Why is this allowed?

I also hate that oversharpening

>that website trying to take credit for screencapping a tweet

Attached: just_walk_away.gif (480x354, 1.48M)

It's not zoomers, it's people who don't know any better. Plenty of braindead boomers don't like having black bars on the screen either, and plenty of people just don't know that what they're watching is cropped

>It's not zoomers
t. zoomer

Shouldn't the fact that I'm a zoomer who cares about watching films and shows in their proper aspect ratio tell you something about your original statement?

No.

There are also 80s kid who love the Beatles, it doesn't change the average of the generation

what do you mean? except for the cropping, the image below looks much better

>the image below looks much better
no you need to die if you are serious

So then it isn't zoomers, it's the average zoomer, which even then, I still think most of them are just uneducated on aspect ratios, which is also true with quite a few older folks who just want their entire screen filled. If you think that I'm wrong about that, then why were they okay in the past with pan and scans made to fit their 1.33 tvs?

Buffy the Vampire Slayer is HD is fucking atrocious. The whole show was shot on 16:9 cameras and then cropped and framed for 4:3. Some foreign dvds actually had it uncropped and in widescreeen from season 4 onward and while occasionally you could see crew people and equipment in the sides of shots it was still watchable. Instead the remastering team decided to crop the 4:3 images into widescreen and the whole show's a fucking mess now.

Plus they forgot to re-apply color filters so now certain scenes that took place at night clearly take place during daytime.

Attached: buffy hd cropping.jpg (2048x1556, 89.04K)

it's not oversharpening retard, it's a better scan of the original cel

>Film Pan and Scan
Formerly movie's

>"hey user why do you pirate shit"

>it's not oversharpening retard, it's a better scan of the original cel
you're wrong
you can see a halo around the border line of that presenting character in red jacket
that's sharpening

Usually this is a good thing, but in the case of The Simpsons, I think it does look worse. It looks like the cels weren't made very well, and the color bleeds out of the lines fairly often, but you don't notice it that much in SD

>It looks like the cels weren't made very well, and the color bleeds out of the lines fairly often
it was accounting for crt technology being brighter and fuzzier
videogames used that as advantage too.

what is the ultimate form one could experience this kino?

Attached: Lawrence.of.Arabia.1962.1080p.BluRay.x264.DTS-FGT.mkv_snapshot_00.28.37_[2015.07.13_15.42.35].jpg (1920x876, 210.98K)

>what is the ultimate form one could experience this kino?
a 70mm film projector

Probably a restored 70mm film print post mid-80s where they found and restored all the missing footage.

But even watching SD Simpsons on a modern screen, it still isn't very noticeable

wrong, retard.

iPhone

I could never watch Ghostbusters 2 on tv because the pan and scan was just so awful.

I'm working at a TV and this is no longer allowed. Our company has no rights to make changes to the content that distributor provides.