While you are losing money playing with fake coins...

That's pretty gay

its the best feature

In a world based on charisma as opposed to effort women will always rise to the top because they're extremely social creatures. It's only taken a few years of them being in charge for the idea of effort to be completely disregarded and replaced with attractiveness. This is a major reason corporate innovation has come to a screeching halt.

The companies that do that will slowly go broke. China will be taking over the world, as the western economies die. If you follow the electronics market you'd know how much innovation is coming from China now.
Like cellphones or TVs - not a single western company doing anything innovative for years now. All copied from China and Taiwan.

> Devalue labor to achieve equality
> Work is really about being social and keeping up appearances in the modern world just like it was for housewives
> Structure a need for women and immigrants in this new workplace
> Spoonfeed white men on obscure batman memorabilia forums so they can invest in crypto and become filthy rich
> Mossad weakens the security of Canadian biolab and pressures a Harvard prof to collude with the Chinese under muh diversity (also thieving chinks guaranteed) to achieve a form of population control
> ????
> Profit
Oh vey it's all so simple goyim

>Young women earn more
>Eventhough young men earn more due to the gender pay gap
What kind of retarded mental gymnastics is this? Either there is a pay gap favouring young women vs young men or there isn't.

Checked. Trade pieces of deflationary Bison Bucks until you die

Attached: 1583029773934.jpg (367x332, 21.59K)

So women now work, but we aren't twice as rich. Why is that?

Because you don't have a spouse?

Attached: EPI_productivity_compensation.png (1600x1309, 402.66K)

bros did we just con women into waging for us?

Attached: 1280px-Jake_0314.jpg (1280x960, 482.75K)

I mean the labor force has doubled from men to men and women. So we have double the workers and should be making double the goods compared to demand. But things stayed the same.

>npc calls other people npcs
classic

This worries me because the Chinese CEOs won't waste all their money on drugs and pleasing white women, they're much more likely to reinvest it.

yes because wages didn't follow productivity. as seen on that graph exactly because of this most likely.

you doubled the workforce but the living expenses required to stay alive didn't change (inflation adjusted). so what happened is the workforce pushed it's own price down to equilibrium.

OP didn't link to the article, but based on the sub-heading saying "despite the gender pay gap", then i presume that it is not the "gender pay gap" that is diminishing but rather that you have an increasingly larger share of young men being neets, which make the income/wealth gap between young women and young men decrease.

marketwatch.com/story/young-women-are-getting-richer-as-young-men-get-poorer-2017-04-20-16881139
from the article
>And while more young women have been entering the workforce since 1975, young men have actually been dropping out of it. The number of men not in the labor force rose from 7.4% in 1975 to 11.2% last year.
>Of course, the women who earned the most in this study were young, single and childless, and lived in metropolitan areas. Married women outside of those city centers earned less.

>bitches who want to be yuppies get exactly what they want

Is wealth the same as quantity of goods?

> Deflationary currency that continues to lose value coupled with a fixed working week of 40 hours despite technological advances.
I'd say we're losing value from the system dude not gaining it. But people transact and empowerment means women should want to continue to transact not save (which is a traditional evil because it leda to saving for family which means fewer immigrants)

But shouldn't productively have increased? There was the same amount of demand from men and women, women still used up resources when they didn't work. So you doubled productive output, where did all those extra goods and services go?

Like in the 50s when men just worked the typical American had a modest house and car, with just the man working. Now we have men and women working, but the typical American isn't any better off, its just that now the wife has to work too.

Wealth of a society is amount of goods and services produced relative to the population. Like if the US makes a million burgers and there are million people then everyone can have one burger. But image now the US makes 2 million burgers everyone can have 2 burgers each. So when women went to work and doubled economic output, we should all have gained twice as much wealth but it didn't happen.

