Any kino about everyday American heroes?

FPBP

I doubt it.

They genuinely made the world a better place.

Their bond was raised to $250,000 and they're currently awaiting trial. Since they raised the bond tenfold, it means the courts are essentially indicating they were in the wrong.

They haven't finished the trial or sentenced yet, but the son and father are completely fucked. They don't have a strong self-defense case as they kept escalating the situation rather than defuse it.

Does anyone remember the folk-guitar song made out of this? I think it was only posted in Vocaroo, but its main hook was "I doubt it." It wasn't just lyrics like these , someone actually sang it.

liveleak.com/view?t=uX70K_1537453032
>for those who haven't seen

Based the both of you, also Sneed.

Attached: 1537552239739.png (868x1059, 715.33K)

>escalating

What kind of blue state bullshit is that? They had every right to be there. They stood their ground.

Why is texas so based? I'm so glad I live here.

Attached: Awesome-Bluebonnet-Wallpaper.jpg (2560x1600, 2.51M)

>They don't have a strong self-defense case
>Man weilding bat charges them after saying hell kill them

You're an idiot. Luckily, even the courts in TX will find them both guilty. Stand your ground is for defending yourself, not antagonizing other people and trying to get them to make the barest of hostile actions so you can shoot them to death over a mattress. Courts operate on real world logic, not redneck incel Yas Forums logic.

link to news article?

Seriously if Aaron hit one of them in the head with the bat it could have killed them. He had a deadly weapon with intent to use. They were in the right to shoot his ass.

Attached: 1586412949188.jpg (288x500, 21.65K)

>They don't have a strong self-defense case

Attached: 1585851601418.jpg (655x625, 51.4K)

>

Attached: 1582500882106.jpg (548x397, 34.38K)

>t. cocksucker

Attached: tenor.gif (343x498, 3.59M)

He tried to swing a bat at them. I dont think youve ever had a bat swung at you but your baiting bitch ass would fire if in their situation. If you can even operate a firearm.

I doubt it

>being these guys
Silly silly men.

It's like a fucking canned emote in a video game. So perfect.

Yeah, believe it or not there's a gigantic list of things you can and cannot do when you're acting in self defense. It is not a license to murder anyone who is hostile towards you in any fashion. There are thresholds. and neither of those rednecks meet any of them. They wanted the conflict, they weren't even slightly fearful, they were encouraging and hoping he would make a hostile action so they could shoot him to death, and how they killed him wasn't justifiable based on what was taking place.

But whatever, last post I'm making on this because retarded incels want to play pretend internet lawyer like these guys have any shot of beating the charges against them. Time will prove me correct while you guys whine about the outcome.

the faggot who died should've mind his own business. provoking a red neck is never a good idea. with that said, I think the red neck should go to jail as well endof

Attached: tenor.gif (220x242, 219.08K)

do you wanna know how i know you're a fat autistic slob incapable of reading human emotions?

>Man comes charging at you with a bat with intent to harm/kill
>Defend yourself
>Get jailed
OH SAY CAN YOU SEE

>there's a gigantic list of things you can and cannot do when you're acting in self defense
For no good reason. START SHIT GET HIT BITCH

>He tried to swing a bat at them
After their provoking him.

Both parties were in the wrong. The guy trying dispose his mattress in his neighbors' dumpster was in the wrong. The neighbors were in the wrong in trying to escalate the situation and the guy was still in the wrong for not walking away when firearms were brought into the situation by the neighbors.

Needlessly antagonistic. Sorry if you're having a bad day, man.

Seethe and dilate

You are playing internet lawyer and you're terrible at it. Any competent lawyer would have the case won in a heartbeat
>they brought weapons because they were afraid he would be violent
>their bravado was an attempt to scare him off
>they didn't point their weapons at him until it was necessary
>they didn't shoot until he very clearly threatened them and made a move to attack them
Case won. If they bring in the boatload of bad character evidence for this asshole even better.

Attached: JAGOFF.gif (382x554, 2.57M)

>Time will prove me correct while you guys whine about the outcome.

Attached: EB308BA6-2B6D-497C-8E2F-7CA2635E0950.jpg (1242x1878, 331.82K)

Brian Wilson NOOO!

>Thresholds
If raising a deadly weapon and preparing to attack after threatening to kill a person doesn't reach that threshold then why even have self-defence laws in the first place?

