There was nothing he could do, was there?

It's his home, plus he was innocent. If it were me? I'd hope truth would prevail in the end until I get shot and feel like a martyr

why not both

killing yourself is probably a losing scenario too desu

lol

Why are children such little shits?
My sister's daughter claims that her parents beat her. She's obviously lying because she keeps changing the story but the very idea of children manipulating people like that makes me want to have nothing to do with them.

It’s ok BB, I’m here for your now

No you would get shot and people would still think you were a pedophile, even if the little bitch admitted to lying about it.

They want attention and don't actually know what they're saying
If they aren't getting enough attention from mum and dad at home, they'll start saying weird shit they've heard elsewhere to get reactions and attention

It's not about attention, she's just doesn't want to do her homework.

Thats why you never refuse a love sick cunny. Give in to her demands.

I'd still gamble on truth prevailing, for justworld reasons

I don't know if it's a meme to pretend he's not a pedo, but it's clear as day that he is, the film not only makes quite obvious allusions to it throughout the film, but hammers it into the viewers head at the end with the very symbolic scene.
Mads it in the forest, hunting with his friends when suddenly he departs from them and goes on his own, symbolic of him hunting a wildly different thing (children in this case), now comes the most important sequence in the film, a shadowy figure ontop of the hill looks down on Lucas and aims a gun at him, shooting a warning shot. Let's break this down, Lucas (biblical name for Bringer of Light, the shadowy figure is illuminated by the morning sun, hence the bringer of light) with this it's clear as day that the shadowy figure is Lucas himself, and the higher positioning obviously alluding to him being the super ego of Lucas, whereas the Lucas we've been following is the id, the carnal one, slave to the pleasures of flesh.
What this proves is, Lucas is in constant battle with himself, fighting to keep that monster in chains. His morality is judging him at all times, his wants and actions. The townspeople and how they behave towards Lucas is his own projection as to how they should treat him, rather than how they're actually treating him. His own psyche subconsciously picking up these ubiquitous but concealed derisive feelings towards him and amping them up to be more than they actually are.

The film is a brilliant case study of the inner workings of a pedofile stifling his own desires and coming to terms with his actions.

kek, no. The director confirmed he was innocent.

the same one who said this?
>When I wanted to do the rape scene, I explained to [Annika Wedderkopp] that I was going to hit her and rape her. There was no emotional relationship between us, because I had put a clause in all the children’s contracts stating that they would not get treats from the director. We had never talked to each other. I knew nothing about her. We went to the basement with two other people: the photographer and a technician. No one else. I said, ‘I’m not going to rehearse. There will be only one take because it will be impossible to repeat. Roll the cameras only when I signal you to.’ Then I told her, ‘Pain does not hurt. Hit me.’ And she hit me. I said, ‘Harder.’ And she started to hit me very hard, hard enough to scratch a rib... I ached for minutes. After she had hit me long enough and hard enough to tire her, I said, ‘Now it’s my turn. Roll the cameras.’ And I really... I really... I really raped her. And she screamed.”

name one scene that explicitly points it out

when he talks with his friend and the guy tells him “there was no basement” he winks at Mads’ character - you just know he was in on it

It's at best merely ambiguous as to his guilt, but it heavily leans towards innocence you gotta do some gymnastics to come away thinking he's guilty
>Lame as psycho-film-analysis
Boring

are you retarded? we literally saw in the movie when the little shit made up the lie because she saw her brother watching porn, and the stronk weman principal blowing shit up on Mads with zero evidence

Attached: 1581129899186.png (162x191, 65.63K)

There is no winning after being accused. Just look at the McMartin Preschool Panic.
youtube.com/watch?v=2R21tWs-qCw

This.
Men have no rights when this kind of thing happens. You're guilty as long as anybody _feels_ that you're guilty, and even people who don't agree will shun you to avoid catching your cooties.
stop getting your opinions from blogs

reach

>I'd still gamble on truth prevailing, for justworld reasons
Imagine being 12.

50 posts none tell the movie...

haha

how do you not know the movie

Jagten

buffoon

and there is a scene where we see him calling her and telling her what’s his fetish
>behave like an adult please

Death Stranding

>in addition to having been sexually abused, they saw witches fly, traveled in a hot-air balloon, and were taken through tunnels.[6] When shown a series of photographs by Danny Davis (the McMartins' lawyer), one child identified actor Chuck Norris as one of the abusers.[23]
>children being flushed down toilets to secret rooms where they would be abused, then cleaned up and presented back to their parents.

Attached: fuckthemkids.jpg (1024x1024, 82.13K)

Reminds me of that film "Brothers" (I think it's called that) with Tobey Maguire. His kid starts saying his wife had an affair with his bro.

Nice symbolic analysis but the harder facts of the film prove otherwise.

In this day and age rumors tend to follow people