Which trilogy was worse

which trilogy was worse

Attached: star-wars-prequels-hobbit-trilogy-slice-600x200.jpg (600x200, 50.59K)

Hobbit.

>worse
>posts prequels

does not compute

hobbit and it's not even close, and that doesn't mean the prequels aren't really flawed

Both are terrible but at least TH has likable characters.

At least both are better than their predecessors

Hobbit is completely soulless in its shittiness. At least the prequels were fascinating in their horribleness.

it's weird that the PT has better CGI than the Hobbit

this

a better question would are the sequels or the hobbits worse, which is a much better question but i actually think im going to have to go with the hobbits still

AUJ was the best of the 6. But Battle of 5 Armies was probably the worst. Not sure if it even qualifies as a movie.

You. I like you. Guaranteed replies.

Are you shitting me? The PT was better just on the memes alone.

on the other end of the spectrum, LOTR and the OT star wars arent the best trilogies
sure, they're good
but they pale in comparison to PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN FUCKER
BEST TRILOGY OF ALL TIME DONT EVEN REPLY

.

Attached: legolas_hobbit_jumping_stones_absurd.webm (1280x580, 2.65M)

based, first pirates movie is pure kino

Revenge of the Sith actually redeems the prequel trilogy in my eyes while The Hobbit just gets worse and worse with each passing moment

arent the elves described to be extremely light footed, like they wouldn't even sink down in snow when they walked on it
i mean it looks stupid but wouldn't it be possible knowing that

unwatchable garbage. even fan edits can't salvage it unless they cut it down to the same scope it had in the book.

people usually dismiss it when talking about trilogies, not realizing that all 3 movies have very intertwined stories and its just so fucking high quality action adventure KINO

the prequels was mishandled treasure, the hobbits were just trash.

it's just too mary sue-ish

Pirates 1 was kino but 2 and 3 were a mess, amazing Davy Jones CGI notwithstanding.

Attached: davy-jones.jpg (2048x1148, 810.66K)

In what way is this worse than him jumping around on a fucking giant elephant and luckshot sniping enemies in impossible situations?

what were they thinking?

Davy Jones and the T-1000 are still the best CGI visual effects in cinema

The elephant climbing could sort of be explained by saying they're really strong arrows embedded in thick hide
Still not as absurd as jumping across objects that are in free fall

1 is pretty fantastic, the biggest fault of 2 and 3 is being a tiny bit too cheesy, but 3 is still my favorite even though i know film science wise 1 is better
the entire maelström sequence is ten out of ten, its fucking amazing
also davy being one of the best villains in all of cinema

This is comically bad

Pirates 2 and 3 should have been boiled down into one long-ass movie. 2 is particularly bad about this, they started filming it from storyboards without a script so huge parts of it are just pointless cavalcade of set-pieces. theres a stage of it between "we gotta go get Jack!" and "we got Jack!" where nothing of any note happens for LITERALLY over an hour.

it isnt but LOTR has many good parts to offset the crap, while battle of five armies was filled with nonsense

Hobbit by far.

SW:OT = LOTR > SW:PT >> Hobbit >>> SW:ST

>meanwhile in fellowship

Attached: l6zzjc00kvb21.jpg (960x540, 43.48K)

you know elves are magical n sheeit?

star wars. by far.

well the prequels were actually good and the hobbit trilogy was total dogshit so