If the first one already had the capability to destroy a planet why the fuck would you make the second one 10 times...

If the first one already had the capability to destroy a planet why the fuck would you make the second one 10 times bigger

Attached: D41200D6-D375-455D-A152-C2D5A57D446E.png (2208x1242, 3.56M)

Creative bankruptcy.

What do they eat?

What was sheevs tax policy?

Because that wasn't the flaw in the death star. It obviously lacked defensive capabilities

>all planets are the same size

Let system governors decided on their own, they all would pay a percentage to the Empire though.

So the Rebellion would ask that same question, dismiss it as Imperial arrogance, and then lead an assault with all of their main force so you could wipe it all out at once. Empire lost because Sheev decided his sidequest with Luke was more important than wiping out the Rebellion.

>Though designed in the likeness of its predecessor's appearance and function, the DS-2 Death Star saw a technical improvement through the incorporation of millions of millimeter-sized heat-dispersion tubes in place of the two-meter-wide thermal exhaust port exploited by the Rebel Alliance at the Battle of Yavin.

I googled it

To destroy 10 planets duh

Have to spend that budget, otherwise it gets reduced the next time around.

Why not just put a grate or a few Z-curves in the exhaust tunnel?

All it would take is a few extra shots. Conga line of Y-wings and X-wings lobbing missiles down the hole.

I don't like the idea of ceding control to the governors. Say one of them rebels. Are you going to blow up his planet? The people may have been loyal. You just lost a revenue source.

That's not how it worked. The torpedo caused a chain reaction. It didn't physically travel all the way down the shaft.

Fear will keep them in line.

>The people may have been loyal.
>he doesn't know about nu-canon
Empire had orders to open fire on all of their own major supporting cities in the event of the Emperor's death. No, I don't know why.

You have to finish the side quests before you finish the ending user, otherwise you don't get the mega good ending

Surely the best play is to use that material to make multiple original sized deathstars and keep them in groups of about 3, unless the deathstar2 is for killing suns?

To destroy bigger planets

To destroy a bigger planet

If history has taught me one thing it's that leaders can and will put their lives and and their people's lives at risk based on a whim or bout of manic depression.

The Sith are a religion of senseless malice and petty spite.

>nu wars faggotry

>why the fuck would you make the second one 10 times bigger

Especially when in doing so you are making a bigger target that could more easily be hyperspace rammed into by a single unmanned X-wing fighter.

Attached: 1587225163031.jpg (267x338, 33.08K)

Why make a second death star 10 times bigger instead of making 100 second death stars 10 times smaller than the first death star? you could use them to destroy the rebel fleet. you could call them space ships or something, I dunno

So the audience knows the stakes have been raised, how will they know that this is a sequel unless its the same thing but bigger?

Sheev was mob boss?

Wait what? No I’m pretty sure it did, or at least most of the way down z curves?

Because every planetary leader in the Empire System would start acting like the big shot in charge

the canon is all over the place for the actual sizes of the Death Stars. Some say they were 120 and 160km, some say they were 200 and 900 etc