Why this movie receive so much hate? it may not be scary, but it has a great unsettling feeling

by the people who say that the wich never appears, or there isn't any jump scares

>he forgets about the effectiveness of marketing in movies and the influence that follows
And no, the first found footage was cannibal holocaust.

It's just a guy peeing in a corner, what's so scary about this?

Never blame the people who started a trend, they usually made something good which is why everyone copied them.

Instead, blame the people who blatantly rip off the originals and the idiots who keep buying the imitation versions, they're the reason the trend persists.

Attached: 1488913196416.jpg (780x439, 79.65K)

Are you a zoomer, by chance, OP? This is one of the best horror movies ever made.

Almost every complaint I've heard is how you don't see anything and footage of nothing so pretty much all the hate is from fags who loved the mid 2000s jumpscare horror and hate horror movies you actually have to pay attention to

You are a dumb, simple faggot

I've never heard those complaints, but if you want a dumb movie like that there is the sequel/reboot.

Work on reading comprehension

i honestly haven't thought about this shit in years,
i suppose introspect,it was better than ''book of shadows'',what a heaping bucket of lame that was

i was disappointed more than anything, looking back, i would've at least showed some instance of the witch, if only for a split second,even if it was a cutout of Margeret Hamilton,it was the title character, for fuck sake, a bunch of drunk teenagers mooning about the woods, if i wanted to see that,i'd turn on TikTok

Attached: 7ad343f3e4886f0e988fafcd3743c9ee.jpg (1920x1080, 129.25K)

>It may not be scary
>so much hate
Dumb zoomer.

The ORIGINAL was better.

Attached: 1568388138195.webm (480x360, 2.67M)

Nah, I like the idea of never seeing the witch, it lends itself an increased air of mystery. If there had been previous movies where they had shown the witch then I agree, it would be stupid not to show her but here it is perfectly acceptable and probably the smart plan seeing as they had basically no budget.

You're blinded by nostalgia it's not that scary it's more unsettling and leaves you with an empty feeling and it has gained some fags who hate on it now pleas cut down on buzzwords

It aged like shit. Found footage film was exciting at the time but if you re-watch it now it really is a movie about 3 teens getting lost in the forest. There's some interesting scenes, like the tent scare or when they find the house but it's otherwise quite boring.

The reason it was a good movie is because it is left ambiguous if anything supernatural was happening at all, or if it was some kids who got lost and disoriented. God damn.

Why the fuck would it matter what zoomers think?

No, I've watched it many times over the years, it's one of my favorite movies. The feeling of being lost in the woods is terrifying, especially if you are a college student. That alone creates good tension, and then the spooky shit starts happening and you get the sense they are being watched or followed. It's terrifying. The hand held camera goes a long way to making you feel like you are there, which makes what would normally a low stakes movie feel like you are in it and it amps the horror tenfold.

They planned on it thats what she was running from at the end she didn't film cause she was actually scared it was some olde guy in white long jons just standing in the woods just far enough to see a silhouette
Also they did in the 2016 movie and it looked like a mix between the thing from rec and the birch from crypt tv

Attached: download+(2).png (400x400, 146.34K)

askually its the McPhearson Tapes

Attached: flat,550x550,075,f.u1.jpg (550x472, 39.01K)

ACTUALLY, its "The Connection".
No one knows the McPhearson Tapes real date. It could be anywhere from 1979 to 1989.

Attached: 1jhnrn7cxfwz.jpg (2448x3264, 400.03K)