>The message was disregarded by manager
Aight ima tell you in my netflix copy the movie ends with the message coming up to the room 0. How the fuck do you know what happened afterwards?
If there was a fucking post-credit scene then I hate this movie.
It’s not even communism good tho. They try it and it pretty much instantly fails because there’s not enough to go round
Which is real neat for a metaphor.
Not so much a smart move when you bring up a pretty simple question for the narrative of the movie itself.
>ut EVEN IF the food is rashioned there still Is not enough
So you're telling me they can design a super intricate and meticulously crafted tunnel reaching hundreds of feet below ground, since its too tall to be a building, and also create a delivery device that goes off magnetism or advanced tech or fucking magic for all it matters, but they can't just, I dunno, look at how much people are in the thing when making the food? Like they can't actually just do a simple calculation for calories here? Wow yeah deep commentary on the system since you know they either volunteered or were chosen to go in there because of crime but amount of food correlation, that's outside their scope. Its not even some kind of corruption thing! They spent fuckloads on the food they send down, its some high quality stuff. They clearly are sending down stuff thats worth a lot so its not like they're taking the money out like a private prison would for its food.
But i mean its only the main plot, why ask questions like that.
Yo hol up guys.
Yes everyone will get their food on the menu and you can not store food in you room. Okay that doesn't sound capitalistic. But still the rations are made like one big ration therefore the top dogs eat the others doesnt - muh capitalism.
To make the communist idea work they had to use violence.
You know
...
When Don Quichote and Negro Panza go on the platform down.
During the middle of the movie the manager is shown with a penna cotta, identical to the one at the end of the movie. He sees a single hair in it and blames one of the cooks for letting a hair in. He probably assumes the dish was returned becuase of the hair showing his misunderstanding of the suffering below. The people at the top don't understand the message. Im sure this scene was the true ending of the film, and that the girl at the end was an illusion of metaphor for selflessness.
Yeh. Might be.
Still as I said I love to imagine the ending was literall and the girl got.splattered all over the room 0, just so the workers get the message - kids are dying from starvation, delete this shithole.
Based poltard
Here's a pretty big plothole with that.
>Its explicitly said they name their favorite food when they go in, and the chefs make that for them.
>Meaning that at minimum, there should be one dish for one person
Maybe rather than "Saying something" about how the people up top take what you love and all that, they should have left that tidbit out and not made the whole conflict not make sense. It literally only comes up like twice.
>but they can't just, I dunno, look at how much people are in the thing when making the food? Like they can't actually just do a simple calculation for calories here?
They can, and find that it isn't enough to feed the entire prison population.
>Meaning that at minimum, there should be one dish for one person
Only if there was enough of a supply in the first place, which there isn't. You're a retard.