Checked. Thanks Chang but repeating the creation of disposable things isn't really the white way. Plus China is dead in the water now thanks to the virus. As soon as they resume full productivity things will get interesting. Check out their propaganda machine on twitter. Very few posts before the virus. Good correlation that posting equals we need to hide things shit has shit the fan. Also they only post about things close to home so you can infer from that

>women chase highest paying jobs for status, so they think they get a top tier male
>men dont care about womens status
>men realise its not worth chasing the peak income for old roasties so they dont

CEOs are nominated so it’s the fault of beta cuck simps as usual
Or maybe it’s the fact that roasties have something to prove so they work harder and cheaper

Frenchfag here, don't lump us with those mutts.

>You guys are really pathetic.
You could have said that without involving literally anyone else.

>But shouldn't productively have increased?
it did but wages departed from it because of the workforce abundance. companies are not stupid they pay the minimum what they have to.

50% or something of women over 30 will be single within 10 years lol. You think roasties are cunty now, just wait

Mining servers are timestamped at zero suck shit botnet fucking pissfags

I studied law and 90% of the top students in my year were girls. They were harder working, more attentive, and generally way more driving than people like myself who fucked around and ended up on biz. It's honestly no surprise that this is starting to be reflected in the workforce.

"Women"

>cuck fight for muh gender cap
>mr shekelsberg lower his salary to match roast hr rate
lmao

Based and redpilled.

If you say something enough normies will begin to believe it; seems to be even easier to do these days since boomers and zoomers are gullible as fuck.

It's all about controlling the narrative.

Yes but never fucking say it again or they might get wise. It's like Fight Club.

...

Oh shit.

Attached: lN6EMGhh.jpg (1024x1024, 308.8K)

>terrified confused roastie
>terrified confused boomer
>low IQ faggot who loses money trading
which one are you OP, it's 100% guaranteed you fit one of these categories

Attached: 1554439786136.jpg (766x770, 81.86K)

it's worrying. all the competent people are retiring or have retired

women work harder and smarter thats why they outpace men even though they get paid less. deal with it incel the future is female

Oh wow cellphones and tvs what great innovations

Everywhere you go you see this rhetoric. It’s always the same. There has to be some bot farm pumping this crap out, everyone knows this is false but you see this same rhetoric everywhere

>money printers bribing women with their pedophile papers
This is how they calibrate the money supply, to buy the consent of women and to keep people on subsistence level and dependent on the government.

Attached: 66BC3CFC-3143-4D51-8716-6CA0FF54AAD5.jpg (605x1024, 70.22K)

Chekkked

Attached: 46A7A45B-E7CD-4FAD-A279-6B9F3AACD318.jpg (1074x1066, 469.64K)

It's simple. We kill the Israel.
>check checked

Attached: intro-1569299591.jpg (780x439, 58K)

While you’re posting this, you’re not having sex. Kys

Hard to be an ethot when u have penis user

If they had any sense to support a family or help others maybe but they don't, we got them to wage but they only spend money on themselves.

YES

Attached: 1581277050560.jpg (847x960, 85.86K)

Ayyy

the chad FEMALE vs the virgin young male

This. Women are mostly complacent in jobs because that is generally their nature, to just do what is asked and be quiet. That isn't even a 'hurr durr weymen r dumb' thing to shit on them, just reality.
I did similar w/ my wife a year ago, and she got a better position internally, better salary, and 30+ more pto days a year.
They simply don't pursue/ask the same way men do, not to say there aren't faggy guys that keep their heads down and drone about as well, they are risk-adverse, which is why you don't see venture capitalist and stock broker companies loaded with majority women, but you will see them in the 401k plan side of investing.

There's no proof. More lies. Might as well never read the news again.

I remember at a Christmas party, we are all talking about this. The women liked the idea of making more than men, but they get pissed off when you bring up stay at home dads. They want everything both ways and it doesn't work like that.

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-11-27 at 12.00.04 AM.png (1285x263, 119.8K)

Yes. This type of stuff always comes full circle in the end.

Women will be going full nuclear looking for thirdworlders and refugees to impregnate their dried up womb