Ever since i've started watching his videos, he seems like a textbook Australian shitposter and turbo autist and actually starting to win me over. I always assumed the BSV shills were stupid, but from watching his speeches for some reason I'm starting to think its him. He seems to know bitcoin inside and out.
This video of him rambling and screaming at the host and opponent, and walking around the stage away from his lecturn makes him look like a coked up genius who may have actually invented it.
>This video of him rambling and screaming at the host and opponent, and walking around the stage away from his lecturn makes him look like a coked up genius who may have actually invented it. satoshi was not a crazy ass drama queen tho
thats from 2014 though i dont know what to believe
nice trips. he used australian/britishism's like 'bloody' in his forum posts which make it seem like he is non american
fuck someone tell me the answer
Jace Nguyen
Why do you think we're convinced he is? He understands Bitcoin better than anyone. Everything else is questionable.
Blake Wright
thats what i dont understand. he seems to understand it very well but just do crazy shit .
is there any reason he wouldnt sign the blocks?
Ryder Taylor
bro's please pull me out of the hole i think im starting to believe its creg and i dont know how to feel
Jose Harris
Looks like the rent boy me an my niggaz ran a train on weeks back props to him tho he wanted more
Landon Adams
fuck off paid shills i have a lot of bsv but you saps are shit at creating organic conversation.
Colton Martin
being non american and a gay ass drama queen is not the same thing. there are 8.6 billion non americans on this planet 80% of which are not gay ass drama queens 3 billion of them has access to computers no idea why would anyone like this faggot for satoy.
Kevin Bell
this craig shows zero signs of actual deep understanding of technical issues involved
Aiden Ross
dude i dont have any btv or bsv, but im an australian and started reading into creg because he is australian too. then i started watching him debate people and seeing how outlandish he is, but how he seems to know what he is talking about (i wouldnt know if he is lying or not) is sort of convincing
Jayden Ward
>He seems to know bitcoin inside and out. yep that's why he didn't know what base58 was and couldn't stop talking about negative gamma (mathematically impossible)
Jackson Gonzalez
Tachyon Security Protocol uses asymmetric end-to-end encryption scheme and protocol simulation to prevent network sniffing.
Jaxon Ward
i wouldnt have a clue whats wrong or whats right, he just sounded well read to me and other people have told me he knows what he is talking about. could you explain the base58 and negative gamma stuff to me?
Oliver Gutierrez
he is bullshitting user if you were a dev you would see right through it. unless you choose not to because it fits your preexisting bias. what craig does is called technobabble sounds technical but its all a bunch of handwaveium and buzzwords that don't mean a thing mixed with baseless assumptions and lies.
Ethan Cook
watching this makes me want to buy bsv
Sebastian Davis
poltards like craig because he is a bootlicker and likes to bash communism. but just because someone bashes commies doesn't mean he is right on anything else. that would be a fallacy to assume such things.
Hudson Ramirez
right. its bizzare to think someone would spend the whole life larping as satoshi if they are not actually him. i find it easier to imagine he is just 4d chessing everyone rather than just acting a fool on stage year on year. id kill to know what his endgame is.
Asher Gonzalez
probably that is why they made it user. everything they do and say is to make you fomo in and feel like an early adopter even as price drops from $450 to $100
Grayson Turner
are those videos made for craig wright? is that what you mean by 'that is why they made it'?
wtf my mind is being blown right now.
Ryder Rogers
my opinion on this is following simple logic of elimination makes craig signing if he can maximize his gains while minimizing his liability compared to what he is doing "proving himself in court" which maximizes his liability and minimizes his gains.
Kevin Bell
>He understands Bitcoin better than anyone CSW in fact doesn't understand any of the true technical details of how bitcoin works. Even rather basic things like how transactions are formed he routinely gets wrong. When its pointed out to him, he then goes on long rambling voodoo filled rambles about how he was 'misunderstood' Anyone who thinks he understands bitcoin outs themselves as a pleb, like you just did.
