Browsing linkedin

>browsing linkedin
>googled "linkedin mckinsey london" and saw the profiles
>saw people who were gifted high level consulting positions where they make grand high level decisions about various industries, taking all the credit and having to implement nothing
>thinking about my current boring office job, where my manager will never give me a good performance review because I don't fit in with stupid normies, and where I have to email and have meetings with 10 people to get anything done

When you get right down to it, the only things that matter for success are looks, social status, fitting in, going to the right schools and universities, and being on 'the track'.

Attached: 6b.jpg (970x1006, 248.72K)

that meme is fucking retarded

yeah it's pretty surprising how successful people in business have technical skills but they aren't really geniuses. i worked in big 4 audit (fuck the big 4 and fuck audit.) the partners were all sharp, but most of them were made partners because they had excellent interpersonal skills (rain makers who could suck client cock and close deals) with a baseline level of technical competency. the partners who were made partners on the basis of technical skill and not interpersonal skill were few and far between, and you could very easily tell who they were because they were classic spergs.

Binged on any fast food today lad?

wow it's almost like the system is broken and you just demonstrated the need for humanities

lmao get fucked.
>the only things that matter for success are looks, social status, fitting in, going to the right schools and universities, and being on 'the track'
And that's a good thing. You saying that tells me that you are a sperg which I would never let have contact with clients. Simple as that.

bump

>STEM
>Staying in his lane
Lmao the dumbest takes on twitter are from comp sci guys

Yeah, sadly this. It's a universal problem.

Everyone hate CS fag in STEM.

>Thinking you need ANY degree to have an opinion about anything on the right.

Straight retarded

>When you get right down to it, the only things that matter for success are looks, social status, fitting in, going to the right schools and universities, and being on 'the track'.

In the corporate world. You don't need to play their game. Figure out what gives you satisfaction and chase after it.

Attached: WesternIkigaiDefinition.jpg (750x666, 30.88K)

>He thinks it's just humanityfags that have this problem

Attached: atheists4.png (711x1200, 79.38K)

tech bros are the issue, theoretical comp sci twitter is more similar to math twitter

physicists have this reputation as well

Attached: 20120321.gif (576x2992, 288.6K)

This meme is ridiculous. Any decent liberal arts education will have you reading and writing in 3+ languages, on literally anything. CS fags just don't understand the sheer volume of text that a humanities student can get through.

>implying modern scientists don’t chime in on politics, society, philosophy, etc. Like they’re experts
Kek you haven’t been paying much attention have you. All the Chem profs at my uni were idealistic socialist idiots (in that regard, very clever when it came to Chem and physics of course)

Did you go to school 40 years ago? Or are you just memeing again.

One has math to back up his claims and the other has a magical fairy book

Im confused, can the humanities fix the system?
BECAUSE IT'S HAD OVER 100 YEARS TO FIX THE SYSTEM AND THE ONLY THING ITS MANAGED TO PUMP OUT IT'S ASS IS THIRD WAVE FEMINISM

>Sciencefags: HAHAH GOD DOESN'T EXIST NO EVIDENCE NO EVIDENCE NO EVIDENCE
>Sciencefags: uhh string theory and multiple universes evidence? u-uh well we have this elegant math! we don't need evidence!

that moon cricket must be one dumb son of a darkie if it took him 10 years to figure out models for solid state physics

But the math is the evidence.
The only way to convince someone is for them to learn the math themselves and unfortunately its not easy.

>math is evidence

Attached: 1416448113530.png (490x394, 161.42K)

>Only the chosen ones can read the magic text

More religious than the average christian lmao.

If there's so much math proving how the world began than please, share it with us.
Fact is, it takes even more faith to believe in shit like the big bang or macroevolution than it does to believe in some god, because at least the latter admit that it's beyond their understanding. This is coming from an agnostic by the way.

Attached: 1580587287001.jpg (900x600, 109.96K)

*then

Attached: Screen Shot 2020-02-24 at 6.39.22 PM.png (346x524, 65.06K)

you'd be surprised to learn that we're still not sure (and *can't* be sure) if the axiom system accepted by most mathematiciand is consistent.
you'd also be surprised to learn that mathematicians who care about foundations still occasionally argue about whether this axiom system accurately reflects reality.

Don't bother trying to explain that to sciencucks

Attached: ilovescience.png (518x600, 18.82K)

I love when nonSTEM dweebs bring up Godels Incompleteness Theorems as proof that science is wrong. Science only seeks to explain observations, math isn't proof of anything like the idiot above asserted, consistent replicable observation of a models predictions is.

literally every comfort you have today is due to the humanities
who do you think got you the vote or the presumption of innocence or the right to free speech? electricians?

