for me it's kinoberg
Which david is more based Yas Forums?
Other urls found in this thread:
Who is the hack to the left and why did you make this gay thread?
david chase
>sex-obsessed peverted kike
>sex-obsessed peverted TM conman
Neither
Based
I think Lunch is more based, but Kinoberg is better filmmaker.
Commendatori
Lunch
Chronesdiesease is funnier. He was the best part of Nightbreed.
It's Lynch, don't be absurd.
Yeah he was good in that kek. Came off as genuinely fucked in the head.
Cronenberg is a bona fide cineastic genius of the highest order. His worst film is still a 8/10.
David Lynch is a great and criminally underrated musician. He is also a mediocre and criminally overrated film maker.
Cronenberg makes boring lifeless shit that people pretend to have deep subtext. David Lynch makes absolute art. His work can be hilarious, frightening, mysterious, whimsical, sensual, sexual, otherworldly, satirical, and so much more. Often in the same scene. Cronenberg has NO style and paperthin stories stretched out pretentiously. Even if you think Lynch is an art fag at least the man has style to burn.
Based duality of man
Ohhhhh no no no
Completely agree, Stone's gone up is Kino as fuck
youtube.com
I don't know why but I was rereading Dune and now I can only picture Cronenberg as Thufir Hawat
david coronaberg
Both Lynch albums are 10/10 driving albums
FINCH'D
David Cameron.
David lynch is far better and its not even close.Cronenberg has never made a great film.
the fly.
suck my dick. Lynch I actively avoid.
I recently watched all of Cronenberg's films, seeing some for the first time. I think his concepts are brilliant and highly original and he is a great director. Still, I prefer Lynch. Cronenberg has only made a few films that I would consider to be great works (Crash, Videodrome, Eastern Promises) but Lynch's track record is nearly flawless.
That's David Cronenberg, ya dumb fuuuuuck
Left. Lynch is a fucking hack.
Lynch.
For me he can do no wrong. Maybe On the Air but nobodies perfect.
both are shit who use gimmicks to trick their audience
Spider and A History of Violence are great. So are all his 80's movies. I would also still go with Lynch, though.
By your flawless logic all movie directors are hacks
Is this name cursed? Two luciferians who make meaningless films with their great talents.
It's Lynch, don't be absurd.
Not that user but film directors that don't use gimmicks
> Sam Peckinpah
> Michael Cimino
> Francois Traffaut
> Andrei Tarkovsky
> George Lucas (American Graffiti)
Congratulations on identifying a useless shitposter who's only opinion is how everything sucks and is gay.
The next step is cutting them off from the dopamine rush they get when they have a (You).
How are Dead Ringers and Videodrome not great films?
The Fly is honestly one of Cronenberg's weaker efforts desu
it is one of his weaker, and way more than enough to sing his praises... was the point chum.
can you actually PROVE they are "Luciferians" AT ALL, in ANY way? or are you just basing this on memes made by schizos?
Lol Peckinpah's gimmick was slow-mo
No I fully agree "The Fly" being one of your weak films is a gigantic testament to how good his stuff is
solid. we can now match bowls and be brothers.
>Nightbreed
Good call my guy.
Werner Lynch or David Herzog?
You are the dumbest person in this thread.
>I was rereading Dune
I stand corrected. It is in fact you who is the dumbest person in this thread.
TM is real
Based transcendental meditator.
wHO would win? DAVAD vs DIID
That's not a gimmick, that's a serious technique.
I don't look at memes, I'm basing this off their films and interviews. Lynch is literally an open advocate for Trancendental meditation and makes films that aren't about anything (serving the devil with his talent). Cronenberg made Existenz which is gnostic but also asserts that Christ is a false-God. He also directed The Fly which is about how there's no God, and he stars in an actual pagan propaganda film by that piece of shit director of Hellraiser that I won't even bother to look up the name of.
cronenbrothers
don't be rude dude
Your faith is silly.
AHoV is great but not as good as I had remembered it. The script is very pulpy and, apart from the plot which is very original, there are a lot of cliches throughout. I'm surprised Eastern Promises isn't as talked about. It's script is great and it has similar themes to AHoV but executes them in more clever and subtle ways.
You didn't respond to me (You asked what my proof was, I gave it to you, you changed the subject) because I proved that I was right.
kek
i did respond to you... your complete belief system is stupid. It is a leg sweep. You died from overwhelming reality.
His name is Clive Barker and yes he's a homo
>makes films that aren't about anything
They are, they all have very simple and actually very wholesome messages. I'm not trying at all to be a snide cunt claiming you've been Lynched because it took me years to understand Twin Peaks or Lost Highway, something I've also never seen any Yas Forums user truly express any understanding of despite the amusing L Y N C H E D quips.
Twin Peaks, from front to back, is about television itself, how its consumable violence rots your brain.
Lost Highway has two texts, the surface story about the Brown-Simpson/Goldman slayings and the subtext about directors ripping him off, especially Oliver Stone.
>Cronenberg made Existenz which is gnostic but also asserts that Christ is a false-God. He also directed The Fly which is about how there's no God, and he stars in an actual pagan propaganda film by that piece of shit director of Hellraiser that I won't even bother to look up the name of
It's called being a Jew. He's a brilliant director though (so is Lynch) and you sound like a huge faggot who needs to go get some fresh air.
absolutely left