Cases jump from 20k to 43k in 3 days

>cases jump from 20k to 43k in 3 days
>alright let's open businesses and end the quarantine

Attached: trump.jpg (750x872, 89.5K)

>orange man bad

He's more worried about the economy than the citizens safety.

I've made prepper posts on Yas Forums before and gotten laughed at.

The economy collapsing would do more damage to citizens than the Chinese virus could ever dream of.

Fucking retards...

They didn't jump; they're actually testing now so confirmations are going up.

Social media was a mistake.

The economy IS safety. Do you want 10% of 70+ year olds to die or do you want violence and strife across the entire population which results in deaths and injury 10x that.

Do you really want to cripple the economy because some 500 useless boomers died?

Attached: 75ED54D7-47FF-4D80-BD2A-F438F7910B08.jpg (1024x590, 95.12K)

That's how all leaders should be. The weak will die off no matter what you do. Better to think big, and nobody thinks as big as Trump

>He's more worried about the economy than the citizens safety.
Based

>The virus magically stopped spreading & we're just catching up

Attached: 1585006491012.jpg (699x900, 92.61K)

>orange man good

It's definitely spreading, like a cold (weird right?), but the significant jumps you're seeing on the graphs aren't indicative of more deaths (as evidenced by the fucking graphs). They're just detecting the virus in increasing numbers of asymptomatic/ nothing burger symptom people. The highest risk, and clearly infected people, were being tested all along, so those numbers aren't seeing parabolic growth.

Why do i feel like I'm having this same very very basic argument with the same paid provocateur in every thread..?

>He'll reply with a laughing face because facts are facts, and he's done here.

>Why do i feel like I'm having this same very very basic argument with the same paid provocateur in every thread..?

Schizophrenia?

Yes.

Deaths actually decrease during recessions and depressions. Look it up

Thanks, anti-vaxxer. Now please, go outside and play with your infected friends

Most likely, yes.

I'm going outside to get coughed on. See you bros later.

Uhh deaths are rising exponentially user

>It's definitely spreading, like a cold (weird right?), but the significant jumps you're seeing on the graphs aren't indicative of more deaths (as evidenced by the fucking graphs).
Meanwhile death rate is higher the infection rate

wrong
mortality rates drop during recessions as people tend to be more conservative and avoid expensive and dangerous activities

Yup. And killing half a million Americans will do both.

Caring more about the economy than a handful of boomers is a good thing!

Attached: C7FB9137-9C97-4953-B3E3-BBFEEACEAB2F.jpg (500x669, 143.1K)

Trump happens to be in the group that would die off. Actually the majority of our leaders would and should die by your logic. Or does it only apply to the people below?

>vaxEd and infected
>unvaxed but not infected

Kill yourself glownigger kike think tank shill

>pensioners contribute to the economy

Nice mental gymnastics, nevertrumper.

Don't necessarily disagree - unemployment rises lead to thousands of deaths too though

It's a hoax, you stupid moron. Flu like any other during every years flu season.
Fake media crisis.

China and Italy were both horrible case studies. The virus was new in China with unknown lethality so they clamped down hard on it in case it was potentially a world ending superbug. This generally scared the fuck out of every other country paying attention.

Italy was running flights directly to and from Wuhan before this whole time because they have tons of Chinese workers in their textile industry. The virus obviously had been spreading like wildfire for months there. I wouldn't be surprised if Italy was already on the back end of the curve by the time they started mass testing and posting big scary positive numbers.

Hurr durr stop the entire economy because it's flu season, what could go wrong?
Your mind on mass media.

On the contrary, the deaths from this disease would result in a net benefit to the economy. Those past the age of 60 are no longer an asset but a liability in absolute terms.

Wrong, people can't afford Healthcare, some people can't afford life saving drugs. Others go homeless and end up becoming criminals which has a very high mortality rate. Others end up abusing drugs and alcohol. Recession will be much worse on deaths then the Corona virus.

>wE dOnT nEeD aN eCoNoMy

>why would I need to breathe when my stonks are up???!!!?

the survival of the state is paramount. Unless you want to live without society's niceties.

Yes, orange man bad.

Just fucking look it up retard, your conjecture means nothing

your granny that gave you milk and cookies as a child is going to die from the chink flu so that the rest of us can wage in peace for our corporate overlords. her sacrifice will not have been in vain. god bless america.

This society can't even provide essential healthcare, let it burn and be reborn.

What basement level risk management. Novel viruses can mutate and present unknown risks to the system. What a downturn gonna do, offer to raise a bunch of gaussian risks like suicide?

>The economy = stonks

The economy is everything. It's your livelihood. It's the revenue of the state. That means it's your police force, your firefighters, your military, your welfare programs. It's what keeps food stocked on shelves, kids in school, and cars running. Without that you literally have nothing you triple niggerbrain. Yes I'm willing to let an IMMINENT VIRUS go ahead and run its course rather than shutting the economy down 2 to 3 times before we realize that is the only way to combat it.

Attached: 1351492304999.jpg (256x256, 10.85K)

You look it up. There is literally a stay that says just a 1 percent increase in unemployment increases your chance of dying by 6 percent. This recession will have much bigger impacts than just unemployment. Stop being retarded and think for a minute.

Ahhh yes another seething liberal who chooses feelings over fact. Have you looked at the specifics of the deaths or do you just see a CNN headline and go “omg 30 people died today!” Almost all of these deaths are occurring in assisted living facilities or retirement homes, Arizona just had a case where 20+ assisted living residents died in one facility. Try to look more into the circumstances surrounding the deaths as opposed to a raw number, you might not sound like such a retard next time

Why is the state so fragile it can't stop for a month or two and has to elect to sacrifice a significant portion of its population everytime something like this occurs? And since when has 'the state' been paramount? I don't remember the US being founded with that kind of philosophy.