>who do you think got you the vote
Politicians who were trying to gain an advantage by increasing the number of people to vote and appealing to the lowest common denominator
> the presumption of innocence
Consequence of Old Money who wanted to make it harder on the state to convict them for their degeneracy both monetarily and of the flesh
>free speech
Literally memed into existence by fringe press, the kind that the humanities hates today

Also don't shit on electricians, when something goes wrong in my life, I'm far more likely to call an electrician then someone who has a BA in Gender Studies to fix my problem

This meme is not true

t. humanities student

If you're not stem, why even bother.

You arent wrong. Geology is chad af and all the hotties that love outdoors with lo social skills. Cs majors get bullied haha

>Science only seeks to explain observations, math isn't proof of anything like the idiot above asserted, consistent replicable observation of a models predictions is.

But the peeps being mocked in these jokes revere science without question and not hold everything to scrutiny. Essentially treating it as a religion which is an awful mindset to have if you were to go into the profession as you'd treat authorities akin to the word of God.

I should have done Geology in retrospect. Took a ton of Geology classes as an undergrad, and the professor actually was a chad. Former football player, fun lectures, easy tests. Everybody loved him.

i wrote a response, went to do something else and then closed the tab like a retard. anyways, here we go again.

i don't claim that "science is wrong", just that math by itself isn't all that uncontended and settled as it might seem. consistency does not matter that much in practice, but most mathematicians and scientists would still prefer to work in a consistent system. we're also seriously bad at spotting inconsistencies (take e.g. the agda theorem prover and filter the old github issues for proofs of false). granted, zfc is arguably the most checked axiom system that there is, and hence we typically prove consistency relative to zfc.
that being said, zfc by itself is not enough to support the kinds of mathematics that is done by e.g. categorical string theorists these days. you at least need additional inaccessible cardinals (which are arguably not as controversial as choice, though).
then again, nobody cares much about foundations - mathematical proof checking is a social process and thus prone to error, with people like grothendieck even taking giant liberties like "equality is isomorphism". and that's just mathematicians, physicist and computer scientists work way more sloppily than mathematicians.
even then, we're still arguing about the validity of our foundations. both choice and lack of choice lead to unintuitive mathematical results. some might even argue that LEM is too far fetched, given that it destroys the computational content of proofs.
even beyond that, you might argue about the validity of definitions. scientists and mathematicians often do not even bother to prove that some definition has a model, so you don't even necessarily have that connection back to the axioms.

arguing that science only seeks to explain observations is a tad bit reductionist, quite a few physicists have abandoned that perspective decades ago. they still get excited when their axiomatic musings are verified in practice, but it's not a necessity.

Not only that but the body odor from those gucking slimy cs majors who all have pajeet friends. Stop stinking up the elevators that's why we take the stairs
Theoretics are legit faggots no different than philosophy majors. After calc 1 it's useless and nobody fucking likes math majors, another group that gets bullied along with Cs and physics majors haha

read a book nigger
widespread societal change doesnt happen because people on top say so, it's a slow, gradual change of the culture. and that is driven by the liberal arts.

you seem like a right-wing retard, surely you must see that stuff like gay acceptance is driven by the media, i.e. the arts

>t. 115 IQ midwit toiling in the belly of the beast with nary an epistemological care in the world

Attached: johncleeseheadshake.gif (226x226, 386.55K)

> a wizard did it. I ain't got to explain shit.

>After calc 1 it's useless
cope

Can confirm. I am a phisicist and I am unironically convinced that I know everything.

Always a time to change. Lil secret we wont tell you is that geology I'd hard and you have to not be a fucking loser to pass field 1 and 2 but you get to drink, smoke and fuck your way into anything and if you can chad it up you'll get a job even with just an undergrad.
Pro tip bring condoms on field 2. Your bound to fuck someone

We deal in direct observation transitioned into interpretation.

Keep trying to pull tricks out your hat ass faggot, our department openly mocks math and physics, that's why yall dont get shit for funding kek

Friendly reminder that the only "chad" stem major is geology. Fat fucks and weak fucks cant cut it and get dropped. Hotties who love camping need only to apply

But we are only limited to the environment and time we exist within. Physics after electromagnetics gets into almost pure theory defeating the purpose of observation. Maybe if you clowns focused on the here and now you all will finally have an answer to what dark matter is and how it affects our environment

Phew. This thread was starting to make me feel stupid, but you reverted it to chan baseline.

Some engineers are alright. The eng tech guys are decent too, they know how to actually make things.

That is nothing compared to who I am , because I suggest you to imagine ....?
We all are human beings anything else is limitless optional, delusional

Why would anyone need to project nerd shit about science.
I mean do you really want me to lecture you on the geomorphology of cindercone degregadtion, the project I'm currently working on?
No this is biz, on Yas Forums, relax faggot

Nobody, because I don't care, and neither does anyone else.

>A wizard did it

Good explanation of the big bang.

kek this guy is good

>csfags
you mean humanitiesfags who learned to code

Yea no

lmao just be yourself loser

Yeah but everything after it follows logically. Whereas god has no logic, he pretty much does whatever he wants. Signal to noise ratio is zero. Useless data point. Doesn't explain shit.