Fuck Harry Potter

Bulletproof spell ?

>How do Harry Potter fans get over
they're either retarded or NPCs. not that hard to understand.

they probably wouldn't work on wizards

I'm more inclined to question why Harry Potter fans who read the books can even get any enjoyment out of the heavy butchering of the story the movie goes through.
They skip so much! So many details and important character that just pop out of nowhere in later movies because previous directors forgot to introduce them. Also the entire James Potter flashback is just straight up gone. There's no impact when you don't even see how close James, Ratman, Wolfman and Dogman were to each other.

Well if knives are banned one would assume that firearms would be too

Muggles on average don't really know or care that wizards exist, they're just weird magic Amish people. Voldemort is the only true threat to both worlds and shooting him with a gun would be fucking laughable, the dude was running around launching hurricanes at populated areas before Harry bamboozled him into killing himself.

>I'm more inclined to question why Harry Potter fans who read the books
as livid bookfag even as kid that dislike any movie past the second, it's because they have seen the movie first so they consider it the ''main'' media

I think most people just accept that the movies are a bit shit compared to the books. My wife fucking adores Harry Potter and she re-reads all the books once a year over the course of a couple weeks. We have never rewatched one of the movies together in its entirety in the time we've known each other.

>It's a "wizard moves faster than bullet-speed" episode.

youtu.be/GzeKW6ww-A4

Black could be anywhere

Attached: 5244C5BC-D112-4B59-89E6-997333348FCE.png (499x690, 596.99K)

Still, there was some powerful magic in the series that could maim, kill or worse any person. They really hold themselves up

I remember when I saw PoA the first time I didn't even realize "marauders" are James and his buddies.

I didn't like the movies 4th one onwards, story-wise, but I still was onboard for presentation and casting. Also Emma and Evana.

>There's no impact when you don't even see how close James, Ratman, Wolfman and Dogman were to each other.
Well they can't show a gay orgy in a kids movie user.

Are people read all of the books? I skipped some pages seriously what the writer think with those size of the books?

>
>Are people read all of the books? I skipped some pages seriously what the writer think with those size of the books?

Attached: images.jpg (225x225, 9.71K)

I remember a long time ago reading an interview with Rowling where she said the reason wizards stayed hidden is basically because muggles could still wipe the floor with them, due to technology and numbers. She's probably retconned this though, it was from before the series even was finished.

same with bnha, whats the point of powers when the users are still weak human beings

>Are people read all of the books? I skipped some pages seriously what the writer think with those size of the books?

Attached: 1515271656467.png (625x773, 127.11K)

you are one motherfucking dumb piece of retarded garbage

Attached: fhfh.gif (458x294, 997.76K)

>Harry Potter fans
You mean women? They don't think about it.

I think the better question is how do Harry Potter fans get over the fact that it's the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though r-right
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: 1473063744424.jpg (1623x2886, 1.27M)

>not a fan
>knows the rules

Dumbest post I've read this week.

>guns in Bongland
Are you havin a laff?

Based beyond belief

based

>Are people read all of the books?
MY FUCKING SIDES
srsly, you should have read those extra-pages as a child

whatarefriends.jpg