ITT filmmakers you outgrew

Attached: 0_Quentin-Tarantino.jpg (1200x900, 119.44K)

Other urls found in this thread:

uproxx.com/filmdrunk/bill-murray-had-to-protect-wes-anderson-from-gene-hackman/
youtube.com/watch?v=RPM5T0QOs3Q
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Reminds me of that dumb interview where Tarantino said that he “outgrew” Godard lmao

OUATIH is unironically his best movie

Attached: 2D6BF7B1-BDBC-490F-A79B-9AFDB75BBF55.jpg (678x960, 65.95K)

Of course but we're not film-makers giving an interview

Attached: Kevin Smith.jpg (700x1000, 263.7K)

Yeah. But my point is that Tarantino’s film are more “juvenile” than Godard’s

Based
Me too. It's like he had no self awareness. He was talking about himself. It's also ironic considering the late Godard's output.

This. The vibe I get, it's as if he's the best student filmmaker ever that somehow gets massive budgets. He's ambitious and his films are always an event. But the storytelling is always so spoonfed and flawed. Basic technical mistakes in every movie. He makes the best poorly made films ever.

All the obvious bad ones like tarantino, nolan, fincher, this god awful manchild.
Instead in between my black and white movies I enjoy some choice picks from michael bay.

Unfortunately yea. He just never evolved

>he makes the best poorly made films ever

Perfect way of putting it although HACK would have sufficed

Attached: 1587777993205m.jpg (873x1024, 157.88K)

Baysed

> Shoots all his new films on a iphone

Attached: Steven soderbergh.jpg (600x900, 72.71K)

The poster-boy for this thread topic

That's not how you spell Death Proof

It wasn't until I started watching anime that I realised what an absolute hack he is

Tarantino

Film

Legend

i agree, the sentimentality of age improves his work. I loved the Sharon Tate scenes and the remorseless shitting on the hippies. he still has no taste and is a disgusting foot fetishist but in this era I'll take what I can get.

correct, arguably the only Tarantino movie with soul

I'm currently watching Hostel II with the QT commentary on. I don't care for his movies but his enthusiasm for cinema is infectious.

y wouldn't you clean your glasses before a professional headshot

>Tarantino goes to the barber
>asks for the "Frasier"

Attached: 4chan.png (1200x886, 884.55K)

I'm so happy gene hackman bullied this dandy

Attached: gettyimages-937359078-1581514090.jpg (3000x2000, 1.03M)

Schizopolis is still one of my go-to comedies. Fight me.

Everything after Clerks II, yes. And even his "classic movies" are cringe in hindsight.

>Tarantino goes to the barber
>asks for the "Final Cut"

Funny story, I bumped into him at a bakery a long time ago. I told him I loved him in Phantasm and asked if he kept in touch with Reggie Bannister and how he was doing. I also asked him if he was ever gonna work with Don Coscawhatever again. He just glared at me and stomped out, didn't even pick up his order.

Saw him on tv a bit later and he had gotten a haircut. Weird.

Attached: shutterstock_8864028fg.jpg (780x624, 93.08K)

Attached: 76546765.jpg (258x245, 12.45K)

Story? I always love Based Hackman

Disagree. So unlike Taratino.

Tarantino. Smith. Lynch. The holy trinity of overrated hacks.

For real...... the new jay and silent bob was terrible.

Explain please

he do be looking kinda fresh doe

manson did nothing wrong. striking fear into the hollywood degenerates of the late 60s and letting them know they weren't invincible is utterly based, as is confounding authorities with his 400IQ wordplay. literally my hero and i'll say this to people i meet regularly

Gene Hackman called Wes Anderson a c*nt, and once told him to “pull up his pants and act like a man.”

>Gene threatened to kill me today.’ Kill you? You’re in the union, he can’t kill you. Gene threatened to set fire to all of us.

uproxx.com/filmdrunk/bill-murray-had-to-protect-wes-anderson-from-gene-hackman/

Attached: download (33).jpg (800x800, 108.3K)

That's great. Reminds me of when Burt Reynolds got pissed off at PTA during filming of Boogie Nights. Two based and bitter old actors owning some talented but smug auteurs.

damn, Weinstein fucked THAT?!

probably because i like it so much

or Brando and Coppola on Apocalypse Now

Clerks is kino. Everything else is derivative shit.

>wes anderson
>talented

Attached: 1579480089908.jpg (376x471, 31.29K)

It would've been Kino if he kept the original ending.
youtube.com/watch?v=RPM5T0QOs3Q

Mate I outgrew cinema itself. It is an adolescent medium. You are watching something which is an adaptation from an original source, be that script or book. Literature is the real deal adult medium. Cinema is great for capturing glimpses of meaning, but ultimately fails to give any conclusion meaning because films are meant to entertain first, bound by the constrictions of time, budget, and being a visual medium.

All filmmakers are making art that is simplified for the viewer. The best directors take complicated subject matter and making it simple and entertaining. They are bound by scene and narrative structure, as well as the things before mentioned.

The best work for filmmakers is their early work, since that is when their rebellious spirit is at its most raw, which is also its most adolescent. I have sympathy for directors who try to create their magnum opus, only to hit their head against the wall with the cinematic medium.

To be clear I still love cinema, but I've really digested it has more value to teenagers. Adults choose literature if they want to engage themselves in a real entertaining and philosphical endeavour.

>I outgrew Tarantino

Attached: d90.png (644x800, 13.04K)

too dark for a pre 9/11 new jersey