Reminder that no matter how bad the sequels were these movies are still awful, dated garbage with wooden acting...

You become elderly when you turn 35, so Gen X fags are also gramps

Seeing as how you did nothing to refute my point I'd say it's you shitposting. Don't worry Yas Forums will be here when you grow up

The video game graphics look especially bad on modern TVs. The prequel trilogy has a good plot and themes and could be remade amazingly. Maybe someday we will see the fall of Anakin told well

Hopefully. I do not hate George and I like elements of his vision but I think he should have just been a producer/ worked on the rough draft of the screenplay.

>Maybe someday we will see the fall of Anakin told well
You saw it already.

Attached: 1579990436191.jpg (1073x1431, 685.5K)

Googoo gaagaa but at least my baby yoda and baby clone wars shows are kool, right? Waa a bub boo

>the special effects aren't realistic, that means the movie is bad

Attached: npc.png (636x773, 13.88K)

He didn't say they weren't realities he said that they looked like something from an old video game and therefore bad. Retard

no but like with a good actor. and in a good movie lol

>the special effects look like something from an old video game, that means it's a bad movie

>the movie is good even though it looks like garbage

Attached: tard.jpg (213x237, 9.21K)

You didn't say it looked like garbage, you said it looked like an old video game

Based smoothbrain

So much this! Twin Peaks is also awful, dated garbage with wooden acting.

>Yes even Episode III it's only good as a meme factory.
bruh you posted reddit

I didn't say shit retard I was agreeing with the dude that said it. And yes a movie with cgi that looks like it belongs on a ps2 game is a movie that looks like shit maybe if you weren't a brainless you would understand that.

>you must be from another site if you don't have the same opinion as me
lol brainlet

The prequels are shit but the sequels are some of the worst high budget movies ever made.

>it looks bad because, it looks bad
Why do so many retards have a problem with movies not looking realistic?

youtube.com/watch?v=D_TWqFOruwQ

Take your own advice mousecuck

what's up with Padme's pregnancy?

She reveals her pregnancy at the beginning of the movie. Then she gives birth at the end of the movie. Humans take 9 months to gestate. But did the movie last 9 months long? It was only a few days at most. We see the transitions from day to night a few times and there's pretty brisk action throughout. Do Star Wars humans gestate in a few days? Could you take it raw on Friday night then pop out a couple twins on Tuesday?

Star Wars takes place a long time ago in a galaxy far away. There are no humans in the film

*films

Holy shit OP is getting btfo in his own thread lmao

>t. RLM faggot
The movies genuinely made money at the box office. Merchandising made Lucas even richer. There was still a demand for more Star Wars movies after the prequels ended.. The prequels cannot be considered bad at all when the franchise thrived.

Disney killed Star Wars. The Plinkett reviews were a hatchet job. These are the facts. Deal with it, bitch.

>Reminder that no matter how bad the sequels were these movies are still awful, dated garbage with wooden acting. Yes even Episode III it's only good as a meme factory.

Attached: 1573099375324.jpg (665x800, 156.98K)

Tard I literally never said the words unrealistic, learn to read. I said bad. I have no problem with movies that look unrealistic, I have a problem with movies that look like dated sterile shit.

>it made a lot of money, that means it's good
I love the prequels, but this logic is very flawed

if it looks like a human, talks like a human, and smells like a human then it's a human

You must think that the transformers movies are masterpieces then retard lmao