We'll have a little bit of everything, but not too much, I'm not greedy

>im sorry gryffindor, but slytherin won fair and square.

Attached: santa.jpg (720x484, 241.15K)

I didn't say crack I said meth

What good are you then? *knifes him*

>accio diabetes

Yer a muggle harry

Attached: download.jpg (225x225, 8.69K)

Methinks it's emblematic when the curious monetary exchanges prove to be one of the most memorable parts of an entire magical universe; try as you might but you will never find a "gold standard" within the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though

"No!"

The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: 9971690A-25A2-4B46-88CB-3ABFECF9D779.jpg (1601x2886, 3.13M)

My mistake, but Ron isn't mexican either.

>how much for your old greasy pussy?

*Hermione walks in*

How can they provide 3 meals a day of good food every single day, but they can't afford to give the kids a goodie bag on the train twice a year?

>copypasting literally the only part you have to contribute to
Fifty points from whatever lazy house you represent

My mom didn't let me take any from the home lab so all I got is some street speed leftovers from my brothers. It's okay, the yellow colour is just the caffeine it's cut with.

FLIPENDO!

Attached: FLIPENDO.jpg (480x360, 80K)

>'ey love, 'ow much to cop a squizz at your tits? go on, flop 'em out

How are the teacher paid? What are the tuition fees at Hogwarts? Why does Harry get to do all these dangerous activities without his parent or guardian's permission?

>We'll take the lot
>Immediately flings it all out the window
>NOW WHO'S STARVING IN A CUPBOARD? YOU ALL ARE!

>How are the teacher paid?
With money

based and unhingepilled

sweet vengeance

Excited to mog his new "friend"

Based

Harry Potter and the Psychotic Break