Is the criticism towards this character justified?

Is the criticism towards this character justified?

Attached: rey.jpg (540x650, 66.11K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/FxKtZmQgxrI?t=406
twitter.com/AnonBabble

I think he was just put in to sell toys.

She wasnt that bad
The sòy wasnt so strong in her

>this character
What character? Her entire personality is angry feminism face and sometimes acting like she's a fanfic self-insert.

Hollywood makes a ton of stupid movies with stupid characters. The criticism is justified to a degree, but the majority of the hate comes because lonely men felt slighted that they put a girl in that roll. I got news for you lads, all star wars is shit. luke skywalker was a shit character and the only reason anyone with any brains watched the originals when they came out was because the effects were so cool compared to anything else we had, not because the story was good. now everyone can do that shit so all you are left with is a gay little starshit flick with some dumb broad at the helm, "why is anyone even mentioning it?" is the real question.

She’s a literal Mary Sue

She didn't show her tits or ass, thus leaving me to stroke my cock to her red carpet pics.

such a dumb face.

There’s not enough criticism but of course all men are simps and all women are narcissists so everybody just gives this shit character and actress a pass because of her vagina.

Yeah, same as it was for anakin but in different ways. I feel bad for both actors though

>I BOIPASSD THA COMPRESSA'

I liked her acting, shes got some charisma on screen, but they wrote her as a mary sue, and its hard for dialogue to make sense when the plot ends up parody tier. hope she finds other work though

Mary Suewalker

she's barely a character to begin with

Do the red letter media prequel character test with her, or most of anyone in the new movies.
youtu.be/FxKtZmQgxrI?t=406
Literally no character

ahahahah what a hero

Attached: 1574596673964.jpg (400x258, 24.66K)

Hella charismatic in TFA

jej

But there was no character

she just got the benefit of the doubt at the time, because it was too early to bash her entire character yet

Nerd guys have been watching stuff like Buffy and Xena for decades. This movie and its characters failed because it's shit.

I could think of a couple things for the two gay guys at least. I feel like all the characters had some room for being decent coming out of the first film.

Well, sure some of the people have character, the same can be said for the prequels, the problem is that the sequel characters by and large have none to speak of.

She was suppose to be the young, nubile princess that was suppose to make the audience fall in love with her. However, the negro she partnered with for the majority of the trilogy created a dichotomy which was hard to swallow for most brainlet consumers of mass market cinema.

Yeah, the only change here now is Buffy, Alice (Resident Evil/Mila), Xena, and so forth is that nerd-boys now have this weird thing where they are sad about being lonely, but decide to hate women because of that. So it's hard to have a Buffy now even if you build a good story.

The character was written with only 1% of the absolute minimum detail required, for an actor to give a Razzie worthy performance. There was no way to get something good out of her. Lawrence Olivier in drag wouldn't be able to get something worthwhile out of it. If there is anything remotely likable about Rey, it is entirely due to Daisy's visage and nothing else. I am really amazed how this characters wasn't left on the cutting room floor.

she falls in love with a nigger? I've never seen the sequels

take your meds, retard

The character, yeah. The actress? No. Just like with GOT, retards can't separate fiction from reality.

no u

>luke skywalker was a shit character and the only reason anyone with any brains watched the originals when they came out was because the effects were so cool compared to anything else we had, not because the story was good.
alright taking the bait: there's tons of movies with amazing visuals these days, start with mouse wars. almost none of them will be remembered fondly as classics because the script and characters are not compelling.
so your wrong, now fuck off

>Is the criticism towards this character justified?
Yea, verily.

Unsubstantiated. Do you think America Chavez and Kamala Khan failed because they were female? Because their first appearances where successful. TFA was successful. The thing is that none of these were written well, so nobody returned.

It's not bait. that's not what I said. I said because now everything can have cool visuals, they need to back up the visuals with a good story - which they aren't doing. so nobody cares anymore. when the originals came out, it was so cool to see that the story didn't need to be all that great

Attached: LookMom.jpg (533x700, 83.85K)

which doesnt explain why the original characters are iconic until this day

What character? She's a self-insert.

Attached: 1527725353603.jpg (1215x992, 252.25K)

because people fell in love with them under the uniqueness of the spectacle of it all.

Too bad she had to wear the same clothes for three movies to get the merchandise from the first movie off the shelves.

Shes extremely bland and they didnt take any risks whatsoever with her

And I'm not one to usually do this but when I was watching the movies she was in I kept losing focus on the movie and thinking how strange looking she is. I couldn't focus on the movies at certain parts because she just looked so strange and out of place

whenever i heard the word simp i think of pussies that are all outer lips like homer simpsons mouth: simps