Let's play a housing game Yas Forums

Since all the landlords here say you should just buy bro, let us see how practical it is for you.

Rule: Before doing the below, the house must be within a 30 minute drive to your workplace. No cheating by commuting more than an hour a day.


Step 1: Post your income.
Step 2: Times that by a maximum of 2.5 to come up with what you can afford for a 30 year mortgage.
Step 3: Post pictures in your local area of what you can afford.

Step 1: $52,000/yr
Step 2: Can afford $130,000.
Step 3, pic related. It's just a shitty mobile home manufactured in 1969.

Attached: whatcanafford.png (800x748, 761.86K)

Other urls found in this thread:

zillow.com/homedetails/121-E-Pierce-Ave-Orlando-FL-32809/46190352_zpid/
investopedia.com/articles/pf/05/030905.asp
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Maybe you could move away from California.

just live on the street

Play the game or shut up.

Make me.

Attached: richer.jpg (334x2000, 78.39K)

>ALL AGE PARK
Looks like half of Yas Forums can't live there due to their parole conditions

Kek

Come on, you have plenty of options. Are there no prisons? And the Union workhouses, are they still in operation?

Inmates unironically got a better deal than I do here, I would need to make at least $82,000 to be better off than them.

Then these people should just go to prison. And if they would rather die, they had better do it, and decrease the surplus population.

Attached: he rich.jpg (100x9999, 94.77K)

60k/yr

Attached: Capture.png (1237x851, 1.38M)

Not too bad relative to your location, year built?

zillow.com/homedetails/121-E-Pierce-Ave-Orlando-FL-32809/46190352_zpid/
1935
Old house but it looks pretty nice for the price.

1935, also it's close to the ghetto

This is why people who rent are retarded and destined to stay renting. You never, ever buy a house in full you always leverage your money. Why? Because I can earn a higher rate of return investing the money elsewhere (so long as I can outpace the rate of my note). A standard conventional mortgage will be 80% LTV meaning you only put 20% down. If you’re a first time home buyer you can apply for an FHA loan which allows you to only have to put 5% down. By your calculations and utilizing a standard conventional loan, with $130k you could afford a $650k house at 80% LTV. Your mortgage on a 30 year fixed 425 point loan would be roughly $2500/month. Renters were destined to rent.

Damn bro, it tripled in value in 3 years.

Attached: soldfor44k.png (637x371, 26.11K)

where did op say anything about paying cash for a house?

6, sorry*.

>2500/month on a $52,000 salary.
>90% of take home salary.
>Affordable.

This is why landlords are screaming recently because they have massively overextended themselves. If you go a month or a few months without rent you'll be destroyed.

I specifically said “using your calculation”. His 2.5 year calculation is retarded, no prudent RE investor valuate property or the value of their note utilizing that metric, hence why I said “using your calculation”. The point of my post was to highlight how retarded the original post is and why it’s indicative of renters staying as renters. I’m guessing you rent as well?

You could get a roommate and pay half.

After tax income I am assuming?

1. 55k before, 40k after
2. 120k
3. jesus christ its worse than i thought

Attached: we will not mourn boomers.jpg (1414x580, 69.45K)

58k/yr

Attached: Screenshot_20200326-155125_Zillow.jpg (1080x2220, 1.07M)

Yeah, 4-6x local median income in your area is a good range for housing to correct to. It's not a terrible idea for a thread though, just have fun with it my dood.

At least two people have OD'd and one person been murdered in that house

Maybe that's why it's so cheap

Attached: 1585092901849.jpg (4608x3456, 3.23M)

The fuck are you even talking about retard? The conventional advice to see what you can afford is no more than 2.5x your yearly income on a 40 year mortgage, which is what the OP used, which is what he did.

Posted income: $52,000/yr.
Can afford a house: $130,000/yr.
2.5x $52,000/yr=$130,000.

30 year*.

investopedia.com/articles/pf/05/030905.asp

For 30 years sounds great.

2.5 years for the down payment not the full purchase price. He is posting full purchase prices that are under the 2.5 amount, the conventional rule of thumb your talking about is for the down payment

That's a bit over what you can afford according to conventional wisdom, you would be able to afford 150k.

