>People would live like medieval serfs 13 years after nuclear bombs are set off
>People would shoot any looters as if ammo conservation wasn't a thing at all
>It would be cold 24/7, even during summer (???)
>There would be NO happy times at all, just pure misery
>Russians wouldn't bother invading
>Nobody would make any attempt to fix any kind of machinery in, again, 13 fucking years
>Everyone would work by hand with improvised tools for 13. years.
>Roofs would remain collapsed, doors would remain blown apart, bodies would lie in the street. For. 13. YEARS.
>MOST REALISTIC DEPICTION OF NUCLEAR WAR EVER!!!!
Can we range ban british people or what? I feel like I was duped into watching this.
Threads (1984)
Nicholas Rivera
Other urls found in this thread:
Jonathan Ward
Forgot to mention that nobody ever attempts to set up any kind of government, even small scale, in that time. It's just every family for themselves with constant fighting for the rest of eternity.
Oliver Hill
It's a bit silly but that's what 80s scaremongering looked like
Jacob Bailey
It's realistic in that it looks like a documentary more than it does a regular movie. Other than that, I don't know if anyone has ever said it's a realistic representation of what humanity would actually do in the event of nukes.
There's a thing called suspension of disbelief, look into it.
Levi Lee
Also there's still schooling.
Gabriel Hughes
Don't forget kids being incapable of speaking english for no apparent reason
Austin Wilson
lmao is that what that muttering was at the end?
William Barnes
Not sure what the point of your bait post is supposed to be.
Literally every single line of your greentext is literally exactly what would happen.
Easton Price
>t's realistic in that it looks like a documentary more than it does a regular movie.
>There's a thing called suspension of disbelief, look into it.
There's a thing called a dictionary, look up what "realistic" means. Giving a grounded appearance has nothing to do with realism.
Xavier Baker
Why wouldn't there be schooling? Someone has to educate kids while the parents toil the mud farms.
Ryan Nguyen
People wont try to restore civilization in the slightest, just use up old resources and create nothing themselves? Maybe that's what you'd do faggot
Elijah Adams
>People would live like medieval serfs 13 years after nuclear bombs are set off
The entire ecosystem supporting humanity has been pretty much destroyed. Since oil production has been nuked, machinery is useless
>People would shoot any looters as if ammo conservation wasn't a thing at all
Yes.
>It would be cold 24/7, even during summer (???)
It's called nuclear winter, zoomie.
>There would be NO happy times at all, just pure misery
Most likely.
>Russians wouldn't bother invading
They're too busy scratching through dirt to survive to bother with that shit.
>Nobody would make any attempt to fix any kind of machinery in, again, 13 fucking years
Electrical grid would be blown out, and again, no more oil.
>Everyone would work by hand with improvised tools for 13. years.
Again, this is probably what life would look like.
>Roofs would remain collapsed, doors would remain blown apart, bodies would lie in the street. For. 13. YEARS.
Everybody is too busy starving to death.
>MOST REALISTIC DEPICTION OF NUCLEAR WAR EVER!!!!
More accurate than most.
>Forgot to mention that nobody ever attempts to set up any kind of government, even small scale, in that time. It's just every family for themselves with constant fighting for the rest of eternity.
There was a government. They had uniforms and guns and forced everyone to work just like before the nukes went off.
Are you tarded, OP?
Robert Foster
>people trying to get by
>are exhausted every evening
>hey let's brainstorm for 10 hours about how we can ramp up the production of smartwatches again
Yeah, I'm gonna go with the idea that you are the brainlet here
Luke Gomez
Have you been around council estates?
Kayden Flores
t. global nuclear war expert
Liam Ramirez
What's a council estate? Sounds fancy.
Benjamin Martinez
Imagine getting pleb filtered by threads, lmao
Ian James
it wasn't supposed to be a documentary
Bentley Flores
>Russians wouldn't bother invading
So did you just read the IMDB summary, or...?
Brody Stewart
We're talking about literally not clearing any debris or repairing any vital structures/tools, dude. This shit is essential to survival.
Cameron Cooper
That's exactly how they live right now without a nuclear bomb blowing up their country.
Adam Wilson
Were those soldiers with the british accents supposed to be russian or what?
Explain your point and maybe I can respond to it instead of this ad hominem.
Henry Cruz
You didn't watch the movie.
Camden Foster
In america you call them the projects
Landon Brown
Yes it does. That's why the appearance is grounded as opposed to another adjective.
Isaac Lopez
Ooh, ooh I can do it too!
>You didn't watch the movie.
Owned, nerd.
Gabriel Cook
So if I make a docudrama about wizards and elves you'd call it gritty and realistic? Get the FUCK out of this thread.
Zachary Thompson
Honestly, the film would've been much better if they cut out the daughter part entirely and made the daughter being the stillbirth.
The nuke scene is probably one of the most horrifying things I've seen, though.
Aaron Hall
>Explain your point and maybe I can respond to it instead of this ad hominem.
Sheffield caught ONE nuke from the many, many nukes that were thrown that afternoon.
Most of the nukes went to Russia and the US. Now, taking into account the fact that Russia received roughly half of the nukes, and Sheffield only received one nuke, do you think there's a reason why people are calling you retarded for questioning why Russia didn't immediately invade Sheffield?
Camden Morris
Its literal. An estate owned by the council. They build shit housing on it for poor people.
Mason Garcia
>why Russia didn't immediately invade Sheffield?
Hand over all the stainless steel
Kevin Cooper
>immediately
We're talking about 13 years, not immediately.
Also the point is moot because Russia was the aggressor here. Do you really think they'd start a nuclear war without planning on sheltering people? It's also fucking impossible to wipe out Russia like it is the UK because of how spread out their population is.
I'm mostly questioning why they would bother bombing a city they have no intention to do anything with.
Nathaniel Williams
If you shoot it in a way that's grounded, yes, I will say it's aesthetically similar to a documentary.
>Get the FUCK out of this thread
No. I'm here forever.
Ayden Garcia
>Takes one point out of many and responds only to it
Parker Thomas
>>It would be cold 24/7, even during summer (???)
there's a reason it's calling a nuclear winter
Adam King
imagine seriously responding to a clearly weak bait made by a braindead op
Grayson Green
>It's also fucking impossible to wipe out Russia like it is the UK because of how spread out their population is
You only need to bomb the major cities in the west and there is no more Russia.
Their population is also much more dependent on arable farming which would be totally annihilated by the nuclear winter.