Will movies be fully computer generated in the future?
Will movies be fully computer generated in the future?
Charles Carter
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtu.be
thispersondoesnotexist.com
twitter.com
Evan Martinez
Yes.
Aaron Allen
as soon as they figure out the formula to making an animated character as compelling as an actor, yes. Right now every single movie is built as a vehicle for the star to get awards and it ruins many otherwise decent films. If producers can cut out actors entirely it would improve the overall quality of films.
Camden Thompson
No, but they will be 90% computer-generated/enhanced with live actors attached for name recognition. For the past several years, Disney (and likely other studios as well) have been developing technology allowing them to "fix" actors' performances in post-production, either by combining multiple takes or creating an entirely new output. This, combined with advances in greenscreen rendering (real-time motion tracking instead of months of rendering) means that movies will be produced much more quickly, efficiently, and cheaply. At the end of the day, that's the only real goal of these companies. youtube.com
Matthew Foster
All that already happened over ten years ago.
Have you seen ringo?
youtube.com
Aaron Gray
Rango was still a purely animated movie that filmed the VAs for the animators to visually reference--it wasn't motion-capture. A novel technique, but still a far cry from digitally manipulating live footage of actors to create the illusion of a more compelling performance.
Xavier Stewart
They already did, ten years ago, check out what Robert down jr has to say about it.
youtu.be
Austin Bell
>Will movies be fully computer generated in the future?
There will be a brief period where attractive people license their image to Hollywood studios, but then AI will be able to create beautiful humans from scratch. At that time, the studios will begin to wean audiences off of expecting a big name to headline the movie.
I also predict that deepfakes will lead to an explosion in CP videos in the next few years, where the producers take girls from southeast Asia, dye their hair blonde, and deepfake the faces of attractive white children over them.
Mason Young
>Will movies be fully computer generated in the future?
The non-Family.
Kayden Myers
Exactly. My point is that it's becoming more widespread to the point where only the actors themselves will be real, and even they won't be 100% "real." Even the costumes won't always be real: the time travel suits in Avengers Endgame were added on in post-production because they hadn't finished designing them. Time is money, and studios will do anything to save money in the short term.
Leo Taylor
The question is: could you even tell?
Christopher Cook
Where do i even start. First off, people want to watch people, its human nature.
CGI overlays to make them look sexy will continue, but no one is going to be "weaned" off of real actors standing and moving on screen.
That's just a retarded notion of someone who doesn't want famous individuals to exist out of jealousy.
Besides, entirely digital people will always take too many touch-up artists to look normal and so will always be less efficient.
Also your deepfake CP comment is just a sexual fantasy and it legitimizes the rest of what you said.
Parker Edwards
Hollywood will create artificial celebs that post on Twitter and have fake social lives. Thats all anyone wants out of actors these days.
Jacob Jenkins
No you were disagreeing with my point until I showed you that video of Robert Downy.
You said and im quoting you
>A novel technique, but still a far cry from digitally manipulating live footage of actors to create the illusion of a more compelling performance.
Christian Bailey
Have you seen this? thispersondoesnotexist.com
I'm sure in the future you won't know if the person on screen exists or not
Reminds me of that Al Pacino movie S1m0n3
John Powell
>normalfag vtubers
weebs in the avant garde yet again
Benjamin Collins
Perhaps.
Adrian Sanders
Watch Looker and be awestruck at Michael Crichton calling this shit forty years out.
Thomas Edwards
Dazzle guns, too.
Zachary Rivera
Those hand guards around on those guns are stupid.
Levi Rivera
Wait until they start remaking/re-editing classics using dead people's faces animated by CGI.
It's easy to see this coming thanks to SW Rebels.
Cameron Watson
I’m saying your example of Rango didn’t fit the criteria of what I was describing. I agree with your observation that the technology has been in use for a while now, but it is becoming much more prominent.
Wyatt Edwards
>company made billions upon billions of dollars from the FF video games alone
>somehow this one movie completely obliterated the companies finances, caused them to sell out and fire their main guy
I still don't understand and no one has been able to explain it to me what exactly happened.
Brody Harris
I don’t think it was the entire company, just the film division which operated as a separate company.
Samuel Turner
God. They can milk any movie franchise forever.
Angel Morales
there's an animated movie about this called The Congress that was pretty good
Aiden Jenkins
I heard the new GiTS is great, setting a paradigm for all future kino. Five years from now it will be the standard.
Tyler Brooks
I liked this movie
Leo Evans
lol
Christian Kelly
CG animation can't be kin....
Chase Wood
Now someone post the ones from RESIDENT Evil