SAY MY NAME

SAY MY NAME

Attached: lucas.png (429x552, 397.24K)

Other urls found in this thread:

vice.com/read/camille-paglia-believes-that-revenge-of-the-sith-is-our-generations-greatest-work-of-art
newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/what-the-seven-star-wars-films-reveal-about-george-lucas
youtube.com/watch?v=Ibkmh72_1pw
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

DJ KHALED

LLLLLLL-L-L-L-L-L-L--L--LLL--LLL-LLL---LUUUU.....

Fuck off, eh?

louder

Attached: 1581196710054.jpg (479x640, 19.94K)

SEPHIROT

Mike Stoklasa

H-Hayai

Willy Wonka?

maybe he would if you stopped choking him for just one fucking minute

The Prequels are better

Fuck off George, you can’t write jackshit for a script

You're George Lucas.

Attached: 1418248104757.jpg (576x324, 39.73K)

お前の名はジョージ・ルーカスのだ

I'm glad people have come around to the pequels

Only the prequel zoomers because they don't understand that liking something doesn't make it good.

Wat

this ain't some primary school play boy, this is film

This. Like the sequels.

ANOTHA ONE

Lucas sold everything to Disney for a loss as one giant "fuck you" to fans sick of him remastering the OT. Let us not forget that fact.

Prequels are still dogshit even compared to the sequel trilogy

Attached: stoklasa.jpg (663x579, 112.29K)

SNEED

Hehe, he do funny voice

Does hating something make it bad?

It's not surprising that the same people who attack the prequels are always unversed in real film or anything artistic, and that the people who praise the prequels (Zizek, Paglia, Brody, etc) are always literate, educated, and versed in real film.

vice.com/read/camille-paglia-believes-that-revenge-of-the-sith-is-our-generations-greatest-work-of-art
newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/what-the-seven-star-wars-films-reveal-about-george-lucas
youtube.com/watch?v=Ibkmh72_1pw

The fact that everyone points to Plinkett as the authority on why the prequels are bad speaks volumes. Mike Stoklasa is one of the least artistic people on the planet - he can't process movies outside of the conventions of Hollywood films, his approach to narrative is tempered with the same surface-level requisites listed on tvtropes.

Any complaint that people have about the prequels illustrates a weak grasp on film. How many art films would they claim has 'too much sitting and talking'? They would watch the end of Breaking the Waves and whine about dated CGI. Their sensibilities for 'good dialogue' in what is intentionally pulp comes from bad pulp, ie, the original Star Wars, the only pulp they've ever seen. They would similarly view any homage-driven art film and miss the entire point.

Lucas' only mistake in the prequels was doing something daring, original, artistic and literate, not realizing that the manchildren conditioned by the original SW trilogy to loathe anything cerebral would lash out against his cinematic risks.

George? More like, "my bucci is encorged"

isnt george lucas himself pretty short already???
how fucking short is jj?

>Believing a Gen-X'er to begin with...

Attached: Carlostickled.jpg (1280x720, 328.46K)

Keep seething,Prequels will be praised even more later