You're all so naive

>dat tripcode

PatrickBatemanImpressive.gif

lol

>only I have the secret knowledge to comprehend how BSV isn't a scam
This but unironically

Attached: b7425f09de5e1df4cb5d6952714776a6.jpg (480x454, 46.18K)

>faketoshi
Trash

>mfw you've all been deceived by one of the most elaborate smear campaigns of our time

no you are stupid and your shitcoin sucks you are not a secret genius or anything just a retard that got dumped on.

if you actually read the whitepaper you wouldn't spout such ridiculous bullshit.

Keep supporting segwit shit

lmao, great projection
BSV is exactly what is described in the whitepaper, whereas BTC has been rendered a dysfunctional shitcoin

This

congrats. those of us who got into crypto because the tech was new and interesting converted to BSV first. it's the better bitcoin and there really isn't any denying it. people just don't like creg and regurgitate what other people have said to them
>it's a scam!!!! reeee
it's a better bitcoin, but if we're being honest with ourselves, that might not matter. depends on whether or not blockchain ends up being useful before the hype around it dies. so far, BTC is just a commodity that is fun to trade. not sure I like the idea of a microtransaction future desu...if its done right it might make sense, but the history of tech has me cynical.

its too bad we can't discuss this shit as nerds like we used to on the old bitcoin talk forums. there's not enough nerds in the crowd anymore that are able to offer interesting opinions. biz is all newfag retards these days who don't know anything about how any of it actually works.

Discussing it as nerds is what got us into this mess to begin with... now we are in extreme populist mode. And 2020 is an election year. We're about to see the most bizarre information war in human history play out as this thing really takes off...

Nobody is seriously preparing themselves for the possibility that BSV is going to fuck their shit up and make a lot of "experts" look like complete fools.

Attached: bsv redpill.jpg (1439x4799, 1.25M)

you are beyond clueless

Based

Dev here. BSV has some interesting work being done by Andresen sorry I meant unwriter but big blocks ultimately means locating it in a single data center. Doing that means CSW/Ayre can mine your coins into their wallets - so that’s a hard yikes from me

>BSV is exactly what is described in the whitepaper
no it's most definitely not. the whitepaper is pretty clear about how bitcoin is defined it's the longest chain with the most accumulated proof of work. this sentence makes zero sense if you allow changes to the difficulty algo from that point on you don't have bitcoin you made an other shitcoin..

it's not better unless you consider ad1d0s better than adidas. and it's not bitcoin either objectively can't be. sorry. time to toss away childish dreams and grow the fuck up and face reality!

gavin and the unwriter are on two different scale of autism.

Shut it bumder

Except there will more likely be hundreds of thousands of large scale data centers... like Satoshi said. Big blocks will be lucrative as fuck

>Andresen sorry I meant unwriter

No

>the whitepaper is pretty clear about how bitcoin is defined it's the longest chain with the most accumulated proof of work.

Bitcoin is a chain of signatures (Segwit is not), accumulated PoW only matters when miners are on the same network mining the same blocks

Attached: satoshi_serverfarms.png (1691x755, 111.45K)

Greg namefagging and false flagging.

Never change retard.

Attached: 1572645603361.jpg (218x231, 8.33K)

He did his homework

BSV will not gain real value until btc drops sub $1k and then BSV can start to overtake the crypto market.

>GHUg
Gmax really needs someone to comfort him, you guys

Attached: 271181970124_fd1244ee42_b.jpg (642x564, 87.96K)

Why do big blocks change the world?

Its the longest chain among chains with the same rules you humongous retard.

Thank you Satoshi

Attached: craig.jpg (897x500, 71.72K)

this but OP is retarded

but since it's not bitcoins ruleset it's not bitcoin. exactly.

also consider this, if the definition of bitcoin allowed minority forks to be bitcoins we would have a billion bitcoins by now... everyone would just make their own fork and insist on it being bitcoin. the nakamoto consensus takes care of it so long it's unbroken. that's our only objective definition of bitcoin. everything else is subjective. you break the nakamoto consensus and fork off with a minority chain you are an alt end of story.

