So we're meant to sympathetize with a pedo?

did you even watch the movie, user?

Yes because he’s hot

Did you?

How else was she was able to say with accuracy how his penis looked and there was other details she told to the woman who came to investigate.
It's been a few weeks since I watched it last so my recall might be a bit off

yes, and I really liked how dark it was - especially with him getting away with it all in the end

Her older brother and his friend showed her a penis on their phone. She got pissed that he didn't reciprocate her "love" and decided to fuck with him.

Did you even watch the movie?

>Living the rest of his life haunted by a crime he didn't commit is "getting away with it"
Post tits.

Nobody here watches movies they post about they just read wikipedia and articles talking about it.

Hence OP's post, I guess.
It makes sense.

Yes.

>he didn’t commit
somebody didn’t see the deleted scenes

lol so truu

>She didn't see the post credit deleted scene where it's suggested that the deleted scenes are a dream and never happened.

No that's not how it went down
The bitch care worker coaxed her into saying it.
It's a movie about fuck females

No smoke without fire

Attached: kp_karl_pilkington.jpg (680x400, 59.71K)

All the children described his big scary basement
He didn't have a basement
The movie is entirely about how even just an accusation can destroy the most solid social relations

When he sliced up that bitch and put her in glass slices, that was kino.

user, there's no worth in spending your time educating these retards. They either troll or have a room temperature IQ.

Are you gay?

I always thought it was about how feminism demonizes men and gives women an unnaturally powerful sway on public opinion since women are prone to not be as logical and much more vindictive then men

t. actual fucking retard

Checked.
But probably not, gays are over-represented in pedophilia and grooming cases, so OP is obviously a woman. You can also tell because she didn't understand the movie.

>people still fall for this bait

reading this made me laugh a lot.
Thank you even though I know it's bait

She didn't describe it in detail, she just said it was straight like a rod. She was just repeating what her older brother and his friend said when they showed her the pornography.
He was obviously innocent and if you think otherwise you're retarded.

>fuck females
yeah he did fuck an underage female, among others

beautiful people can do whatever the fuck they want without any consequences for the most part

absolute brainlet
the fact there's fake stories surrounding an event doesn't make the even itself fake, the kids would have made up stories about his basement regardless of whether he fucked the girl or not

>straight like a rod
Holy shit, I think the perpetrator might be me.

You tell them chauvinist pigs! Soul Sister!
#metoo
#believeWhamyn

gz on your strawman dude, stay ignorant

>She only describes a penis on her own because her brother showed her some porn
>The psychologist coaxed her into describing porn
>Most likely the caretakers lately coaxed the kids into reporting abuse and basements
>No basement
>No proofs
>The girl confesses and apolgises to her father when she confuses him with Mads
>Movie is explicitly about how mass hysteria appears when emotions take the pleace of reason
>You retards can still only think about mih pedo got away
Some movies are just not for brainlets

Bro if the key setting of an event with otherwise wildly different details is completely false, then the one thing binding all of the stories together is broken
The story itself falls apart
It'd be like if me and three other dudes talked about some dude raping a immigrant but each of us described the color of the immigrant, the height and gender differently but we all had the same story of the apartment and address and then when the cops check the apartment they can find no such building at all

>strawman
Strawwoman, you bigot.

>mads
>our guy
>ugly in any way

Attached: Mads_Mikkelsen.jpg (1080x1351, 180.89K)

>It'd be like if me and three other dudes talked about some dude raping a immigrant but each of us described the color of the immigrant, the height and gender differently but we all had the same story of the apartment and address and then when the cops check the apartment they can find no such building at all
bad analogy
proper one is
>dude accused of raping woman
>you come forward saying you also saw that same dude raping someone else someplace else
>it's proved fake
>therefore the original rape accusation is false
non sequitur fren

it would be the second only if the details of the original accusation were true
which they weren't in the film

The girl confessed about the lie you retard.

>he didn't see the x-rated cut with the 35 minute long scene of him actually doing it
It had close ups and everything, ya'll missin out.

>What's a USB cable, Mads?
I'll never forget that scene.

>fuck females
You wish

>no basement
when they talk the basement thing the guy winks at Mads - you just now he helped him cover it all up

I don't know if it's a meme to pretend he's not a pedo, but it's clear as day that he is, the film not only makes quite obvious allusions to it throughout the film, but hammers it into the viewers head at the end with the very symbolic scene.
Mads it in the forest, hunting with his friends when suddenly he departs from them and goes on his own, symbolic of him hunting a wildly different thing (children in this case), now comes the most important sequence in the film, a shadowy figure ontop of the hill looks down on Lucas and aims a gun at him, shooting a warning shot. Let's break this down, Lucas (biblical name for Bringer of Light, the shadowy figure is illuminated by the morning sun, hence the bringer of light) with this it's clear as day that the shadowy figure is Lucas himself, and the higher positioning obviously alluding to him being the super ego of Lucas, whereas the Lucas we've been following is the id, the carnal one, slave to the pleasures of flesh.
What this proves is, Lucas is in constant battle with himself, fighting to keep that monster in chains. His morality is judging him at all times, his wants and actions. The townspeople and how they behave towards Lucas is his own projection as to how they should treat him, rather than how they're actually treating him. His own psyche subconsciously picking up these ubiquitous but concealed derisive feelings towards him and amping them up to be more than they actually are.

The film is a brilliant case study of the inner workings of a pedofile stifling his own desires and coming to terms with his actions.

sure thing Ruby Bates

The ending is definitely left to be ambiguous. Lucas will never escape from what he did. And the townsfolk will always know what he's capable of.

But this shot near the very ending explicitly shows a basement. This is when the film makes you question whether Lucas had done it after all and that there actually was a basement

Attached: Screenshot_20200411-162453.jpg (3120x1440, 831.73K)

Attached: behave like an adult.jpg (1920x1080, 248.91K)

so that’s his fetish?

Lmao, you got me there.

Attached: nice.jpg (1920x1080, 181.98K)

>Biblical interpretation
This is the point in a movie analysis that you should stop and realise you're writing pure shit.

Vinterberg uses biblical names as a way to help paint his characters better. If you've seen any of his other films, this applies, e.g. Command / Madding Crow / The Celebration.

>When I wanted to do the rape scene, I explained to [Annika Wedderkopp] that I was going to hit her and rape her. There was no emotional relationship between us, because I had put a clause in all the children’s contracts stating that they would not get treats from the director. We had never talked to each other. I knew nothing about her. We went to the basement with two other people: the photographer and a technician. No one else. I said, ‘I’m not going to rehearse. There will be only one take because it will be impossible to repeat. Roll the cameras only when I signal you to.’ Then I told her, ‘Pain does not hurt. Hit me.’ And she hit me. I said, ‘Harder.’ And she started to hit me very hard, hard enough to break a rib... I ached for a week. After she had hit me long enough and hard enough to tire her, I said, ‘Now it’s my turn. Roll the cameras.’ And I really... I really... I really raped her. And she screamed.”

damn, Vinterberg really went all-out with this, and still decided to cut the scene

K