every transaction you have made, and see where you sent your money and where you received it.
idk what hardware you are using. perhaps download the blockchain and bootstrap?
>use a public blockchain where increased security is completely possible
Bitcoin will never have better security that monero. It would require numerous hard forks that would never happen. Same with Ethereum.

this will likely be of interest to you user: monerooutreach.org/stories/dandelion.html

Except:
1) Must be able to connect to a likely insecure network, through some shit-retarded router for whatever fucking braindead reason
2) Connecting directly to a computer that's running the blockchain I've copied from an SSD instead of copying directly to the computer.

why the fuck would I bother doing this over syncing on an HDD?

>connecting a secure computer to an insecure computer by route of LAN

yeaokbud.jpg

We're talking about security here, you know?

Buddy, why don't you just stick with fiat?

Why are you paranoid about the security of your hardware, but at the same time so careless about the public transactions of bitcoin you use?

I don't think you realize that fiat is much less secure than bitcoin and monero?

Fuck off muppet you got shit all to add here.

We're talking about the securty model of braindeads optimizing SSD-based blockchain models over HDD-based blockchain models, not that you'd know what that means outside of 'monero-good', or 'monero-bad' and i just don't have the time to speak at you like you're four years old.

Privacy and untraceability are not within the scope of the discussion. Go find some play-dough or whatever the fuck it is kids play with these days.

Moneros database LMDB is a very fast one, faster and more stable than bitcoins. The intensive harddisk requirements are due to ring signatures, one of moneros anonymising techniques.
If you want to use outdated hardware, you might, but buddy please stop crying about waiting times then. On todays hardware you need less then 12 h to sync the full blockchain of monero.
It might be that this hardware is flawed, but you have no proof that your dated hardware is not.

Let's say the feds decide they want to track you. They would have a hell of an easier time following you on a public ledger than on Monero. Like, across the board, one can follow every single payment, when you made it, who you sent it to, etc.
With an IP leak -- and by the way, you can connect to one of the reputed nodes like at monero world instead of a local daemon node -- assuming that the node you connect to is an adversary, all that would be given is an IP address at a certain time. It would not show your payment amount, who you sent it to, or even the wallet address of where it came from. So while not completely secure, it is pretty damn safe all things considered.
you're projecting and swearing like a child user. But notwithstanding, ssd is faster. so of course it would be easier to download on an SSD. What do you mean by hdd-based blockchain models?

Just don't understand why ppl are using xmr over Zano. Like you could use zano , who's 100 times better than monero in any situation, but ppl are stuck with an old shit

Wow, 54 posts before a stinky pajeet. That's gotta be a new record. Very bullish tbqh.

Hahahahahahahahaha

>lowest inflation in crypto
that's where you're wrong kiddo
NANO is fully distributed

Fully distributed into developers wallet.

Exactly this
It is a safe haven coin and the project is not interested in mooning but simply having a stable maintaining of value/natural rise in value. It is a hedge crypto, I love gold and silver but those assets are more easily taxed and also more likely to lose you at least a little of your money than monero.
This is personally my favorite project, it genuinely excites me.