What the FUCK was his problem?

humans sweat, those animals do not, the only heat regulation they have is through panting

This.

>being so autistic you notice this

Attached: 1588269317124.jpg (494x703, 173.73K)

wtf this was on one of those "most disturbing cartoon episodes" where the guy said there was implied rape and prostitution in this ep. Is this true or just the usual exaggerated bullshit?

Attached: 1570061777116.png (993x1405, 1015.69K)

animals also don't walk on two legs and speak japanese.

There's nothing autistic about understanding your environment, in fact this is the opposite of being an autist.

then don't make them covered in fur

physically they are not going to be making sweat

neat animation technique.

hesrightyouknow.jpg

Attached: c00m.jpg (883x868, 65.96K)

yes, I am right

they're meant to be humanised versions of animals. Thats why they sweat. If they took away the fur it would look too weird. The artist probably didnt care about the science behind it, just wanted the aesthetic

There is nothing autistic about understanding your environment. Being unable to distinguish between your environment and works of fiction is, and applying standards of realism to cartoonish fiction, wherein animals are depicted having human characteristics (anthropomorphic, if you so will) is definitely very pedantic if not strictly speaking autistic. Ergo I would argue that both and aren't displays of great powers of perception but instead showcase how you are unable to cope with any version of things that isn't congruent with your accepted reality, which is not only autistic in the throwaway sense of internet slang, but actually remarkably close to the medical definition of autism.

Nah, pretty sure it's just stupid to put sweat over fur if you understand anything about the world m8.

>when the cartoon animals dont regulate heat realistically

Attached: 1506035238914.gif (512x502, 542.77K)

Again, I absolutely agree that if the sweat was there to depict how an animal would deal with heat, that's plain wrong and might lead to badly educated American children, since you people seem to have to refer to cartoons to understand reality.
In the clip the sweat is meant to depict the inner agitation of an upright-standing, clothed predatory animal that is confused and panicking due to an animal that in nature would be potential prey preparing to perform sexual acts on the former animal. While there may have been other ways to convey the inner turmoil of our protagonist, you may be willing to agree that it functions quite well in transporting this very human emotion.
It was – dare I say it – an artistic choice in service of narration and emotional nuance instead of plain lack of understanding of the world.

What the fuck is going on in this thread

if a cartoon rabbit wanted to give a cartoon wolf a blowjob should the wolf perspirate or pant to release heat?

Someone has taken it personally someone pointing out depicting animals as sweating looks dumb.

Definitely not that dark, but it is about an abusive relationship

BWC (Big Wolf Cock)

I'm sure you don't come from a country where a significant portion of the population answered on a survey that they didn't know bacon and pork came from the same animal.

autism but to be fair, thats normal here

does this person also understand that the fucking cartoon just pastes an animal head on a human body with an animu pastiche?

Attached: animalanime.png (280x727, 193.37K)

their lack of creativity is on display, yes

In fact I do not, thanks for recognising. I doubt anyone around here would waste their time and money on such a survey, but if someone happened to pay the people for answering I'm positive the majority would know.

>bruh you can't just make animals sweat
>bruh why aren't you more creative with your anthropomorphic animals
Make up your fucking mind, folks.

if it's the UK then I'm afraid that you do, they're the only ones that obsess over Americans anyway.

Quite the opposite, I'm just practising my English since I can't sleep and the autistic user who couldn't let it go seemed like a good target. I have little interest in the actual topic of discussion.

Neither do I live in the UK nor do I or other people from around here tend to obsess about Americans. In fact, overall my countrymen had high opinions of the US until quite recently. But then again I doubt my nationality or anything about my person in general is of relevance to any of my previous posts.

You brought the subject of nationality onto the table, so tell me how relevant that is in the course of this discussion beyond posturing trolling.

Incel dogs, you know how they are.