that bought almost 30 ETH worth of LP 3 days ago, and is now getting over 16 LINK per LP distribution For reference, at my measly 0.04 LP i got 0.0228 last distribution
That means this guy who just bought 27 ETH worth of LP now has 28.68 LP Or the equivalent of 975 ETH worth of LP
Thats quite literally $231,000 worth of LinkPool And he keeps buying more.
those who know haven't sold a single one it will outperform eth at the very least at ~13m effective market cap (1000 shares in circulation), it has a long way to go
t.1 of 186
Owen Scott
Yes, it appears no other node operators plans on offering staking to the public. And why would they? This would only dilute their profits with plebs. If you want to stake, Linkpool will be your only options at least for the first months
David Myers
>If you want to stake, Linkpool will be your only options at least for the first months lol it's going to be funny to see everyone rushing in to buy shares when they realize
I dunno if anyone saw it...but possibly wagyu user made a thread a few days ago and was gonna post some breadcrumbs related to staking but then never replied after a bunch of newfags swarmed his post...
Seems like interesting timing...
Luis Foster
Yes, and theres only what, 500 holders right now? Total supply of 4000, circulating supply 1000. I unironically expect 1 share to go for a million usd in a few years.
Caleb Perez
Can you find the warosu?
Jaxon Young
Ì just wonder who buys whole LP shares. They are trading for what? $7000 per share? And the service hasn't even launched yet.
Either they will really pop till launch or tumble hard.
Dylan Thompson
Have you thoroughly read the latest RealT Medium article? David Hoffman clearly talks about LINK staking and its high value contracts asking for a high staking in nodes willing to serve real state data.
Pooled nodes are the answer to serve these high value job requests. Check it out, RealT v2 can't exist without staking... It's coming
Logan Wilson
I'd rather run my own node thanks
Robert Gutierrez
I almost bought some, but I think it's overpriced compared to the potential revenue. I think buying more LINK is a better deal.
Angel Morris
this is something i struggled with ever since LinkPool ICO
i settled on buying 0.04 (the minimum amount you can buy) because i was told that LP owners will get early access to staking in LP nodes when staking goes live maybe im an idiot and more LINK would be better but at this point 0.04 LP is like $300, which is absolute pennies compared to my LINK stack
Honestly im letting my LINKies accumulate for awhile, i prob won’t stake for the first half year to start seeing the data and the risk of the node operators.
Camden Bell
staked link are guaranteed on linkpool
Eli Torres
O.O where can you even buy it, if possible. Might be too late for me and ill have to go somewhere else.
Kevin Gomez
I simply don't think $10k of LP will be more valuable than $10k of LINK after $1000 EOY.
The price has been fluctuating around 30 ETH/LP share for some time, so it seems like a relatively safe bet, if expensive.
Ethan Wood
linkpool is a scam that steals all your linkies, which is also a scam
Jordan Wright
Nope can’t even buy it as a U.S citizen.
James Long
they will eventually have to split the shares to account for the decimals probably 0.04LP shares will become 1.0LP shares in the future regardless, it will be glorious. Thank you to all the Linkpool team, very professional and skilled.
They won't. The reason the split is where it is now is because of gas costs for distribution. They picked 0.04 as the best midpoint between fine-grained share splits and lower cost for distribution.
Jordan Young
I spent all my moolah on link if it still cheap by next year ill get a share or .5 with my bonus.
Ethan Davis
That was a problem last year, but distribution gas costs are way lower now. Also, we are currently talking about 500 wallets holding LP - how would gas costs be a problem if it were 5000?
Also been watching this wallet. He seems to be market making the dex. Always having orders on both sides. Currently he is selling at 34 and rebuying at 30.
Jaxson Diaz
ok real talk anons give me the scoop on this: how legit are these guys and what's the chance they run away with the money or their whole operation goes tits up before staking is implemented? I've got like 3k linkies and last I checked I'd have to basically sell them all to get 1 LP share but I'm tempted for sure
Nathan Ortiz
When you buy LINK you are buying an asset class. When you buy LinkPool you are buying stock in an individual company.
