name one film that has grossed over $500,000,000 and could accurately be described as "art"
protip: you can't
Name one film that has grossed over $500,000,000 and could accurately be described as "art"
Luke Gutierrez
Samuel Perry
Jack Cook
Jurassic Park (1993)
Landon Turner
endgame: Avenger
/thread
William Sanders
both wrong
Angel Mitchell
Captain America winter soldier
Charles Rogers
not only is it not art, but it's arguably not even film
William Hernandez
American Sniper directed by the auteur Clint Eastwood
Ryder Watson
tbch as much as the story sucks, most of the modern disney movies are visually stunning in every way
frozen 2 was a huge nothingburger but each frame was utterly gorgeous
Carson Perry
visual beauty isn't enough for a film to be considered art. we're not talking about a painting here, there's other components that have to be factored in
Carson Garcia
yeah i know i just wanted to say it
Jayden Rivera
Adjusted for inflation, Snow White
Aiden Mitchell
Gone with the Wind
Coco
The Sixth Sense
The Passion of the Christ
Dunkirk
Doctor Zhivago
The Lion King
Forrest Gump
West Side Story
Lawrence of Arabia
It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World
One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest
David Wright
>visual beauty isn't enough for a film to be considered art
Refn is proof that style = substance
Joseph Butler
Easy.
Brandon Wood
>adjusted for inflation
unadjusted list only, modern cinema goers are very different than they were in the past
unadjusted only. the handful of films on your list left aren't art
Mason Flores
why are you obsessed with art
grow up
Isaac Long
>unadjusted only.
Lincoln Campbell
pretending that film audiences in the 1960's and 1970's are the same as modern film audiences is absurd.
not to mention that directors had significantly more creative freedom in those days. the times have changed
Christian Mitchell
Lord of the Rings: Return of the King $1.142 Billion
Jose Cooper
>described as "art"
Anything can be described as "art", so even these children posting their capeshit aren't wrong.
Eli Barnes
The Exorcist
Chase Cooper
one of the few genuine contenders. but i'd say it misses the mark because of its over emphasis on special effects and action sequences.
good effort though, this one almost made it
Landon Bailey
The Wizard of Oz
Blake Rogers
You can't refuse to adjust for inflation. You're a brainlet.
Dylan Kelly
based
Easton Perez
the point of my thread is that, for various reasons, it's impossible to simultaneously make a blockbuster and a work of art in the 21st century.
the 60's and 70's don't interest me. not only were audiences smarter and more aesthetically sophisticated then, but high budget directors were also basically given free reign to do whatever they wanted. it was a different time
Ian Hughes
>it's impossible to simultaneously make a blockbuster and a work of art in the 21st century.
Jackson Fisher
Tinker Tailor
Bentley Walker
You are a faggot, OP. As usual.
Evan Mitchell
Describe this "art" to me OP
Daniel Richardson
Passion of the Christ
Aiden Scott
Go back to R*edit, OP. Your incredible faggotry is welcome there.