This show has 0 (ZERO) citations for it's so-called facts. How do people believe this shit?
This show has 0 (ZERO) citations for it's so-called facts. How do people believe this shit?
Other urls found in this thread:
It's true. Something similar happened, according to our researcher Robert Tralins, in 1998 on a newslist in Kentucky.
He was right about you being a fag though, OP
It never happened
wooden doors?
HAHA LE HOLOCAUST NEVER HAPPENED AM I RIGHT?
You are
>did the tale of the genocide of six million jews really happen? or are we just blowing smoke?
>A man stuck in a virtual hell. picking up shit from the floor, for free.
>It sounds ridiculous... but it's true
I played a videogame and Jonathan Frakes did a voice for it, crazy stuff
Rollercoasters into an oven? We made it up.
>And what about the story of the man, who insisted he was a woman? The surgical genital wound he deliberately prevented from healing? A true tale of mental instability, or have our writers transitioned into fiction?
>Our research indicates a similar event took place on the janitorial staff of a Mongolian image board. This one's real.
...
>An actress this erotic with a vagina that doesn't work. A lie? Sadly no.
You made it up, Yas Forums that's right.
>.t /lbgt/
Seething!
An actual Jewish person claimed that though you absolute bigot
Shut up, jew.
Is that acknowledged by any historian, does it appear in any professional historical work? Does anyone know it exists? Because I know that made up ahistorical offensive bullshit like The Painted Bird was not made for the historical community it's only used to serve contemporary politics so figures you would try to pretend it's something else.
rent free. 2 scoops. maga
streamable.com
>>>/Africa/
its fucking will riker he wouldn't lie to you
No, it was just claimed by a "holocaust survivor" in some of his memoirs. A lot of those memoirs are fake and are recognized as such.
Like the holocaust
he lied about Pegasus, and he pretended he didn't eat Ensign Ro's ass in that amnesia episode's ending
this but unironically
So no then? Why would anyone care about fake memoirs should we care about fake war stories too?
No, even people who are ardent defenders of muh 6 million will recognize that a lot of accounts are either exaggerated or flat out lies
based
>Why would anyone care about fake memoirs should we care about fake war stories too?
I mean, when they have to do with genocide yeah historians care about the fake stories too.
the majority of sources for the holocaust are "survivors". Why are they considered trustworthy, and moreover illegal to question in some countries, when we acknowledge that plenty of jews have just outright made stories up?