>movie about dreams
>is fucking terrible at depicting dreams
bravo nolan
Movie about dreams
>movie about dreams
>no cute girl who flirts with you and says she wants to marry you and then you wake up before you have sex
Do americans only dream about new york city and buildings?
watch Paprika
>you wake up still in love with her but you can't even remember what she looked like
>you wake up still in love with her and you remember exactly what she looked like and know that nothing in real life will ever give you that feel again
>movie came out 10 years ago
>still filters and makes midwits seethe
>meanwhile brainletchads and high IQs are content with it
only retards thinks enjoying a film has anything to do with intelligence.
>have a really realistic dream
>think about it after I wake up
>remember it some time later, but forget that it was a dream
>now plagued by false memories
I can't tell what's real anymore. Did I really have extremely guilty sex with a relative, and then have to hide a dead body with people somehow looking exactly where I hid it before falling off a cliff? Was it just a dream? I'll never know.
>good OST
>good visuals
>good first half
>terrible action scenes
>terrible pacing
>nolan doesn't know how to tell zimmer to shut the fuck up after a certain point
but i had a dream just like inception
except the crew and I were all little kids and also there was time travel, it was too deep for you though
>enjoying a film has anything to do with intelligence.
It most definitely does when the viewer is stupid enough not to grasp a very basic plot, so you are wrong.
No dream scene in a film will ever compare to Karras' dream of his mother in The Exorcist
>movie about dreams
>has the colour palette of wet concrete
>train through the street, wow so imaginative
Bravo colourblind auteur Nolan. Bravoo. Great cinematography
The writer/director is British
>Terrible action scenes
Midwit opinion.
Not him but Nolan can't shoot action scene to save his life.
>Make a movie about dreams
>Explore the concept of dreams being mistaken for reality with a meta-narrative about film viewing experience being similar dreaming
>Brainlets trying to sound smart whine about lack of surreal imagery
Bro, dreams are totes like acid trips bro. We have infinite capacity for imagination bro, have you like wondered what it would be like to use 100% of our brains bro? Totally wasted opportunity by Inception bro.
>good first half
You mean where they spend an hour and 20 minutes explaining how the rules work?
Inception is not about dreams you dumb fucks, it's about creating such real world like dream settings that you can implant a thought/idea into someone.
The very idea of the dreams in the film is to be as real as possible
His action scenes are great. Only H2H combat choreography is an issue which they by passed in the one instance they had it in Inception anyway.
Not really the choreography is clumsy as hell and the scenes have no sense of rhytm or weight. The scene in TDKR with the crowds running against each other is laughable.
Honestly though, Nolan gave himself an opportunity to put anything he wanted in this film and it would still make sense and fit into the world he established.
There's even a bit where Tom Hardy sees JGL shooting with a shitty little handgun and says "you need to dream a little bigger" before pulling out a grenade launcher...
WHY NOT A DREAM UP A FUCKING RAILGUN OR SOME SHIT
best movie about dreams/nightmares is mulholland drive
>city folds in half
>train crashes through city
>entire world spins around
Don't they even say in the movie that dreams feel real when you're having one?
This.
It actually feels like someone downloaded a weird dream they had onto a usb stick and turned it into a movie
Lynch knows how dreams operate, you can see it from his editing the best. That sudden change of in-dream environment, yet you as the character accept it as reality.
>Not really the choreography is clumsy as hell and the scenes have no sense of rhytm or weight.
Opposite of it true. If anything Nolan excels at trying to tell a story within an action sequence. You sound like you're throwing out criticisms you read online.
>The scene in TDKR with the crowds running against each other is laughable.
Watch some of vids of HK protesters doing that against the riot police.
They also say don't bend the physics too much or else the dreams collapse. It was clearly laid out in the very scene the city is folded in half.
It wouldn't and most importantly that's not what the film is about thematically. This obsession over surreal imagery is weird, almost childish. We have that in almost any sci-fi about dreams or ones that want to show off their "creativity".
goddamn it, you always wake up before sex. Why brain, why?
>online criticisms are not valid because they online
Yes. Correct.
That comparison makes no sense. HK protestors may throw themselves at the police but in the film one side has guns and they both run into each other like they are doing some football brawl.
>Yes. Correct.
Maybe you didn't read properly. I am accusing you of parroting criticisms without understanding them.
As for TDKR watch the scene again. Both sides have guns, the police are gunned down in scores until they get closer.
Yes your accusation is stupid. Criticizing Nolan's films is not really a hard work considering he is inept visual director. Deflecting by muh you just read it and you don't understand it, doesn't mean much.
One side has automic rifles the other handguns. The scene is stupid. Like 10 cops are shot and then they start fisfighting with quite comical results. Lemonade Joe, small czechoslovak film from 1964, has better crowd fight scenes than this.
This was my biggest problem with inception (I have many), its supposedly about dreams but it looks and feels like a sterile action film and all the "surreal" elements are just standard blockbuster special effects.
There's not even any sex.
Because it's too alien of an experience that your brain can't even compute it for a dream.