>fat manlet pussies with guns show no restraint
>guy a head taller lets off steam and tests their balls, only to find out they have no balls but they’ll act like it with live ammunition
Yeah reel cool bro.

>provoking

You sound like lying CNN defaming hero Zimmerman. If a gun owner doesn't run away from a criminal thug, then that is what you call "provoking".

But thats literally the opposite of what happened

I don't understand the idiots going to bat for these guys, no pun intended. This was originally marketed as a pro gun thing and murrica but these guys were clearly pathetic cowards in the wrong and now retards are doubling down on the dindu bullshit. What happened to your white pride or whatever? This is just pathetic.

If the meth head behaved like that around cops he would have ended up with a lot more bullet holes. He was a piece of shit and the boomers did the state of Texas a favor.

Attached: dumpster.jpg (1024x1024, 228.22K)

The only reason they raised the bond was that an edited version of the video was leaked by the wife and all the (((journalists))) drove up a media storm

Take yer shwing

You implying either of those obese fags would have picked a fight without a two on one gunfight against a guy with a bat?

Yikes

Attached: 178EA0C4-D290-4098-9202-317BD2071A25.jpg (185x272, 8.14K)

>lmao you're a fucking coward if you bring a gun to defend yourself against a 6'7 psycho with a decades-long rapsheet who has a baseball bat and is threatening to kill you

Attached: brainlet.webm (640x360, 2.46M)

>cowards

Why do so many people not know what that word means? Especially the Tide Pod generation. Cowards run away. They do not stand their ground. Brave men stand their ground. user, you have been completely brainwashed and demoralized.

Attached: F864FD68-BC88-4CA7-9D20-F9689EC67CCA.jpg (325x1024, 47.76K)

Literally the first thing they teach you in combat is if you fight someone with vastly uneven odds in your favor you are a coward. Nice try zoomer.

People are autistic with how they handle guns. Some people legitimately dont think theyll get shot. Its not like in the movies where they freeze up and beg. Most boomers and weekend warriors will take that as a threat to their masculinity and escalate the situation.
This same situation happened outside my house last weekend when a tweeker on a bike flipped off and kicked a car that was turning and the guy got out of his car. When the tweeker went up planning to swing or some dumb shit the guy pulled his gun and told him he was carrying. The tweeker went fucking berserk at this telling him to put it down so he can beat his ass like "a man" that just made the guy not want to put the gun down even more. Likely the tweeker guy pussed out but I thought I was about to get footage for the next big thing.

Yeah I'm sure they had his rapsheet on hand you revisionist faggot.

eurojunkies are just seething that people want to blast their heads off in this thread. guns and technology are here to stay for now and people who know how to use them will have power over those who don't.

This wasnt a one time thing theyd had issues with this guy and had to know of his past.

They lived next to him, I'm sure they understood he was an unhinged shithead. /r/ing the Facebook rant where he threatened to kill the mailman for doing his job.

Attached: orange_rapsheet.png (1853x978, 312.67K)

you've been watching too many movies kid.

As did the other neighbors with them.

Dude was a meth head with a rap sheet a mile long

Fuck off. You are an absolute retard. Instructors tell you not to pick on the weak at a bare minimum for liability reasons. Your edgy head canon is not reality.

>Instructors are my authority
use your head for once and maybe you will not get shot druggie

Who taught you "combat"? Your single mother? Look how immoral your "morality" is. According to you, strong people are always "cowards" and the weak are always brave. No wonder you are so fucked up in the head. Did they teach you that garbage in public school? You are pure evil.

>heh yeah I'm wrong but I'm right
alright child

I will never understand Yas Forums and Yas Forums's defense of these gross inbred fat blob rednecks.

(You)

They weren't picking on a crippled old lady or a child. They were standing up to a violent, unstable criminal who was way bigger and stronger than either of them you dumbfuck. Not their problem Texas Orange brought a bat to a gun fight.

Attached: miller_virus.jpg (640x854, 95.24K)

> According to you, strong people are always "cowards" and the weak are always brave

you really need to learn to read. I never said anything of the sort.

This kind of thinking he has is byproduct of cultural marxism and being raised by single mothers

why are americans dumb fat ugyl lol

You did you fucing inbred. It's your entire point.