I don't think he is, I know he is because I performed writing syntax analysis on satoshis posts and Craigs rants and they share certain markers. I have 15bsv just in case.
Rightttttt, you've set me straight I think. I'll do some more research but I think it was those sets of videos I was watching originally.
Can I ask out of curiosity what crypto's you hold?
Samuel Johnson
satoshi invented base58 to make sure people wouldn't send bitcoin to the wrong address thinking you read an O instead of a 0
Justin Morales
>Gavin Andresen This fucker raped Bitcoin functionality and didn't solve problems that are coming back to bite users in the ass, ten years later. Of course he's going to say that Creg is Nakamoto if that gives value to the shitty work he did.
One of the reasons I don't believe Creg is satoshi is that Satoshi left the stage in a dignified manner. Creg pushed himself back into the spotlight as the retarded aussie he is.
>be needy australian ego maniac >sign every email with 15 titles >see bitcoin in 2012.... >fuggthatshouldabeenme.jpg >start buying on mtgox >try and fail to become part of community >start writing "bitcoin belle" via twitter dms >tell bitcoin belle you love her and you invented btc to impress her >needy roastie then starts pumping your story to others >bitcoin belle gets you invites to conferences >...you know the rest
now ask yourself a very very simple question. why did "satoshi" who was in direct comms with all the lead devs and thought leaders need bitcoin belle to "introduce" him to gavin, john, roger, mike h, etc? why didn't he just out himself to them as part of the normal email conversations they were having?
his bullshit scammer story only works on newfags who arrived at btc in last few years and don't see how preposterous the whole narrative is...
imagine listening to that creep vitalik and his brainlet interpretation of signals theory as if there isn't a conceivable reason to not sign publicly youtu.be/dC0wwFJ7cHM I don't agree with craigs rational behind not publicliy signing (in that the law doesn't need him to protect it from setting a ridiculous precedent of having a signature be proof of who you are) but I don't care that he hasn't and don't think he needs to.
There is more evidence craig wright is satoshi nakamoto than anyone else on earth. BSV is defined by this document bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf and btc is not
Why would anyone unironically believe his lies when they could believe it for two rupees a post instead?
Isaac Murphy
>craig was blackmailed
>Intelligent enough to keep himself from being discovered by intelligence agencies but not enough to be blackmailed by the brother of a dead nobody.
>I won't sign keys because that would prove I'm the owner of the key. But I'm satoshi, My word is enough for it.
>I got bank statements and credit statements... Satoshi hated banks.
Creg has had opportunity after oportunity to prove he is satoshi, even in a court of law which would bring him billions of dollars and the adulations of pretty much all humanity. Yet he choses to not do it, while at the same time screaming that we should believe him to be satoshi. Retarded
Blake Reyes
This is how all Australians talk. Yeah he's Satoj.
Nathan Russell
>imagine believing segwit transactions have no signatures fucking svtards i swear... just because tx is structured differently nothing has changed. only nodes that don't see signatures are then ones that did not upgrade in 2017.
Christian Rivera
>satoshi hated banks zero evidenc of this
>Creg has had opportunity after oportunity to prove he is satoshi define how someone proves they are satoshi
> nothing has changed the payee does not receive a signature from the previous owner. It is not a chain of digital signatures. ib4 witness the witness is a hash of a signature which is not a signature
are you driven to embarrass yourself publicly? heres the truth: you are a gullible and a scammer is taking your money. people try to point this out but you fight against them. it will all dawn on you eventually but the pain will be too much to handle and you will kill yourself.
