What’s the point of having children then?

What’s the point of having children then?

Attached: 7A08474E-7961-4C25-944B-72F644467B94.jpg (828x848, 334.71K)

First Emma and her car now this

Why are these fucking celebrities so stubborn. Is it really so hard to apologise? Or leave something for your own flesh and blood??? What the fuck?!

why does it concern you, incel?

>I think inheritance is quite distasteful
I'm sure he felt that way when his parents kicked the bucket too, yep. Fucking boomers. What's he doing with it instead?

Soft times create weak men. Daniel knows this. One day his kids will thank him, I'm sure. If you have to work for it, money is worth twice as much.

His wealth is unearned so I respect him for that decision. Actors are all coddled and overpaid babies. If he were a professional or an entrepreneur then I'd say otherwise.

extremely based

>Net worth over $130 million
Who is he planning on giving his estate to?

>be kid of famous dad
>have empty childhood because Dad is never home
>is overshadowed by your dad in everyway
>know your mom sucked Jewish dick at one point or another
>"b-but at least I'm rich r-right?"
>NO
>dad leaves you nothing
>have to take studies seriously now
>land a 50k job
>life is miserable, live in a shitty apartment when you grew up in a mansion
>some user on the internet tells you you actually earn 6 figures because you wagecucked like a good boy
>all of that so your dad could make the headlines with a shock statement

Imagine being Craig's son right now

Attached: 1581892415043.jpg (511x559, 73.4K)

he prefers the council, government and queen to take everything instead

If you had stopped after 'decision' it would've been funny and true. Now it's whiny and true.

what a cunt

His kids probably kept asking to watch the good James Bond movies instead of his

>imblyign the kid of celeb doesn't automatically become a celeb

You will still have an enormous advantage over plebs.

I can understand raising them so they aren't as coddled as hell and making them work for what they have but I doubt I'd go this far.

Admitting to being a bad parent and not understanding familial loyalty is endemic to the modern virtue-signalling phenotype.

There is a reason why in Rome, actors were considered to be socially equal to prostitutes, right above the slaves.

Jews and brown people, because he needs that one last little dopamine hit.

yes give your millions to some scam organization instead? sounds much better idea

I always get a laugh at Yas Forums seething over the thought of a famous celeb not handing out hundreds of millions to the children, like it was some kind of a personal slight to them.

I can't remember who said it, but some rich person said they'd leave their kids enough to do anything, but not enough to do nothing. That seems better than leaving your kids nothing at all.

Pretty sure that was Bill Gates. $10 million is better than nothing I guess.

I find stuff like this disgusting. Your child should be given every advantage possible. Literally ENSURING your offspring has a lower quality of life so you can get 2-3 headlines and be on a list somewhere. Jesus Christ man.

Why even raise your kids then, Dan? Why pay for education or whatever, if it isn't earned? Just throw them a stick and toss em to the wild to fend for themselves

Reminds me of my Pa. He gave me a bag of sand one christmas.

>Literally ENSURING your offspring has a lower quality of life so you can get 2-3 headlines and be on a list somewhere

Yeah, I'm sure someone who was brought up by millionaire parents and got the best education money can buy are going to have it so rough. Far better to let the kids grow up entitled to their parent's money and be spoiled assholes.

A stick? In todays economy? In my day we had to go out and get our own sticks. Being an acto isn't easy, you know.

How do you earn to inherit millions of dollars? Just because the condom broke one night doesn't cut it.

As someone who lost out on millions and billions of inherence from crafty cucks who stole it I gotta say fuck this moron

>billions
Yeah right

The kids grow up in a rich neighborhood, go to good schools, and have unlimited access to quality nutrition. They will make connections in their communities that will take them further than any amount of work or any degree would. Even if they made no connections on their own, their father's name will get them through life. They've got plenty of handouts without recieving a single cent from their parents.

Bit distasteful to think that if you’re a famous actor to expect your kids to achieve in the same position as you.

Yeah, leaving all your property to the government will surely help

You can raise good kids and not gimp their future. It's called being a good parent and doing actual parenting.

>crafty cucks
Sounds like you're the one who got cucked

>right-wing Yas Forumstards revealed to actually be whining babies wanting parental handouts

l m a o i n g

How do you earn a gift?
The question is, what kind of father does not give his children gifts?

The kind who does not love them. This is essentially the liberal in a nutshell.

Their dad's an actor, not the president

I'm not other user but I feel like his point was like, if you're going to have kids why wouldn't you make as much an effort as possible to ensure that they live a comfortable life? Of course wealth and status can turn people into selfish cunts, but that could be prevented by decent parenting. Personally I feel uncomfortable with the idea of having children because I don't want to bring another living breathing human being into a world full of stresses and looming threats like war or disease etc. If I knew for a certainty that my kid wouldn't undergo any significant harm I'd have kids without thinking twice. NOT doing as much as you possibly can to make their life easier increases the chance that they'll be subjected to pain and hurt that, yes, millions of other people experience daily, but which are still nonetheless extremely undesirable to undergo

That sort of besmirches the name of whores, they're whores but they still put in some good solid work (well, sort of, it's not as if it's not an easy job)

Family owned alot of natural gas and land in Africa lost out millions upon billions missed out on patents for glue and other shit
Now I'm a virgincel neet who lives off the dole and suchs on mommies milkers as she's my gf so I'm basically rich in spirit
Happened before I was alive dumbfuck

>Seething that people have the principled stance to protect the concept of generational wealth

Now I see why leftists simply sold their country's future to brown people. You all low-key hate your children.

Is everyone who says something you disagree on this site, Yas Forums and right wing?

Well somebody is going to inherit his wealth when he dies, it doesn't just disappear. Maybe he wants to to go to the government when he dies so it can fund more wars for Israel.

Attached: 41DD8FB8-A46A-473E-8BD6-138B18C5CDCD.jpg (379x361, 29.7K)

Inheritance should be capped at 5 millions. After that all money should to the the local nazi party or burned.

those poor kids. instead of getting 30 million for free they'll have to make due with only 2 million

The entire purpose of children is to store your wealth once you're dead

Inheritance is a birthright, there's no "earning" involved. The idea is that a family loyal to each other can accrue wealth over time so their descendants can rise to a higher class than they were in life
You can't just denounce the entire concept because your parents/grandparents are screw ups who left you with nothing

>>right-wing Yas Forumstards revealed to actually be whining babies wanting parental handouts
>l m a o i n g
I've always been a stout centrist
I want a black Asian gf with huge milkers and bleach them while getting gibs and not having to work while being racist

Attached: 504-150_bethan_l1.jpg (404x599, 65.59K)