Ryan Peterson
>what's the chance they run away with the money or their whole operation goes tits up before staking is implemented? Basically 0. Jonny, the founder, is a member of the Chainlink dev team and his node get paid directly out of Sergey's pockets. I don't see a scenario where Link succeeds and Linkpool doesn't. The only real downside is if there are dozens of large staking pools (Binance, Coinbase and so on) who will all compete for their user's Link. But come on, Linkpool's total cap is like 0.5% of Chainlink's cap. Do people really believe that Linkpool will only manage 0.5% of all network traffic? Its going to be more like 5%, in which case the shares are crazy undervalued right now. Let me say that again, if LP had 5% of Chainlink's cap then 1 share would trade for 300 ETH.
Eli Martin
No because it's bullshit and just a bunch of shitty terraform templates a monkey could write /thread
Parker Bailey
There are already 20-something nodes. Furthermore, we should expect mainstream data providers (stock exchanges, news agencies, weather agencies, title companies, insurance companies, etc) to run their own nodes.
Jose Taylor
>Furthermore, we should expect mainstream data providers (stock exchanges, news agencies, weather agencies, title companies, insurance companies, etc) to run their own nodes. while we're on the topic of this
can someone explain to me why a company wouldnt just run their own node with 0 LINK staked if I am $BigCompany and i need a LINK node to feed some data into my smart contract, whats stopping me from running a LINK node with 0 LINK staked, and then using my own node that I trust to provide accurate data (because i control it)
doesn't this effectively bypass all need for staking?
Also, no need to buy 1 LP, just buy the minimum share 0,04 and you will be fine.
Nolan Thompson
The 20 nodes don't matter at all without collaterals. What matters are the hundreds of millions of Link that will act as node collateral later. Where will they stake? A large portion will go to Linkpool.
Ryder Rogers
Many of them probably will.
Nolan Morris
Ok, guess we need to get into the basics of Link: The main use case of the Link token is for node collateral. Imagine a future world where smart contracts get fed data from nodes without collateral (and get paid for that data). What would happen? Well, everyone would set up as many nodes as they can and try to fill as many data requests as possible without even caring if their data is correct or not. This wouldn't work, there needs to be a way to punish nodes for delivering wrong data (wrong = against consensus). So if your node sends a price data of $300 per ETH, while the network censensus of the other nodes says its $200, your node will get punished and lose some of your collateral Link.
Isaac Thomas
yeah but there's really no point to that apart from earlier steaking
Jayden Martin
you ape. you've had two years to write your own templates that are so easy. why haven't you made your own company instantly worth millions ape?
Levi Wood
I sold a big bag of eng moments before their fiasco and picked up another full LP and 1k linkies. felt good. real good.
Sebastian Phillips
right but this doesnt exactly answer my hypothetical scenario
if a large company needs a link node for data, what exactly is stopping them from setting up a link node on their own, staking 0 LINK, and then exclusively using their own node to feed their own smart contract
it would be redundant for them to stake LINK in a node that they control, because they can make sure that the node is acting honestly, as it is their own node there is 0 reason for them to stake LINK on their own node that they use for their own smart contracts
you can do this now without chainlink, but it's not really decentralized is it nufag
Nolan Rivera
youre right, just trust the central power no one will exploit this.
Lucas Moore
They don't need to make smart contracts with themselves. Smart contracts are for 2 parties that don't want to risk one or both trying to weasel out of the deal.
Jose Garcia
using their own node to feed their own smart contract That is what we call centralized and they shouldn't even use smart contracts then. If any company markets such a setup as "we use blockchain, look at us" then its just shady as fuck and should be avoided.
Dominic Fisher
nobody is going to do business with you if the smart contract you offer only designates a single node that you, the counterparty, controls. especially a node without anything at STAKE kek