Matthew Wright
Oh yeah. You convinced me that Creg is satoshi with absolutely zero factual evidence. Thanks
Jeremiah Morgan
>the payee does not receive a signature from the previous owner bullshit >It is not a chain of digital signatures never was tho i can give you countless examples of bitcoin with no chain of signatures. bitcoin is an utxo that's all. it's spent to a script executing to true since the first release. it's yours if you can spend it. if it requires a signature to spend then you have to provide that signature. nothing has changed whatsoever. you guys are absolute brainlets. >the witness is a hash of a signature which is not a signature no the witness is literally a sigscript including a signature with a standard segwit tx. it's the old sigscript field that doesn't contain a signature.
David Gomez
>zero arguments
if craig isn't satoshi I don't give a shit. my investment in bsv is not based on that
how would someone prove to you they are satoshi?
Daniel Peterson
>how would someone prove to you they are satoshi? eas as pie step 1 -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
mQGiBEkJ+qcRBADKDTcZlYDRtP1Q7/ShuzBJzUh9hoVVowogf2W07U6G9BqKW24r piOxYmErjMFfvNtozNk+33cd/sq3gi05O1IMmZzg2rbF4ne5t3iplXnNuzNh+j+6 VxxA16GPhBRprvnng8r9GYALLUpo9Xk17KE429YYKFgVvtTPtEGUlpO1EwCg7FmW dBbRp4mn5GfxQNT1hzp9WgkD/3pZ0cB5m4enzfylOHXmRfJKBMF02ZDnsY1GqeHv /LjkhCusTp2qz4thLycYOFKGmAddpVnMsE/TYZLgpsxjrJsrEPNSdoXk3IgEStow mXjTfr9xNOrB20Qk0ZOO1mipOWMgse4PmIu02X24OapWtyhdHsX3oBLcwDdke8aE gAh8A/sHlK7fL1Bi8rFzx6hb+2yIlD/fazMBVZUe0r2uo7ldqEz5+GeEiBFignd5 HHhqjJw8rUJkfeZBoTKYlDKo7XDrTRxfyzNuZZPxBLTj+keY8WgYhQ5MWsSC2MX7 FZHaJddYa0pzUmFZmQh0ydulVUQnLKzRSunsjGOnmxiWBZwb6bQjU2F0b3NoaSBO YWthbW90byA8c2F0b3NoaW5AZ214LmNvbT6IYAQTEQIAIAUCSQn6pwIbAwYLCQgH AwIEFQIIAwQWAgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEBjAnoZeyUihXGMAnjiWJ0fvmSgSM3o6Tu3q RME9GN7QAKCGrFw9SUD0e9/YDcqhX1aPMrYue7kCDQRJCfqnEAgA9OTCjLa6Sj7t dZcQxNufsDSCSB+yznIGzFGXXpJk7GgKmX3H9Zl4E6zJTQGXL2GAV4klkSfNtvgs SGJKqCnebuZVwutyq1vXRNVFPQFvLVVo2jJCBHWjb03fmXmavIUtRCHoc8xgVJMQ LrwvS943GgsqSbdoKZWdTnfnEq+UaGo+Qfv66NpT3Yl0CXUiNBITZOJcJdjHDTBO XRqomX2WSguv+btYdhQGGQiaEx73XMftXNCxbOpqwsODQns7xTcl2ENru9BNIQME I7L9FYBQUiKHm1k6RrBy1as8XElS2jEos7GAmlfF1wShFUX+NF1VOPdbN3ZdFoWq sUjKk+QbrwADBQgA9DiD4+uuRhwk2B1TmtrXnwwhcdkE7ZbLHjxBfCsLPAZiPh8c ICfV3S418i4H1YCz2ItcnC8KAPoS6mipyS28AU1B7zJYPODBn8E7aPSPzHJfudMK MqiCHljVJrE23xsKTC0sIhhSKcr2G+6ARoG5lwuoqJqEyDrblVQQFpVxBNPHSTqu O5PoLXQc7PKgC5SyQuZbEALEkItl2SL2yBRRGOlVJLnvZ6eaovkAlgsbGdlieOr0 UwWuJCwzZuBDruMYAfyQBvYfXZun3Zm84rW7Jclp18mXITwGCVHg/P5n7QMbBfZQ A25ymkuj636Nqh+c4zRnSINfyrDcID7AcqEb6IhJBBgRAgAJBQJJCfqnAhsMAAoJ EBjAnoZeyUihPrcAniVWl5M44RuGctJe+IMNX4eVkC08AJ9v7cXsp5uDdQNo8q3R 8RHwN4Gk8w== =3FTe -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- step 2 sign properly with a known satoshi address and publish this signature with an intelligible and provably not reused message. something that references the time it was made and the intent. step 3 provide backstory (optional)
Jordan Myers
He’s a spastick and is going to prizon. Risk. Finance.
