Its leviOsa not levioSA

its leviOsa not levioSA

Attached: maxresdefault (1).jpg (1280x720, 102.85K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=FWtO0cfgewY
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

based potterposter, I see you

it's kiNO not KIno

If she would have corrected like that, embarrassed me like that in front of the whole class, I would have beat her to a bloody pulp. NEVER let a woman disrespect you in that manner. They need to be put in their place. Inshallah.

youtube.com/watch?v=FWtO0cfgewY

For me? It’s Hermione year 4

0h ya hermione? CRUCIIIO! CRRRUUUCIOO! am i sayin it right? CRUCIO!

dude wtf is wrong with you.

Have sex

It's self-partnered, not femcel

Based

>that nigger in the background having trouble

isn't this pointless when wizards can use spells without even speaking aloud?

Thanks hermione, you're a good friend and very cute.

"No!" shouted Ron calmly while stretching his legs

no, it's KIno.
t. german

based

I think it's like DBZ where they can do energy blasts while yelling, but those aren't as powerful as names attacks.

Only skilled wizards can cast without speaking aloud.
They attempt to learn it in the later books but it seems to be a pain in the arse, especially since most adult wizards still shout out their spells.

Dumbledore and Voldemort casted silently a lot.

HARRY YOU FUCKING JEW DID YOU PUT YOUR NAME IN THE GOBLET OF FIRE?

Attached: calmly.png (830x664, 592.31K)

I feel her to be honest. Red Letter Media does this shit all the time. Saying "the FORCE awakens" instead of "the force AWAKENS" and shit like that. They do it so regularly but it is hard to distinguish the pattern. I don't know why they do it. Mike does it the most. Shit drives me crazy.

>"It's Summers Eve foaming spray, not walk around with a rotting sardine in your panties all day. God, Hermionne. You're so gross."

Guten tag mehmet

For me it's year one

HARRY, IF I FIND OUT YOU PUT YOUR NAME IN THE GOBLET OF FIRE I'M GOING TO HAVE HAGRID CRUCIO YOUR FORESKIN OFF he said calmly

It's the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises, not an actual quality series. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though

"No!"

The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: 1573943937223.jpg (1601x2886, 3.13M)

Shit

Based, in the name of Muhammad (PBUH)

>shouts calmly

Stop being Islamophobic that is NOT OKAY

Ron! Stop!