They literally just make shit up so they have a hero to relate to with similar physiognomy and "bravery" as them.

the druggie is dead and gone for good, the shooters strong and alive. you can perverse this with muh morality but in the end it will always come down to who is ready to pull the trigger to kill.

>Instructors

Name names, retard. I want to talk to your so called instructor. I want to hear her explain how the strong must always surrender to the weak.

>Idiot with a bat is being violent and threatening you
>He tries to attack you
>Shoot him in self defense
Not really that hard to follow user.

Attached: 1581716318508.jpg (820x717, 232.92K)

No it's literally not. You wouldn't even be able to prove you inferred that you double digit IQ retard.

I don't understand how this is so hard to grasp.

They probably are exactly like these guys and have fantasies about shooting other people in the same spineless manner of provoking a raging idiot and then claiming self defense.

So you mean FDR was a coward for joining the war against the Axis because it made the war lopsided for the allies? You are the biggest brainlet on this site dude

Imagine unironically defending pic related.

Attached: you_suck.jpg (384x480, 75.43K)

>you in combat is if you fight someone with vastly uneven odds in your favor you are a coward.
> you in combat is if you fight someone with vastly uneven odds in your favor you are a coward.
>fight someone with vastly uneven odds in your favor you are a coward.
>I never said anything of the sort.

says the guy who samefagged several posts before he could figure out a boneheaded false analogy

Not what happened. They're going to jail for murder, and when they do I'm going harvest redneck tears for WEEKS with my shitposting.

You might have a point if they whipped out concealed weapons and just started firing without warning but they were clearly displayed. Yells-at-his-wife-in-public man was repeatedly told to de-escalate, but chose to assault the Millers anyway.

what was the whole sentence user... try again...

That is exactly what you said. "Literally the first thing they teach you in combat is if you fight someone with vastly uneven odds in your favor you are a coward" That is what you call morality. That is what I call evil.

such a brutal assault it was. they were lucky to get away with their lives.

Context?

Attached: Confused_dog.jpg (326x304, 15.28K)

>the first thing they teach you in combat is if you fight someone with vastly uneven odds in your favor you are a coward
Thus as long as you're in a fight with someone weaker than you, despite the reason for the conflict, you are a coward.

>Not what happened.
You do realize it's all on video right?

Attached: 1583493818960.png (640x640, 80.65K)

I never once said strong people are always cowards. I said something entirely fucking different in relation to individual combat. He could have fucking disabled him and shot him in the leg. Or is your aim not good enough you fucking pussy? Maybe buy a .22

Does that change anything you disingenuous asshat? You implied it clear as day and now you deflect. Rest of your post doesnt change anything.
>hurr they told meee
I doubt it.

Which is exactly what would have happened if they chose to be unarmed while confronting a violent psycho with a bat like some retarded anons whining about muh cowardice think they should have done.

>everyone acting like a bat is a deadly weapon when you have multiple weapons on your side
kek

Counter the argument retard

It's almost as if, you can get out of conflict. Holy shit I know I'm a genius.

>just disable and shoot him in the leg
Confirmed for not knowing a fucking thing about self defense with guns and talking out of his ass. This is a terrible idea for a lot of reasons and anyone who knows anything about using guns could explain why.

If they were strong they wouldn’t bring a shotgun to a mattress fight. If they were strong we would have a cool video of two people beating the shit out of a guy, not some shakey shit where two fat pussies shoot a guy because they can’t settle arguments in any way but 60iq niggrish behavior.

I hope this is bait.

>shot him in the leg

I've heard enough. I'm done with you.

Attached: starship troopers-disgusted michael ironside.png (1118x1004, 518.37K)

>I can't explain it but I'm sure someone else can
el oh el

They were using fucking buckshot you absolute retard

Yes. The problem is your interpretation is shit. But please keep the denial coming. Keeping some screencaps for the eventual guilty verdict.

Here, explain this for me so I can add more redneck denial to my screencap: how do you think they're going to explain firing another set of rounds into Aaron after he was already severely wounded and lying on the ground and could only limply throw his bat at them? Good luck making an argument that those kill shots were necessary after the first round of fire.

So is the bat only a deadly weapon if you would refuse to shoot?
Does that mean if you refuse to shoot you can legally shoot the person wielding the bat?