BTC is broken or at least very fucking limited. it's incredibly inefficient. blockchain in general has some hard limits and for a long time has been a solution in search of a problem. it's getting better, but it won't unless you break out of your retarded thinking that iterations aren't necessary to improve. this is software ffs, we have take an iterative approach and continue to refine the codebase as it scales to adapt to new challenges. BTC core isn't capable of doing that anymore.

it was always going to end up in large data centers user. you thought a blockchain was going to be able to take up space on a mac forever? this was one of the reasons I wrote off BTC in 2009. it had obvious scaling issues. the argument was always that we'd figure it out as we needed to. cross that bridge when we get to it.... well?

actually btc with ln has literally no real hard limit on tx/s. with just 2 onchain tx you can literally make billions of translations.

think outside your box sometimes! also understand the primary purpose of the bitcoin blockchain better! maybe you will understand why it doesn't have to do fucking everything just the one thing only it can do.

Yep bitcoin forked into segwitshitcoin. Bsv is still bitcoin

BTC handles like 3-4 transactions a second....that's all it's capable of. bigger blocks are needed to scale that up.

Then put your money where your mouth is

Needs to be the top market cap

>Andresen sorry I meant unwriter
two personalities literally couldn't be more different
>ultimately means locating it in a single data center
wrong, it means that all large mining operations will operate from large data centers, just like Satoshi always intended
bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=532#msg6306
>The current system where every user is a network node is not the intended configuration for large scale. That would be like every Usenet user runs their own NNTP server. The design supports letting users just be users. The more burden it is to run a node, the fewer nodes there will be. Those few nodes will be big server farms. The rest will be client nodes that only do transactions and don't generate.
>—Satoshi
there will likely be hundreds of such operations worldwide, at least one for every developed economy

So simple to understand once you dig in to those posts of satoshi. I don't understand people don't see btc is totally fucked up. Bsv is just doing what has to be done to scale up and lower the tx fees.

of course BSV is doing that, since it's actually Bitcoin and spearheaded by Satoshi himself

Scaling up is all well and good, but there's more to the tech than money transfer.

Yeah well i am not busy with who Satoshi is. I do see that bitcoin is a protocol like tcp/ip is a protocol and it should not change it into a shitty crap protocol. The protocol should be set in stone like Satoshi said. Like you don't change a car into one with 2 wheels.

yes, bigger blocks are needed for that too, especially now that Bitcoin (BSV) has fully functional smart contracts and all manners of computational capabilities which scale

You mongloids forget the most important part. No one cares which is the actual bitcoin. People buy bitcoin, they dont care what it does or how slow it is or what is written in a stupid 10 year old paper (where some retards probably ejaculate every day on) Normies buy btc, not something which gets delisted everywhere. You nerds can suck a big dick now

no it's fucking not since it's a fork of bch and that forked off of bitcoin a long time ago it couldn't even be if it tried real hard.

also segwit is absolutely brilliant and the building block of many future developments on bitcoin. taproot is an other interesting possibly revolutionary change.

that's two bullshit in one sentence. congrats.

What it can do is micropayments without any intermediary. That's what the whitepaper is all about, that's what bitcoin is. BTC cant do that.

>no it's fucking not since it's a fork of bch

No, it's a fork from Segwit.

>taproot is an other interesting possibly revolutionary change.

Ok, so why isnt anyone building on it or talking about it? BTC has no network effects or innovation, this is a fact. Nobody cares about LN or Taproot or any of that shit.

Normies are going to play e-sport games build on bitcoin. Enterprise will build on bitcoin. Real normies don't want all that techy stuff like the lightning network (which will never work). Normies want to use like they don't even know they use bitcoin.

Everything he said is true. Do you know how I know you are a brainlet?

Normies wont even have a choice, nobody will. Big blocks will consume the entire world, it will be inescapable. Nobody will care about BTC because they have a choice, same with any other crypto.

Yep. And even if bitcoin (bsv) will fail in the future all coins will die including btc because up until now bitcoin is superior against btc or any coin out there. It literally has no competition.