Has she ever been in a good movie?

has she ever been in a good movie?
harry potters are crap not even counting those

Attached: emma watson car2.jpg (512x640, 100.76K)

is that THE car

>harry potters are crap not even counting those
>has she ever been in a good movie
>not counting good movies

dumb car bitch

She's been in my movie, if you know what I mean

she won't apologize, don't even ask her to

Imagine sniffing her pussy and ass. how much money would you pay for a good whiff? Me? 78 dollars

Harry Potter isn’t good

what's her endgame?

BIG

When will she apologise bros?

I'm sorry for you being wrong.

EMISSIONS

"No!"

>perks of being a wallflower
>regression
>bling ring

Attached: 1585736944127.jpg (1200x1200, 83.75K)

the fucking bitch

HOWEVER

She could sit on my face and pleasure herself with my mouth, if you know what I means.

absolutely shameless, look at that fucking opulence

I would pay two months worth of rent to sniff her pussy and ass.

Attached: 12472568.jpg (682x960, 36.44K)

i'd buy that for a dollar

She saw Weinstein's mutilated genitals

No

She's been living off Harry Potter for her entire adult life

20 quid, maybe

Just say you're sorry! God dammit!

based
seething incels can't handle this

Has she ever been in anything besides the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: 61E40CBA-5412-4493-A42A-E89206CEF6CF.jpg (1601x2886, 3.13M)

>so that is an extra 300 points to griffindor for mr potter's actions, and another 100 point for my weasley's actions, putting griffindor in the lead
>every member of slytherin house looks horrified
>however...
>malfoy glances up, a faint glimmer of hope on his face
>however, it seems only fair to give slytherin a bonus too
>malfoy starts to smile
>indeed, I shall therefore award slytherin ten thousand extra points for each time miss grainger has apologised for her car

Attached: dumble.jpg (594x247, 23.94K)

if this isn't pasta kudos to you good sir

*reverses your anti-bait*

Attached: emmahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.jpg (1280x720, 245.82K)

I can give her a minor role in my upcoming film called Foot in Mouth. she'll have to do it for free though, considering I blew my budget(and load) hiring Sofia Boutella as the lead.

Attached: 1509130226802.jpg (3606x5409, 2.58M)