Noah Rodriguez
>bullshit nope.
>never was pic related is wrong >nothing has changed why would you do it then? >sigscript the payee does not receive a signature
it also means you have to trust miners to only accept transactions that have the correct signature because segwit nodes don't need the signature to consider the transaction valid
so if an 11 year old signed you would believe they are satoshi?
Camden Bennett
>how would someone prove to you they are satoshi? Release a fucking signature to the public. Let every cryptographer in the world check if the proof is valid. It's that fucking simple. Don't want to release it to the public? Invite all major cryptpographers and crypto creators to witness the proof. He could prove it and also get into every single dev team in the world.
>He can't because he was blackmailed and he doesn't wanna do it, and this is a cryptographic imposibilitye and...
Excuses
Charles Davis
This
Evan Perez
>zero arguments and then your bait question >how would someone prove to you they are satoshi?
face the facts. there is no proof that could be offered to you at this stage of your belief which could convince you. you realize this with your bait question.
this goes deeper than facts at this point. we could have a video of csw saying "I'm not satoshi i am scamming people out of their money because im sociopath with personality issues" and you would say "good ole satoshi throwing the haters off the trail"
the only point you will see the truth is in the moments before you commit suicide. you are locked into this now.
I'm pointing out how you retards think a public signature is sufficient evidence when it's not, it obviously is evidence but if a 6 year old signs the key are they satoshi? no
it is bollocks sorry, you have no clue what you are talking about. >the payee does not receive a signature only if he runs a very old client (his choice). otherwise this is utter bullshit.
>why would you do it then? makes absolute sense. it saves block space separates the burden of booking the financial transaction from the data only required for validation of the transaction which is not needed after n confirmation because the ledger is immutable at that point thanks to the nakamoto consensus. also fixed tx malleability makes it easier and simple to build upon. also makes it possible to have very large and complex sigscipts that are only partially published (taproot)
>so if an 11 year old signed you would believe they are satoshi? in that weird scenario i would believe he has satoshis keys access to his bitcoins and this makes it 99.999% likely he knows satoshi personally maybe it's his dad. in case it's an older person who is tech literate or an accomplished dev i would assume he is satoshi especially if he says so until someone else signs or any contradicting information surfaces.
Hunter Cruz
yeah that picture is not accurate. its not how bitcoin works or ever worked. it's dumbed down and simplified for that 7 page essay which is not bitcon.
John Richardson
>the court case Creg lost the case. Also falsified documents Yep. He's Satoshi
Easton Edwards
>ive constructed a bizarre obtuse argument that exist in my fantasy world, which you must admit is absurd therefore this means creg is satoshi.
Jose Taylor
They are trying really hard to convince people so they can control the uncontrollable.
>>why would you do it then? was obviously pointing out the contradiction between it changed nothing and it's an improvement. malleability is a feature not a bug Just increase the blocksize instead of breaking the fundamental definition as a chain of digital signatures
the 11 year old is just proof your digital signature = satoshi nakamoto is dependent on the other evidence as all of human history has been.
>btc is not accurately described by the whitepaper I know
I don't care if you want to make 144mb/day digital gold but that is not Bitcoin a peer to peer electronic cash system a chain of digital signatures with nodes that solve hash puzzles and users do not need to run a node to verify transactions and pic related
