ITT: What is the worst film you have ever seen?

This is the only film that I almost couldn't watch to the end. The only reason why I finished it was to see if it was really as bad as people said. This abomination, along with Friedberg and Seltzer's other movies, effectively killed the spoof/parody genre. As a result there hasn't been a good spoof movie in decades.

SkeletonMan is one of the worst.

Filtered.

Attached: Skeletonman.jpg (472x640, 110.23K)

Mulholland Drive is pretty bad. It's no different to girl on girl porn from the same era.

Yes, I was filtered by a bad Japanese gore flick.

It was just too big-brained for me.

nualiens
star wars
kill list

All of these are so bad that they’re good.

>Troll 2

youtu.be/CkNB0w1fYKk

>Samurai Cop

youtu.be/R6OoZNdAQuA

>Miami Connection

youtu.be/VpZu69OB2KM

This was the longest hour of my life

The Predator (2018)

I honestly can’t decide. Each episode of the dullest franchise in the history movie franchises following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though

"No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: 5963CB2F-5596-4CEC-8233-0713212914C8.jpg (1601x2886, 3.13M)

dumb phone poster

Hard to decide when each episode of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains is indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though

"No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: E4DBB3A7-7541-43F5-A343-59CD7DC27B19.jpg (400x302, 33.18K)

woops sorry this was the trailer, they are all the same shit
youtube.com/watch?v=-U-JDQdHhpg

I love this pasta but it has fuck all to do with the thread

boyz in da hood

Zohan

Master of Disguise
It was a boring day and there wasn't anything else on tv. Movie felt like 5 hours long

Independence Day (1996)

Bump

Aliens vs Cowboys is the only film I remember walking out of the theatre for

Panic Room
Signs
The Neon Demon

This is the end. I seen it in theaters with friends, high, and me and my one buddy only laughed once. This was before i was as completely jaded as i am now. Failed completely as a comedy in every way

Neon demon is great, i hope you get cancer