But how can a monkey write Shakespeare

>but how can a monkey write Shakespeare

Attached: Joe.jpg (750x369, 35.21K)

Other urls found in this thread:

infinitemonkeylab.com/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

ask darwin.

Ask a black Israelite.

>Wouldn't they just smash the typewriters and get shit in the keys?
>Well it's more an abstract statement about probability than-
>Jamie pull up that video of the monkey flinging shit

>have you heard of the stoned ape theory?

>well you see joe it's really quite simple, if you they just randomly smash the keys and you have enough of them, eventually they will have recreated the works of Shakespeare through sheer chance
>Jaimie pull up that picture of a lion killer chimp. Jesus that thing must be what, 400lbs. He'd smash a typewriter to pieces

it is all a mind fuck anyway because humans are monkeys, and shakespear is best read in its original klingon.

>...but it's a cat in a box, it's either alive OR dead, right?

Attached: joe-rogan-forced-the-new-york-times-into-retracting-an-inaccurate-conor-mcgregor-tweet.jpg (1200x630, 93.97K)

I wish scientists would put a few well protected, bolted in place I pads with a text tool always on screen and see over a year, 2 or whatever what a group of monkeys randomly tapping the screen would yield.

Itd be interesting to see what words and if sentences appear.

I know you're a Hollywood producer fishing for scripts, you prick.

I agree with Joe on this one. A monkey could never write up the entire works of shakespeare even with an infinite amount of time. It's just a baseless thought experiment.

checked... user, are you perhaps, a pleasure model?

there is a big chance that experiment has already been done or is being done right now.

shakespeare himself was a monkey

or they could just use typewriters you zoomer faggot

>thinking 2 years would result to anything

>No. You're fucking with me. How could repeating 0.999 ever be the same as 1? Jaimie pull this up. The problem with saying things like this is when somebody like you says something stupid it automatically makes me doubt everything else you say.

I want Joe Rogan vs Monty Hall, has anyone brought it up to him?

>but C technically does have more liquid that A and B

Attached: Piaget’s+Conservation+Task[1].jpg (960x720, 38.74K)

here's a site that's been testing this, so far the best they've gotten is 12 characters

infinitemonkeylab.com/

I think I'd have a stroke listening to somebody trying to explain it to joe, especially if he didn't tell him what it was called. The comment section would give me another stroke.

Then you're as stupid as he is.
I N F I N I T Y!

The real question is: could an infinite number of Shakespeares write the entire life's work of a monkey with a typewriter?

so why does he keep mentioning monkeys and quake randomly?

No hurry. We've got infinity to go.

it is that or kettle bells and elk.

how can a monkey host a successful podcast?

>of course it's gonna be 1 in 2. There are only two boxes with golden balls

Attached: 1 rcjlb3CeIUak4Eqm5GD01A.png (1279x721, 949.72K)

Attached: 1586631948232.jpg (634x581, 61.79K)

The monkey fallacy has been disproved by the existence of the internet a thousand times over by now.

don't you think they'd get something shorter first like some poem rather than everything shakespeare ever wrote

it assumes the monkey will thrash randomly but it won't, it will have patterns that prevent it ever being coherent enough, it doesnt matter if it does it for ever.

What does “more” mean in this context

It's absolute cringe to think given any amount of time a chimp could write any piece of fiction or essay just by hitting the keys randomly. There's a website that makes random images and you could hit it until the heat death of the universe before you get anything that isn't random noise. Much less some futa hyper ball pokemon drawing from e621. It could take a million years to type the first word of hamlet but it wouldn't be any closer to writing it than it was a million years ago. It's just cringe pseudo philosophy. Joe Rogan is right here, you are all pseuds.