This makes perfect sense. I wonder why Nolan didn't include it in his movies?

batman and superman's justifications for never killing were always pretty shallow, and were only there to make the comics more kid friendly

Said Batman from the safety of his private military base, where nobody can harm him, as he looked down at the masses, who live in the slums of Gotham city, for whom super-villain attacks are a fact of life. "Like ants" thought Master Bruce as he stared at the teaming mass of humanity as they swarmed across the screen of his supercomputer, "like tiny little ants."

Batman's philosophy could make sense in a world where the justice system actually fucking worked. Who the fuck is in charge of the prisons and Arkham?

He's got my vote!

Attached: 1475991657318.jpg (376x302, 30.65K)

>batman fleeing police in Begins drops explosives that flip over cop cars
He could very easily have gotten someone killed there.
Of course Batman's real reason for keeping his vigilantism under control is that he needs the help of Jim Gordon who is willing to look the other way and bend the rules but would have to come down hard if Batman killed people intentionally.

Attached: f08fcb65ec8c2f5f940969f812c96ee2-imagejpeg.jpg (230x219, 4.71K)

"If you kill a nigger, the number of niggers in the world decreases by one." - Donald Trump

and so that the villains always come back

incredibly dumb statement. just kill more than 1 killer and this no longer is an issue.

>putting down a dangerous killer so he wont hurt more people in the future
>literally just as bad as killing an innocent person for fun

Comic books are for children. How can anyone above the age of 12 think this is deep

soonly kill 2 or more killers duh

What? He had a no kill rule, he doesn't need to directly quote... whatever writer wrote this for Batman, who is not a real person lol

But "killing" isn't an inherently bad thing, murder is. And killing murderers is not murder, it is execution for the sake of humanity. Justified killings are important, and should happen more often to the evil and criminal as threat of death is the best deterrant to crime.

>Europe
Socrates, Platon, Descartes, Spinoza, Kant
>USA
if yuo kill bad man you are bad mann
t. le comic guy

Why do we tolerate those subhuman mutts and their cencerous pseudo-culture?

Attached: 1580684511307.jpg (1200x851, 115.42K)

It's only a comic book, it's hardly reflective of the USA as a whole.

If Bruce Wayne had run for office and give his millions for the city to build more schools it would had done more than dressing as superhero

Even a comic book is too much for an average amerigoblin

if every killer killed two killers then there would be less killers in the world

That's a bit dismissive, the USA has had quite an impact on world culture, despite the fact that it's only been around for about 250 years.

>But "killing" isn't an inherently bad thing, murder is
Yes, killing isn't even against the Abrahamic law. Thou shalt not Kill was a medieval reinterpretation to create a world full of superstitious, penitent rich guy who would do the will of the church. The original verb is hebrew "ratsah", which means to murder, not to kill. there is no prohibition on killing justly, and killing a murderer is hardly unjust.

Not true if you kill more than 1 killer

So if you kill another killer, then it goes down by 1. So really, we can't expect God to do all of the work then.

not if you were already a killer before that...