You're making extrapolations based on limited, local observations. If the universe is deterministic, then it can't be chaotic and vice versa. If the actions of the universe has no intention, then whatever phenomena that occurs within it should have no intentions of any kind either. That includes all life, including humans. We are part of the universe as much as the universe is a part of us. It doesn't make sense to separate humans from the universe when we're directly spawned from it. If the universe is amoral, then everything within it should be uniform, right down to the views of human beings. The fact that humans can even come up with the concept of subjectivity means the attitude of the universe isn't neutral.
Money is the root of all evil
Sebastian Thomas
Jose Jackson
>it's just evil
Not to the person doing the raping and torturing, it's not. Personally, I hold those things to be evil, but that is my subjective interpretation of those events, I can't rightly say that evil is 'objective', because clearly it's not, given that those actions were taken by a human who obviously doesn't hold the same subjective moral convictions as me
>Maybe its just empathy with your future self
based
Easton Baker
except it isn't. That is your concept of evil.
Some chinese for example torture animals because they believe it enhances the flavour of the meat. They don't see it as "evil".
Headhunters of old didn't see eating humans as "evil".
Raping a kid wasn't "evil" in ancient muslim culture at least, maybe others aswell, how often were child marriages conducted?
What you see and accept as evil is simply a consequence of your nurture and perhaps even a part nature who knows.
Your "head" "telling" you to do things is either you subconsciously wanting to do those things, or your mind coming up with all kinds of things but only the things you think you find horrific or should find horrific trigger a response of needing god to stay away from these things. If you were to abandon "god" and just think for yourself: if you were to give in to these things, whatever they are, they would likely come with unwanted consequences no? And as such you should be able to conclude, regardless of what these "horrific things" are that purely based on the consequences you shouldn't go through with them. Now after this you might come across a situation in which a "horrific thing" comes up you can do with theoretically 0 consequences. Then you consider why it came up? Do you actually want to do it? Is it just a consequence of you being tired and your brain spinning out of control? Even in this situation you might not want to do it purely based on your perception of yourself: would you want you to do it? Apparently you describe this is a "horrific thing" and as such your conclusion should be: no.
Needing to rely on "god" or external factors for comfort and peace are by definition wrong and will eventually prove fallible when this "god" abandons you, you who should have decided by yourself what morality is without losing track of your perception of yourself.
Aiden Morales
no dumbfucks.
greed is the root of all evil
if not greed for money then it would be greed for whatever is of value to another person
fucking so tired of 2 dimension fuckwit logic Marxist retards please die
Isaac Parker
Euphoric post, fellow redditor
Christopher Lewis
>double digit iq confirmed
Ryan Barnes
No Jews are
Julian Murphy
What exactly does the rejection of an "all knowing being" based on old books and stories dating back to the Akkadians, redacted a trillion times by old men in power have to do with plebbitors?
Imagine having to rely on meme pictures because you can't pick apart someones argumentation. IQ lower than your shoesize. Theology is just an old way to keep a society coherent and semi-stable to account for individuals such as yourself that are incapable of reasoning enough to conclude what acceptable and unacceptable behaviour would be and what consequences this behaviour could have.
You can pull up current scientific theories on causality and particle behaviour and try to learn about it yourself, though I do foresee some issues in comprehending the material in your case. Keep in mind that most of these are theories and as such, as the word theory and not truth should tell you; it's a theory, not an absolute truth, because we cannot prove anything as absolute truth with our current technology.
Sebastian Smith
Gold? yellow, glittering, precious gold? No, gods,
I am no idle votarist: roots, you clear heavens!
Thus much of this will make black white, foul fair,
Wrong right, base noble, old young, coward valiant.
Ha, you gods! why this? what this, you gods? Why, this
Will lug your priests and servants from your sides,
Pluck stout men's pillows from below their heads:
This yellow slave
Will knit and break religions, bless the accursed,
Make the hoar leprosy adored, place thieves
And give them title, knee and approbation
With senators on the bench: this is it
That makes the wappen'd widow wed again;
She, whom the spital-house and ulcerous sores
Would cast the gorge at, this embalms and spices
To the April day again. Come, damned earth,
Thou common whore of mankind, that put'st odds
Among the route of nations, I will make thee
Do thy right nature.
etc.
Ryder Jackson
>cannot prove anything as absolute truth with our current technology
HOLY SHIT GET HELP YOU IDIOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH
Fucking hell the absolute state of brainlet redditors holy shit
I could show to you a perfect example of a true principle and I bet you would reject it out of hand. Do you even believe there is such a thing as objective truth? Holy shit.