Reminder that if you download x265 rips you might as well be downloading YIFY

You quality fags are as bad as audiophile niggers. I stream shit at whatever quality I can get and never had a problem.

Anything past 720p x264 is soulless

its kinda funny. i stream my crap at 480p on the reg. i know no difference with shit

>lossy codec nigger wants to complain about quality

It's not just sizes. It's the x265 algorithm itself.
How do you think x265 compresses the image to save so much space? It gets rid of 'noise', except a lot of that 'noise' actually contributes to picture detail.
It's even worse when the x265 encode is a reencode of a x264 rip.
The only scenario where x265 is acceptable is when it's a cartoon with sharp edges and solid colours like Archer, Bob's Burgers, Regular Show etc.
I'm watching a copy Jeremy Brett's Sherlock Holmes in 1080p HEVC (the only quality I can find) and it's a blurry fucking mess.

I noticed that too when trying to encode some videos I have in .265 to lower their file size. Quality was not maintained. They just got blurrier.

for animation x265 is a winner
for new films, x265 is still better
for old films x264 is better due to excessive grain
try to find 3-4GB encodes of x265, and never re-encodes from x264 rip

no one even films in 35mm anymore

I mean, I can tell the difference, to a point. It just doesn't bother me at all.

sometimes it's how they film it, MI 1 has this problem

Attached: Sherlock-Holmes-1984-S01-E01-A-Scandal-in-Bohemia-1080p-Bl2.jpg (1440x1080, 650.37K)

This

This thread reads like another language. I have no idea what you are talking about.

t. plebs
this was me a couple months ago till i sucked up my laziness and googled x264 and x265 also
t. pleb

Left is better

hello pleb department

Attached: 1586647524883.jpg (750x638, 49.11K)

So you’re telling me HEVC at the same file size as x264 is worse?

x264 and x265 (also known as HEVC) are both video compression algorithms.

x264 is the older one and was designed for 1080p Videos. It wasn't designed for 4K or streaming and has issues with macroblocks (where you see images with faint squares with slightly differing colours)

x265 is now starting to get wide adoption and is more streaming friendly, works better for 4K, has lower filesizes and lessens macroblocks. However it uses orders of magnitude more CPU than h264 and has different strengths/weaknesses to it, hence this thread.

the brainlet strikes again

Went back to 480p x265 and 264 DVD rips and it most certainly does not hold up
That's a weird ass resolution user
Get your eyes tested and a better screen
Rub the cum out of your fogged soiglasses
1080p fag here this is tru
Even 1080p content can look like absolute shit and requires 10x the file size compared to an equivalent x265 rip

Companies are in favor of AV1 over x265. The reason AV1 started is because companies don't want to pay for x265. AV1 is open source and royalty-free.It's still early in it'a development and continues to improve. But x265 will be dropped for it.

aomedia.org/the-alliance-for-open-media-kickstarts-video-innovation-era-with-av1-release/

Attached: 13_AOMedia_AV1_Innovation_Is_Driven_by_the_Entire_Video_Ecosystem.jpg (1999x1125, 272.11K)

>left: factory standard picture setting on new TVs
>right: calibrated picture setting on new TVs