Yas Forums thinks Star Wars prequels are good but shit on the Hobbit trilogy

It's a testament to degradation of film quality over the past few decades and proof of its continuing decline. The boomers hated the prequels. The generation that follows the zoomers will love the hobbit.

What?

>terrible ending though
they should have replaced that contrived bullshit to drown the dragon in gold with the opening scene of the third movie

Your opinion is retarded and Hollywood has been pumping garbage year after year for a century now
There is no degradation, everything was always shit, the truly great films you hold so high are complete utter rarities.

It's comfy weekend viewing but got fuck all on the prequels

Literally no one thinks the prequels are good, this is the least epic meme on this board

We get it man, you saw A new hope when you were 15

We get it, you saw A Phantom Menace when you were 5. In 2008.

>>Yas Forums thinks Star Wars prequels are good b
topkek
>1: Painfully Cringe
are you dense?

1. Good old fashioned contrarianism
2. The prequels are now in the 20 year nostalgia zone. People who grew up with them are now grown up and feel a shit-ton of attachment and affection for them (despite their flaws). Hobbit won't be anywhere near that for another 10 years although Lord of the Rings is now in that zone.
3. Considering the sequel trilogy the prequels seem less bad in retrospect
4. There are some interesting aspects of the prequels despite their issues
5. The prequels got better with each installment and some people unironically love Revenge of the Sith. Hobbit completely shit the bed with Battle of the 5 armies and makes the prior two films worse by its existence. Sith meanwhile helps Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones by existing (although that's still dependent on how much one likes Revenge of the Sith)

No, when it was released

AUJ and its theme of longing for home is the only movie with an emotional core of the 6

>>Yas Forums thinks Star Wars prequels are good

Attached: imagine all the people.jpg (911x728, 132.03K)

Star Wars was always shit, Lord of the Rings was mostly good to very good, the Hobbit took everything good about LotR and did the exact opposite.
It should have been one single 3h movie following Fellowship, one of the high points of modern cinema, as a blueprint as they tell a similar story.

In 2012 for the 3D rerelease? That's later than most people but good for you.

Kys rlm

Weta digital was the main issue with the Hobbit movies. It's just too noticeably bad.

t. coping millenial

The main issue with the Hobbit was the entire production process.
It was treated as a product rather than art thus we ended up with a focus tested consumer product.

It's like going on the same journey again but there's no reason to do it

The prequels are shit films but the world created within them, both in terms of the lore and visual design is incredibly interesting, perhaps even more so than the OT. Theres lots of great tie in material that explores it all better too. i think a lot of people that say they like the prequels really just like the era. Also has a great sountrack. People mock some of the effects nowadays but lucasfilm was really pushing the boundaries of what was possible at the the time.
The hobbit trilogy is just shit in all regards.only thing it got right was the casting

Dilate.

K I N O
youtube.com/watch?v=Pyy_FIYE7EE

Seethe harder.

Make more cringy videos

F U N
youtube.com/watch?v=PrJx6SzqD4w

Cope zoomer. The prequels will never be considered good movies except for those with nostalgia ridden zoomer brains.

give it ten years, you'll see the nuzoomers that weren't even alive when they came out re-writing history and claiming we all loved these movies until a youtuber told us not to. yes, you will still be here in ten years, we all will

For me, it's their terrible argument that the sequels are bad don't make the prequels good

the prequels are bad and the sequels are bad, for different reasons, but they're both still bad.