Is this douche even a real lawyer? such a fucking hack
Is this douche even a real lawyer? such a fucking hack
Other urls found in this thread:
mobile.twitter.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
you just got mogged
Who is this? Looks like a fucking chad
I hate how this guy can't seem to distinguish between characters doing something illicit and the writers making a mistake.
>I hate how this guy can't seem to distinguish between characters doing something illicit and the writers making a mistake.
There was a really small youtuber with the same idea of looking at the legality of movie plot lines before LegalEagle.
>had some decent content
>reddit starts slurping his dick
>content becomes anti-trump stuff just to appeal to them
Smart move desu that's some easy money
>wants an audience of reddit
you feel threatened by a handsome successful chad
I think his videos on Suits are the worst ones. Obviously the show is wildly unrealistic, but he completely misses the conceit of the show, and in the case of Mike's trail, he completely ignores all context for the clip.
He complains that half the stuff that Mike and Harvey do would get them disbarred, when that's the entire point of the show...
he's never had a bout of "wrong-think" in his entire life
the point of HIS show is that he's treating everything as if it's a real life legal case. it's not a review
What the fuck?
Very dishonest youtuber
I mean if you're looking for a consistent consumer base of losers to watch your videos and generate some green for your wallet, then yeah leddit is pretty good.
That's a whole of lot of impulsive brainlets to consume your stuff
>implying you wouldn't accept the nomination for lord of the trannies if it came with a fat paycheck
He's relentlessly handsome. Imagine a threesome between him, Doctor Mike and (you).
In the case of Mike's Trial at the very least, he just completely ignores context and then says it's unrealistic.
Essentially, the witness is Mike's old roommate Trevor, who is established to the jury to have lived with Mike for years, specifically over the period he was supposed to be at law school. Trevor provides testimony that Mike never went to Harvard and overall, never tells a lie on the stand.
But the video of this D.J Stone used in the video doesn't show this context. It starts as the lawyer is cross-examining Trevor. And the entire time Stone is harping on at the clip and the lawyers present for not acting as they should, all because he was too lazy to actually find and watch the episode (or any of the series, he probably doesn't even know what the trial was all about). He instead probably just found a highly-viewed Suits clip on YouTube.
I'd rather live in a cardboard box then sell out to Reddit.
I had to unsubscribe to cinemasins because of this. Really fucking boring stuff they release these days. The nail in the coffin was home alone 2 for me
>pre 2014
>5-7 minute videos
>had good jokes
>no politics
>Post 2015
>17-20 minute videos
>no good jokes
>audible and book shilling to the max
>wants an audience of 4chang
>Watching cinemasins at all
yikes
This. He also assumes if you do something illegal, you will automatically get caught and punished. Kind of dumb for a supposed lawyer.
He's 5'6".
He's rich, successful and popular. You are none of these things and never will be.
how, and why, do you even know this?
I would sell out for Reddit in a heartbeat if it meant I could get a shit ton of money.
>manlet cope
Is he even jewish?
Imagine taking legal advice from a goy