>Europe is a hoax

>the survival of the state is paramount.
"Land of the Free"
AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH

Fucking retard

Attached: 6F3745B3-D628-41EA-A817-A53858396BF5.jpg (1125x1759, 451.7K)

The US loses 30,000 people annually to flu
The world loses 500,000
We currently have 600 US deaths from corona
And 17,000 globally

China had peak incidence and recovery within three months
New cases and deaths in Italy are already declining

If we don't start seeing at least 50x the daily incident disease rate and death rate we're currently seeing it's not even as important an illness as the flu

The normal, seasonal, non-pandemic flu
That nobody even thinks about

Take this shit to pol or reddit.

Don’t be putting your TDS on full display on Yas Forums you faggots

2018 - 1500 ppl dying per week
2020 - 500 ppl dying per week

LETS ALL LOCK OURSELF INDOORS AND WATCH NETFLIX ON LOW REZ MODE!
DO IT FOR ELLEN!!!!!!

Attached: NCHSData11-2018-2020.png (892x261, 32.83K)

Now post the study about unemployment, poverty, etc increase death rate.

Kek has this already turned into a copypasta or are you the same schizo op from that other thread

The proper response was to shut down travel back in early Feburary but since that hasn't happened the proper response has been to isolate and force kill it. People kept dragging their feet until we face a 'tradeoff' bullshit situation caused by the same fucks who value the economy over human lif and now they're arguing human life is WHY they value the economy. Shove it up your God damn lying ass. If we're going to have to choose, after the failures of people like you, one path or the toher and both present potential to kill, you HAVE to choose the path that prevents the greater unknown systemic threat which is a virus that can mutate.

I’m talking about the US economy, you know, the backbone to the macro global economy. Why the fuck would we be talking about irrelevant Europe?

>believing some kike funded article
oh, user...

Which is why we should always bailout failures, right? It lowers the death rate. What a fucking pathetic slave mentality.

Holy shit you’re dumb. That’s 5 different studies cited that support the pro cyclical relationship between overall mortality and economic growth in high income countries. But you want me to go dig up one study that you probably don’t even know and just remember reading about that line about unemployment and death in some random article somewhere?

>instead you should believe random teenagers on an image board
Oh, user...

I have news for you if you think a total economic shutdown will result in less deaths.. And I don't think you will like that news.

>still can’t provide source
>thinks some random fag’s conjecture on an image board means anything to anyone
I have news for you user, and I don’t think you will like it

t. hackernews "got a source" fag

Who in their right mind cares about the population of Seattle, San Francisco, New York, Los Angeles, Detroit or Chicago?

How can you not understand that this economic shutdown has far reaching consequences. Much more than a traditional recession. Yet you are obsessed with your irrelevant studies. This is what autism looks like.

Of course it applies to those below. You're not "weak" when you're rich and powerful and virile like Trump is.

ive never seen someone so confident about something they're 100% wrong on

I've noticed you've selectively ignored my arguments. Why don't you shut your ignorant mouth? You're clearly blocking out inconvenient kill shots to this retarded lying position that you read on some blog and are repeating here.

god damn you're a retard

Orange man not just bad, Orange Man does not know how to run a country and should not have qualified to become president.

Yeah, swing for the low hanging fruit. If you ignore better arguments and win against easy ones it means you're right.

>says deaths increase during recessions
>makes up study
>gets proved wrong by actually studies
>this is what autism looks like
Kek the irony. No shit it has far reaching consequences, but as far as mortality goes the shutdown itself won’t have consequences as bad as just allowing corona to spread freely would. Next you’ll probably say who cares it’s a “boomer remover” anyway

>Seattle, San Francisco, New York, Los Angeles, Detroit or Chicago
>New York
>who gives a shit about the population of the financial capital of the world
imagine being this totally fucking retarded

Attached: 1574457282278.jpg (1280x720, 73.36K)

See I understand newfags like you have a hard time following threads though

You're arguing against 14 year olds who think they're shot shots because they read some wall street blog. They've shown no capacity for independent novel thinking in this topic.

This is not just a recession though is it? It's an economic shutdown. Far more consequences then if everyone just has to stop buying that after dinner ice cream like Americans do in normal recessions. Crazy how you can't understand this.

I don't think all of the trust fund babby/law students we had for the past 40 years were "qualified" either. The problem with politicians is that they are judged on how well they sell their image, not accomplish useful things.

Wuflu numbers are all meaningless because we don't know total cases in any of the countries. Not even close.

The only controlled study was the diamond princess cruise where 650 out of 3700 people caught it and 7 old (70+) people died.

death. what kind of retard question is that. some of us don't live in a box and work in a cubicle.

>half a million
it'll be much more than that

>You're arguing against 14 year olds who think they're shot shots
Welcome to Yas Forums, I’d have stopped coming here a long time ago if it wasn’t inexplicably hard not to check it when the markets are acting crazy just to see what all the retards and schizos are saying

"Novel" thinking
I'm glad you have at least learnt one thing during this time.

These two posts go ignored because they represent the actual proper series of responses. But kids with no comprehension of the issues who are regurgitating talking points they read can't reckon with them properly.

It's fine, I gave you fuckfaces 15 minutes to respond. I'm leaving this joke of a topic.

You do realise those studies include the Great Depression right? So unless this is literally much worse than the Great Depression it’s still relevant. And if it is worse well then in any case we’d be entering uncharted territory so whatever you or I say probably won’t hold much water in a few weeks/months time

Thanks for sharing Ted Kaczynski

They did not jump.
US started intensive testing and isolation.
Plus there are very successfull drugs being used.
But still if you can work from home I would.