But it’s not 2.5, I was taught 1.75 in undergrad and then grad school told me to forget about that useless shit and just do a DCF analysis

When link moons I'll be able to raise my kids in a decent neighborhood

Attached: Screenshot_20200326-155858_Zillow.jpg (1080x2220, 1.37M)

No, it's not 2.5x for the downpayment, it's for what you can afford.

Determining an Affordable Mortgage
Generally speaking, most prospective homeowners can afford to finance a property that costs between two and two and a half times their gross income. Under this formula, a person earning $100,000 per year can afford a mortgage of $200,000 to $250,000. However, this calculation is only a general guideline. You can use Investopedia's mortgage calculator to better estimate monthly mortgage payments.

Based, let me be the third

>1337
absolutely based digits

Could afford more, but this would be fine.
95k/year

Attached: 2020-03-26-160145_1230x767_scrot.png (1230x767, 1001.34K)

if I've got money already saved up for a downpayment, is this 2.5x rule of thumb only for the borrowed amount (not including the downpayment)?

I just bought a 300k house in September. I make 48k per year (before taxes).

Nice, how're you about to afford it

Attached: 1584163366200.png (1022x1024, 1.8M)

I don't want to play the game. I'm insecure about what I make

By saving my money instead of wasting it on stupid shit

How long did you save for? What was your strategy? How big was your downpayment?

Excluding the downpayment.

This is literal brainlet investing, I’m sorry I wasn’t aware of this investopedia calculation. I’ll ask my grad professors for a refund

Can you explain to me in simpler terms how someone making $52,000 a year can take out the $630,000 you suggested they could and not get destroyed in a mortgage? What do you suggest?

Suggest as the max mortgage someone making $52k/yr can take out without having to rely on renters, to clarify.

Imagine living in cuckifornia lmao.

Attached: Screen Shot 2020-03-26 at 6.18.42 PM.png (2266x1504, 2.81M)

I wasn’t suggesting that, I was simply plugging in values to the existing formula the OP provided. I would never suggest someone making $53k leverage a $650k house...

I started working when I was 21 and I'm about to turn 29. I was even at Walmart for 2.5 years making a meager 20k/22k (again, before taxes). My strategy was to not spend money. The down payment was 90k. I've also put about 55k into various long-term investments and retirement accounts. I also bought a 22k car at the start of 2019. I'm obviously in debt at this point due to the mortgage, but it's for only 15 years. Once that's done, I can probably retire if I wish.

It's pretty crazy to me how people don't have money.

Right...but mortgages aren’t cookie cutter like the formula suggest. Even a variable rate vs conventional will dictate different equity contributions over the long run. This is why time value of money is so important and why the investopedia formula is made for retards

>Times that by a maximum of 2.5 to come up with what you can afford for a 30 year mortgage.
with interest rates as low as they are, I can technically afford a 600k home on an 80k salary.

He can't, most degrees aren't worth the paper they're written on (Especially U Cal/Ivy League).

No reason to go to university unless you want to become an Accountant, Medical Doctor or Engineer (As you're required).

Met a dude who did a PhD on Leaves; His thesis was a 25 page laminated (Homemade) book with leaves he collect from the side of the road.

What were your living expenses and location to be able to save almost half to a third of your salary(after I'm assuming putting money into a retirement fund?) for so long?

Obviously, this is just a general rule of thumb. What would you suggest for someone making 53k with a fixed rate 30 year mortgage could afford?

I was with my mom until early 2017 and then I lived with a coworker from then until buying the house. He charged 600 a month.

$53k after or before taxes? What’s your monthly take home?

46,000 per year
x 2. 5 = 115,000
This house built in 1935. Grim.

Attached: 20200326_194122.jpg (1080x2006, 818.19K)

Before.

Take home is around 34k after retirement deductions and healthcare.

Jesus Christ, they couldn't even fix the screen before putting it on Zillow.

Based Scrooge

How much do you make a year now?

That would be contingent upon any other liabilities you have. Student loans? Car payment? If I’m making $53k a year I am likely waiting until I can afford mortgage under more strenuous conditions, say 70% LTV and at 500 points. Each investor has different risk profiles and investment objectives

160-200

200 would be stretching yourself and you’d probably have to stop 401k contributions for a few years. The first couple years of home ownership are the hardest.